Well, not much for me to say here apart from: Congrats to all Alca fans out there! He almost did 40-15, but eventually won.
No, it's because on this court unless you nail your dropshots you pay the price. As was seen quite a few times for both players.Few dropshots from Alcaraz, he was that confident in his ground strokes.
I thought Djokovic worshippers did not care about this particular stat, citing it as meaningless?At least Alcaraz dropped a set during this run. It would've been a nightmare for hard court tennis had he won without losing a set. He's not that good on hard courts, even when playing his best.
Djokovic's first six were 4x AO, 1x Wim, 1x USONadal's six wins were four RG (05-06-07-08),
one Wimbledon (08)
one AO (09)
At 7 slams, the only one to be so balanced was... Wilander (Let's keep in mind that Borg had no option on HC before.. US Open 1978, and finally, 4 possible attempts until 1981 (with 3 finals anyway..)I thought Djokovic worshippers did not care about this particular stat, citing it as meaningless?
Djokovic's first six were 4x AO, 1x Wim, 1x USO
Federer's first six were 3x Wim, 2x USO, 1x AO
So on the surface Carlos has the most rounded resumé of the four - all three surfaces covered and equal distribution between them
Lol it was indoors and he hit 40+ winners to Sinners 24There's a chance AO courts will get slower in the future. There were days they were quite slow. Anyway, I still retain my doubt on Alcaraz's capability on quicker hard courts, USO this year is not quick enough.