Only thing missing is a serve which far more easy to get than Baseline weapons. And Sinner Is far superior at off both wings than Alcaraz)
Berdych wouldn't beat Djokodal LOL. He has always been their turkey. And I don't think he would even beat Alcaraz. Berdych was a better player when he was 25-28 y.o (he was outhitting Prime Fed)Berdych would definitely win slams if he was 20/21 now. So it wouldn't be a bad thing if he's Berdych 2.0.
Hewitt had injuries and he was overrun by the power era led by Federer. He was one kind of a player, born to counter servers, that was rendered obsolete quickly. If anything, Alcaraz's variety makes him more similar to Roger and Sinner's relative lack thereof makes him closer to Hewitt, even if their styles are completely different. I mean, I have seen this comparison being thrown around as of late and I don't think it could be more wrong. Just because both are early boomers that doesn't mean they are similar, or they should be compared.People would have said the same about Hewitt and Federer in 2002. Hewitt with 2 slams and world no.1 and Federer with none, but the turning point was age at 22.
Not saying that's what's going to happen here and 2 masters and a slam is a nice start, but a tiny sample size.
I just hope Sinner isn't Berdych 2.0.
How is a serve easy to get?Only thing missing is a serve which far more easy to get than Baseline weapons. And Sinner Is far superior at off both wings than Alcaraz)
You can almost feel anger cooking in him.Looks like SetSampras has found his new player to hate now that Fed is gone.
Federer improved from a 7/10 to a 10/10 in 2004. Forget comparing the styles, it's too much detail, I'm just saying it's too early to call. Either one could kick on and improve at age 22 and leave the other behind.Hewitt had injuries and he was overrun by the power era led by Federer. He was one kind of a player, born to counter servers, that was rendered obsolete quickly. If anything, Alcaraz's variety makes him more similar to Roger and Sinner's relative lack thereof makes him closer to Hewitt, even if their styles are completely different. I mean, I have seen this comparison being thrown around as of late and I don't think it could be more wrong. Just because both are early boomers that doesn't mean they are similar, or they should be compared.
Not according to Ruud who admitted USO courts ideal for his game which was molded from Clay while he never got past R4 at AO. Fact is, even if previous Decoturf was changed to Laykold, they can still resurface (homogenise) it to the level they want.Just can't agree here. Carlos just won a slam on one of the fastest courts currently on tour. I see no reason he can't play well at the AO. It's not like he is dependent on high bouncing surfaces.
As a Sampras fan myself, I find that hard to comprehend if true. Sampras retired in 2003, what does anyone expect? When Sampras was playing he said records are made to be broken.You can almost feel anger cooking in him.
He had to suffer watching big 3 passing big ol' Pit like sport cars and living him in dust way behind in GS count.
And now he sees another one who is warming his engines, and PTSD starts kicking in "Not another fucking one!"
Surely the same can be said about Novak fans at the prospect of his records being broken within 2 decades. Nadal fans seem a bit chill cozy behind 14 RG titles (which will probably last for a century). Roger fans also seem relaxed since their fave's record got dusted before retiring.You can almost feel anger cooking in him.
He had to suffer watching big 3 passing big ol' Pit like sport cars and living him in dust way behind in GS count.
And now he sees another one who is warming his engines, and PTSD starts kicking in "Not another fucking one!"
He is not the next nadal. Such comparison isnt valid. Nadal 22GS in a tough big 4 era.NO!
Ridiculous.
Others have stated the performance difference above, they are not even close.
Alcaraz went from being omninous to delivering USo.
He's the biggest thing to hit tennis since Nadal.
Period.
Sinner may win a few here and there, that's all.
I think Felix has more upside than Sinner frankly.
His best is better than Sinner's best.
I was talking about that particular fan. I am pretty sure that most Sampras fans, just as @BurnsTennis mentioned, don't care at all about records being broken as their guy was on top for more than a decade. So, most of Nole fans are already happy with his achievement and anything more is just gravy.Surely the same can be said about Novak fans at the prospect of his records being broken within 2 decades. Nadal fans seem a bit chill cozy behind 14 RG titles (which will probably last for a century). Roger fans also seem relaxed since their fave's record got dusted before retiring.
I actually couldn't care less about Nole fans anymore. They can believe and feel whatever they like, I can see tennis already making big moves away from the Big 3, and I am enjoying the changes, progress and evolution.I was talking about that particular fan. I am pretty sure that most Sampras fans, just as @BurnsTennis mentioned, don't care at all about records being broken as their guy was on top for more than a decade. So, most of Nole fans are already happy with his achievement and anything more is just gravy.
Contemplating what would happen in 20 years is just silly. You just can't help it to bring up Nole fans in any topic now though, which is just sad.