Mens Tennis Forums banner
41 - 60 of 64 Posts
Pointless? Lol $$$$$
Let's put money aside now. With a packed schedule like this, the actual ATP tour tournaments should be more important to him than exhibitions. At exhibitions, players primarily compete for the fat money check. He still has a chance to compete for the year-end world #1, although small, as the gap between him and Alca in the Race is quite big, but he still has it. He shouldn't overplay and tire himself out.
 
Discussion starter · #45 ·
Really, it's mostly six kings that's weird here, although I agree that he should remove Vienna as well. Shanghai, Paris and Turin are all mandatory and at his age he should play all. It would've looked better if Shanghai were a 56 draw instead of 96 draw. I was surprised to see Zverev is also playing Vienna as well.

I assume that realistically, decisions will probably be made after Shanghai depending on Alcaraz and Sinner's results until then. There are quite a few possibilities for Sinner to retake #1 by Turin, especially as Alcaraz is not playing Vienna/Basel and Sinner not protecting points from Paris. I have my doubts, though, that Sinner will keep #1 after Turin.
Paris/London points used to be dropping on same day,not anymore?
 
Discussion starter · #46 ·
Let's put money aside now. With a packed schedule like this, the actual ATP tour tournaments should be more important to him than exhibitions. At exhibitions, players primarily compete for the fat money check. He still has a chance to compete for the year-end world #1, although small, as the gap between him and Alca in the Race is quite big, but he still has it. He shouldn't overplay and tire himself out.
Its potential 6 milions for 3 bo3 matches!!!!in other cases even for two matches.
 
Its potential 6 milions for 3 bo3 matches!!!!in other cases even for two matches.
Eurojackpot is 120 million, still a long way to go for Saudis. But yes, such an amount of money is very tempting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: del piero
And unlike Carlos Us open check(half of that went to federal and local tax),basically 2,5 million ,i am not sure how high saudi tax.
I just read there are 0 taxes. I don't know if it's true, but if it is, then no taxing of their prize money.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Johnny Groove
I just read there are 0 taxes. I don't know if it's true, but if it is, then no taxing of their prize money.
Event keeps getting better and better
 
It's really not that extreme. Last two seasons he played 79 and 84 matches.

So far he's on 43. If he were to make the final of Beijing, Shanghai, 6 Kings, Vienna, Paris and WTF, he would have played an extra 28 matches, so 71 in total.
Davis Cup is another 3 singles max, plus max 3 doubles.

It's a lot of matches in two months, but doable at his age, no 5 setters either and you'd expect him to win many/most comfortably - his next 3 will be something like Atmane/Muller/ADM, for example.
For context, Alcaraz played 23 matches in two months on clay this spring (but 7 of them were best of 5) and won all but 1.
 
Not like here where it goes up to around 40%, shitty ways of capitalism.
I think 6 Kings Slam may last longer than Laver Cup financially, I hear they are in the red

Saudi oil money def. Federer Rolex money

Laver Cup is fun, but imagine paying California or UK taxes :help:
 
Discussion starter · #56 ·
I think 6 Kings Slam may last longer than Laver Cup financially, I hear they are in the red

Saudi oil money def. Federer Rolex money

Laver Cup is fun, but imagine paying California or UK taxes :help:
IW and Miami having same prize money,but winners bank account looks different,thanks to Taxafornia madness.
 
IW and Miami having same prize money,but winners bank account looks different,thanks to Taxafornia madness.
Last year when Sinner won 6 Kings Slam, it was HALF his prize money for the SEASON!

And after taxes probably 60-70% honestly
 
41 - 60 of 64 Posts