Well, not much for me to say here apart from: Congrats to all Alca fans out there! He almost did 40-15, but eventually won.
I doubt it. Djokovic does not have the forehand to move Sinner like Alcaraz did todayYep 2-4 A/DF and 48% 1st serves won’t cut it against Alcaraz. Djokovic legitimately could’ve beaten this version of sinner
Cyclops is chatting with his bestie never a questionYeah, "not EveN toP 20 oN hC!!" It's hilarious how some people prefer to stay in denial despite all evidence. Btw, where is dear @Cyclops![]()
Big titles:slam count at 22 years and 4 months
Alcaraz = 6
Nadal = 5
Federer = 1
Djokovic = 1
He was in live thread?Where did @Never A Question go?
Sampras and Federer and Djokovic didn't win the US Open without dropping a set, no reason Alcaraz would have this kind of privilege.He's clearly 2nd best HC player in the world right now.
I thought you would know.Where did @Never A Question go?
He didn't almost do a 40-15. Stop the sinner fan fiction.Well, not much for me to say here apart from: Congrats to all Alca fans out there! He almost did 40-15, but eventually won.
Around 2,5 million,thanks to New York income tax on top of federal tax.$5 million paycheck for Carlos, holy inflation Batman.
it comes to who plays better at the time...sinner was amazing at wimby, he served fantastic and alcaraz had nothing to sayAlcaraz base level is better than Sinners.
It's honestly ridiculous to say otherwise. People only do because they want to make them sound close. But the reality is they're just not close at all.