Mens Tennis Forums banner

What happened to Prince Tennis racquets?

30K views 44 replies 22 participants last post by  chriscook870  
#1 ·
Prince racquets used to have a lot of users on tour, but now hardly anyone uses it.

Agassi, Chang, A. Medvedev, Enqvist, Rafter, A. Costa, Ferrero, Davydenko, Ferrer, Coria, Isner, Monfils, Sharapova, Capriati, Zvonareva and Sabatini.

What happened?
 
#2 ·
Prince racquets used to have a lot of users on tour, but now hardly anyone uses it.

Agassi, Chang, A. Medvedev, Enqvist, Rafter, A. Costa, Ferrero, Davydenko, Ferrer, Coria, Isner, Monfils, Sharapova, Capriati, Zvonareva and Sabatini.

What happened?
30 years happened
 
#15 · (Edited)
They do also rackets still. I believe Tennis Warehouse is the exclusive online distributor, at least for their rackets. I've seen e.g. some padel gear in other online stores.

Their recent models have tended to receive mostly positive reviews. I also have one fairly recent model, the Prince Textreme Tour 100 310 g, from 2019. But very few pros these days play with one. I believe Isner has been with Prince pretty much throughout his entire pro career. Swiatek used to also be with Prince not too long ago (used the same racket, Prince Textreme Tour 100, but the 290 g version; won his 1st GS with this), before switching to Tecnifibre in 2021.

Image


Imagine what a miss... Swiatek would've without a doubt launched them to a period of new glory. The #1 player after all.

Tecnifibre instead has been making headway with solid signings.
 
#17 · (Edited)
Do you know from which year these are? Quite a bit heavier than rackets these days (I believe mostly around 315 - 325 g strung in stock form). Interesting head sizes as well (90, 110 or 125).
 
#28 ·
#22 ·
Its popularity also declined a lot nowadays in the squash community.
Personally I just purchased some non-pressurized price tennis training ball a few months ago because it's cheaper than Wilson's, but the balls look quite dead to me as it's even less bouncier than the worn-out normal balls
 
#23 ·
Prince has always made excellent tennis racquets. I still have a Prince frame from the late 90s that I use from time to time. Very well-made. They used to be such a prominent brand.

I think they have made some attempts to come back into the market. They recently partnered with the clothing brand Hydrogen, making some funky looking new racquets with the Hydrogen logo.

Image


What they really need, though, is some high profile players on their payroll. It's inexplicable that they didn't try to snag Iga Swiatek after she won Roland Garros with an off-the-shelf Prince racquet.
 
#32 ·
Prince has always made excellent tennis racquets. I still have a Prince frame from the late 90s that I use from time to time. Very well-made. They used to be such a prominent brand.

I think they have made some attempts to come back into the market. They recently partnered with the clothing brand Hydrogen, making some funky looking new racquets with the Hydrogen logo.

Image
extremely hideous with that skull logo
 
#34 ·
#31 ·
My first serious racquet that I used to play for quite a while was Rafter's Prince Warrior TT, loved that one so much ❤


My next Prince racquet was Prince O3 Speedport Tour. I'm still playing with it, amazing racquet 😍


As a backup racquets I bought recently Prince Tour 100T

 
#35 · (Edited)

Another take by a long time tennis shop owner (I tend to watch this guy's videos in 2x speed; not the only one based on some of the comments I've seen :)). According to him Prince rackets were comparatively difficult to string. Plus, around the time new competitors like Babolat had begun to garner success, Prince came up with their EXO3 concept that according to this guy wasn't very well received/liked.


How they present it here, it does sound interesting. That there would be a point to it (e.g. the increased sweet spot). Would like to try one. I do vaguely recall reading (as I was researching the Prince Textreme Tour I went and bought) that EXO3 rackets would also be slightly more cumbersome to string. You'd think the fact that other companies have not implemented similar solutions also says sth.

--

Edit. Apparently the larger holes are called 'O ports'.

When Prince came out with the o3 racquets a few years ago, many people were very skeptical because to have such big holes in a racquet just does not look right. However, this technology made playing tennis that much more fun.

The O ports were one of the few technologies that actually worked. Many of the technologies that racquet companies come out with are generally not very revolutionary. The Prince o3 technology was not one of those.

The O ports actually increased the sweet spot on the racquet. Generally, you need to hit the ball right in the middle to make it feel great. However, with the O port technology, the sweetspot increased as much as 30%. This was huge and a lot of tennis players really liked the feel of these racquets. The other thing that was so great about the O ports was that the professional tennis players were using these racquets.

I have always said that I do not think that most of the top players change their racquets. They might change the paint job on the racquet but not the actual racquet. However, with O port racquets, you could actually tell a customer, yes this racquet is the same racquet that Maria Sharapova was using. This added great credibility to the Prince brand and the O port technology.
Image
 
#37 ·

Another take by a long time tennis shop owner (I tend to watch this guy's videos in 2x speed; not the only one based on some of the comments I've seen :)). According to him Prince rackets were comparatively difficult to string. Plus, around the time new competitors like Babolat had begun to garner success, Prince came up with their EXO3 concept that according to this guy wasn't very well received/liked.


How they present it here, it does sound interesting. That there would be a point to it (e.g. the increased sweet spot). Would like to try one. I do vaguely recall reading (as I was researching the Prince Textreme Tour I went and bought) that EXO3 rackets would also be slightly more cumbersome to string. You'd think the fact that other companies have not implemented similar solutions also says sth.

--

Edit. Apparently the larger holes are called 'O ports'.



View attachment 399725
I never had any complaints about difficult stringing from the guys who string my Prince O3 racquets. Yes it's a bit different than stringing ordinary racquets, but after stringing it once everyone learns how to easily string them.
 
#36 ·
Martin Jaite playing with a Prince Woodie in Roland Garros 1985. That was an extremely soft frame, being wood and oversized (but reinforced with carbon).

Image


Here's Jaite playing Wilander in Rome 1987. That's a match between the two most flexible racquet frames on the market at the time. And it shows in the playing style