Mens Tennis Forums banner
21 - 40 of 54 Posts
Discussion starter · #21 ·
  • Djokovic
Reactions: RocketMan70
Discussion starter · #22 ·
Yes it is a far more open era, no pun intended, than the last one

Even if Big 3 would lose, rare, Murray or some other top 10 like Wawrinka or Tsonga would win the event
Bad examples, those two. They used to regularly flop at Masters tournaments. Both made it only to nine semifinals in their entire careers. It's Berdych (19 semifinals) and Ferrer (18) who were the true gatekeepers at M1000 level.
 
Yes it is a far more open era, no pun intended, than the last one

Even if Big 3 would lose, rare, Murray or some other top 10 like Wawrinka or Tsonga would win the event

Nowadays, if Sinner or Alcaraz are out, literally anyone in top 200 can take the title

Will Vacherot win another Masters 1000? Prob not. This probably the peak of his career but you never know

Overall point is that anyone can beat anyone on any day, and you must always be ready
Doing Murray a disservice there. He won a boat load of masters regardless of the point at which the “big 3” lost.
 
Bad examples, those two. They used to regularly flop at Masters tournaments. Both made it only to nine semifinals in their entire careers. It's Berdych (19 semifinals) and Ferrer (18) who were the true gatekeepers at M1000 level.
Yes those two were just there all the time. Others were here and there

Shame Soderling had to retire so early
 
Not sure why Wawrinka keeps getting brought into conversations re: consistency on tour. He won a single MS event and reached 9 SFs over a 9 year period. He was no less a gatekeeper at 1000 level than Thiem was.

Berdych and Ferrer alongside the other 4 would be more apt.
 
Sport, in general, can be unpredictable.
There has always been upsets in tennis for as long as I can remember. Sometimes, players just "peak" out of nowhere for a few tournaments and never do so again.
Vacherot being ranked 204 was only really due to an injury and being inconsistent since he came back from it. He was just outside the Top 100 when he was injured. In saying that, I never saw him as a top player. Well done to him (and Rinderknech, another late developer) for being able to accomplish this feat. Other players, who could be regarded as better tennis players, have not and will never do this, for reasons of their own making.
 
  • Djokovic
  • Like
Reactions: R and RocketMan70
Vacherot's Shanghai victory demonstrated the uselessness of secondary players in the current field - they failed to win a master even with Alcaraz and Sinner being out.
 
It means we must be extra careful when we purchase tickets, esp. if you r thinking about buying ones for the semis and finals. You may end up seeing completely different players from the ones you expected to see.
By the way, tickets, esp. for tour-level tournaments, are becoming ridiculously expensive. Someone like me who is struggling to feed myself day in day out no way can afford them. I used to travel arond the world to watch tennis tournaments, when ticket prices were about a fifth of the current rate. I would get autographs from the likes of Jeff Tarango and Todd Woodford. Those glorious days are long gone. I just watch tennis sitting in front of my computer all day.
 
21 - 40 of 54 Posts