[estherglycol]

Djokovic is 5-5 if you don't count walkovers and retirements with all 5 losses coming from Sinner and Alcaraz.

 

[BaselineGod]

Federer: 11-13 (2018-19)
Djokovic: 5-8 (2024-)
Nadal: 0-3 (2023-24)

Whats the point? Federer was the worst of them all between 28,5-35,5.... All his career is sustented for what he did between AO2004 and USO 2007, where he won 11/20 slams.. yes, that is 3 years and 7 months. His career extended around 24 years but he did the vast majority in less than a sixth of it... Even counting the time he was competitive (when he could win atp titles) from Milan 2001 to Basel 2019.

 

[The Hero Cop Mark]

Federer celebrates his birthday 2.5 months later than Djokovic (22nd of May and 8th of August, the difference is 78 days)
So, for Federer, the count should begin 78 days from the start of the year, which would be the 19th of March, 2018.
Or, we should count it from the 15th of October, 2023 for Djokovic

But nice try.

 

[Moozza]

Djokovic is in his 39th year

 

[Bella&Mirka]

Djokovic is 5-5 if you don't count walkovers and retirements.

https://www.menstennisforums.com/at...g.435265/?auto=webp&fit=bounds&format=pjgp&height=1920&optimize=high&width=1920

 

[florentine]

 

[sheep85]

fedtards are still at it

 

[sr8685]

Olderer top level a touch higher perhaps. Can't see 38 year old Djokovic beating 2019 Djokovic or getting within multiple match points in a slam final. Can see Olderer getting wins vs Alcaraz as well.

Advantage Oldovic in general longevity. He would still beat the players he is supposed to be beating (the mugs of the tour) but will likely struggle more vs top players.

 

[laughingcavalier]

 

[BaselineGod]

Djokovic is in his 39th year

Not how we humans count age.. he is still 38 and 4 months.

 

[Moozza]

Not how we humans count age.. he is still 38 and 4 months.

Yes it is. He is 38 years old but in his 39th year.

A baby was born yesterday. Is that baby in its 1st year or 0th year?

 

[aselto]

Djokovic is 5-5 if you don't count walkovers and retirements with all 5 losses coming from Sinner and Alcaraz.

Just because Djokovic gave up midway through the match, doesn't mean it's not a loss.

 

[TooMuchRaquet]

Djokovic is 5-5 if you don't count walkovers and retirements with all 5 losses coming from Sinner and Alcaraz.

I'd go further. He's 5-0 if you don't count losses.

 

[Martin12]

Whats the point? Federer was the worst of them all between 28,5-35,5.... All his career is sustented for what he did between AO2004 and USO 2007, where he won 11/20 slams.. yes, that is 3 years and 7 months. His career extended around 24 years but he did the vast majority in less than a sixth of it... Even counting the time he was competitive (when he could win atp titles) from Milan 2001 to Basel 2019.

LOL. Federer at that age had to play against Djokovic and Nadal in their best years. Djokovic and Nadal at that age had Olderer as their strongest opponent and otherwise could feast on Lost Gen. If you switch Federer‘s and Djokovic‘s birth year, Federer would have won multiple CYGS.

 

[The Hero Cop Mark]

LOL. Federer at that age had to play against Djokovic and Nadal in their best years. Djokovic and Nadal at that age had Olderer as their strongest opponent and otherwise could feast on Lost Gen. If you switch Federer‘s and Djokovic‘s birth year, Federer would have won multiple CYGS.

If he can only avoid Berdych, Soderling, Tsonga, Robredo, Gulbis, Cilic, Seppi, Wawrinka, Raonic
Thanks for reminding us why you fedtards are the most delusional group ever.

Had you switched Djokovic and Federer's ages, Djokovic would have lost like 3 or 4 matches in total during the 2003-2007 era.

 

[MIJB#19]

Neat, something new to discuss: a thread about the big3 with some completely random meaningless statistics to stir another goat debate.