2025 will mark the first year that none of the Big 3 have won a "Big Title" in more than 20 years of tennis (assuming Novak doesn't play/win Bercy and Turin). It's been an exceptional run, the likes of which we will probably never see again. To mark this, I have created an annotated plot of how each of the Big 3 played, starting from their debut years, taking into account their FHP and BHP based on Tennis Abstract's charted matches.
This is annotated from a Federer perspective since he was the oldest and peaked before Rafole. You can see the Federer FH peaking at >10 FHP in 2004-06 before falling off. The only other time he matched that was the 2017 season.
2010-15 is when Novak comes through. He's doing better than Nadal in 2011 and 2012 in terms of FHP and BHP but then Rafa's FH in 2013-14 gets a scary peak. Federer is clearly 3rd best in this timeframe with both his FH and BH worse than the other two.
I know FHP and BHP are not perfect metrics and especially with SHBH like Federer's, when it doesn't take slice BHs into account but I think it still gives a fairly good idea into how the trivalry (if that's a word) ebbed and flowed among the three.
This is annotated from a Federer perspective since he was the oldest and peaked before Rafole. You can see the Federer FH peaking at >10 FHP in 2004-06 before falling off. The only other time he matched that was the 2017 season.
2010-15 is when Novak comes through. He's doing better than Nadal in 2011 and 2012 in terms of FHP and BHP but then Rafa's FH in 2013-14 gets a scary peak. Federer is clearly 3rd best in this timeframe with both his FH and BH worse than the other two.
I know FHP and BHP are not perfect metrics and especially with SHBH like Federer's, when it doesn't take slice BHs into account but I think it still gives a fairly good idea into how the trivalry (if that's a word) ebbed and flowed among the three.