Joined
·
27,997 Posts
I do hope that you're kidding. I could have come up with the same post after reading a few NYT articles.vincayou said:I just see him as someone with a decent knowledge of tennis.![]()
I do hope that you're kidding. I could have come up with the same post after reading a few NYT articles.vincayou said:I just see him as someone with a decent knowledge of tennis.![]()
Chloe said:Also, what about Murray? I mean, it's a touch silly to discuss "young players" and leave him and Djokovic out. Even the always nice "other" option would have done.
The poll itself blows. So don't whine that this thread becomes about Rafa, when you asked for :devil:
What a cruel world Fed lives inMerton said:Not to mention that in the match against Berdych, the wind was only blowing on Fed's part of the court.
I haven't watched enough of Berdych to really say much of anything about him, however, I did include him in the poll. I saw a glimpse of his talent against Agassi, he seems to be really hot or cold ... also lacking in the conditioning area ... took out Nadal also in Cincy, yes ? Quite a game he must have to take out Roger and his new so-called rival. I expect he may pose a bit of trouble in the future, but we shall see how it is handled.Merton said:1. Gasquet has a good serve when he is healthy.
2. All youngsters will improve and adjust their games, it is not easy to predict how their matchup with Roger will evolve. For example, Monfils has obvious technical deficiencies on which he can work on, you cannot make the claim at this time that clay will always be his favourite surface.
3. Excuses and justifications for Roger's loses are easy to come, i can add to what you said that during the Berdych match in Athens it was windy, very hot and Roger felt like committing many unforced errors. According to this logic, Roger's recent match in Hamburg shows how their rivalry will evolve in the next 15 years, no need to consider the Athens match.
4. You forgot to mention Berdych alltogether.
Actually, no. He didn't. That score did not occur.Djokovic's game, eh, I don't think can cause many problems. Also, Safin beat him 0-1-0 at the Aussie Open, don't hold your breath against Roger ....
Murray is a modernized version of Tim Henman, not very strong, plays the percentages & safe tennis. He might be affective if we were still using wooden tennis racquets and ancient equipment. Possibly could have been a factor in the days of Bill Tilden. I mentioned the players that have the physical & mental attributes, as well as games that could trouble Federer. The ability to adjust and adapt. Murray's serve is a tad spotty, his groundies lack pace and the old trick of using your oppositions pace against them is counterproductive against Fedex. He gives you really none.Chloe said:Also, what about Murray? I mean, it's a touch silly to discuss "young players" and leave him and Djokovic out. Even the always nice "other" option would have done.
The poll itself blows. So don't whine that this thread becomes about Rafa, when you asked for :devil:
All players have had bad losses. The kid was 17 and playing the biggest match of his life.myskinaLova said:Djokovic's game, eh, I don't think can cause many problems. Also, Safin beat him 0-1-0 at the Aussie Open, don't hold your breath against Roger ....
Um.myskinaLova said:Murray is a modernized version of Tim Henman, not very strong, plays the percentages & safe tennis. He might be affective if we were still using wooden tennis racquets and ancient equipment.
I can't believe that I'm dignifying this one with more of an "um"... but Murray is going to be top 100 very very soon. Donald Young is still a junior.If I were to mention Murray, that would be as questionable as mentioning Donald Young. It's just a tad silly to me, sounds like rubbish.![]()
TEENAGERS.vincayou said:How does it happen that Rafatard are often Djokovictard as well?
Then why put Nadal in the poll as you mentioned he lacks the attributes to trouble Federer?myskinaLova said:I mentioned the players that have the physical & mental attributes, as well as games that could trouble Federer. The ability to adjust and adapt.
What were they banned for?Castafiore said:If I'm not mistaken, the thread starter already got banned from this place once before...whined about the ban on another board and he's now back in full glory
(am I right or am I right?)
myskinaLova said:Murray is a modernized version of Tim Henman, not very strong, plays the percentages & safe tennis. He might be affective if we were still using wooden tennis racquets and ancient equipment. Possibly could have been a factor in the days of Bill Tilden. I mentioned the players that have the physical & mental attributes, as well as games that could trouble Federer. The ability to adjust and adapt. Murray's serve is a tad spotty, his groundies lack pace and the old trick of using your oppositions pace against them is counterproductive against Fedex. He gives you really none.![]()
If I were to mention Murray, that would be as questionable as mentioning Donald Young. It's just a tad silly to me, sounds like rubbish.![]()
Oh yes, Sir Pukes-a-lot.Also, what about Murray?
Wow, this is lots of negativity simply because I feel opposed to Nadal's chances against Fedex.Castafiore said:If I'm not mistaken, the thread starter already got banned from this place once before...whined about the ban on another board and he's now back in full glory
(am I right or am I right?)
:lol: He will be the next Sampras and wins 7 Wimbledon titles. He has the same attribute as Sampras in puking on court.Clara Bow said:Oh yes, Sir Pukes-a-lot.
Well they are not that often Murraytard or Gasquettard, not to mention Monfilstard.Chloe said:TEENAGERS.