Mens Tennis Forums banner

1 - 20 of 129 Posts

·
Banned
Joined
·
34,908 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Survival for Nadal. Looks out of match shape, out of match sharpness, and these courts are horrible for his game. But he fights and he got free points off his serve, and that's primarily what won him the match here.

Fish's forehand broke down in critical moments, as usual.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
16,539 Posts
Re: London RR: Nadal def. Fish 6-2 3-6 7-6(3)

:facepalm:
ok time to go to sleep :zzz:
Fish you idiot....stop hitting the ball right at him when the court is open .....mug
How the fuck is Fish in the top 10 with that pathetic FH?
And another moonball this guy is so useless:facepalm:
83mph serve and he does that.
Fish :facepalm: What a useless return
fiiiiish, wtf was that???
the fuck is that, fish?
GTFO Fish
Fish you clown!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,230 Posts
Re: Nadal def. Fish 62 36 76

Fish should join my local tennis club. I've seen 5 year old girls returning better than him.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19,388 Posts
Re: London RR: Nadal def. Fish 6-2 3-6 7-6(3)

One of the worst TB i have ever seen in my entire life
Nadal played bad, Fish played even worse
 

·
♤23♤
Joined
·
32,996 Posts
Re: London RR: Nadal def. Fish 6-2 3-6 7-6(3)

Mugdy :facepalm:
 

·
A happy person
Joined
·
44,904 Posts
Re: Nadal def. Fish 62 36 76

Best match of the year. :lol:


Glad Rafa won this match but he should say thanks for Fish.. Both of them will lose their next two match anyway.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,552 Posts
Re: London RR: Nadal def. Fish 6-2 3-6 7-6(3)

Pushdal vs Puish.
And some users say that Roger's match was "bad tennis quality"
This was shit.


Roger - Tsonga haters.



Anyway, Rafa deserves that, I don't want a WTF without him in the SFs.
I mean, I prefer Roger and Tsonga, because they're the players I like, but Rafa's name is so huge, and he deserves this. (Fish sucks)
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
34,908 Posts
Discussion Starter #12
These courts do not promote good tennis. In fact, they preclude good tennis.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
27,317 Posts
Let the blind moonballing flow freely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pirata.

·
Premium Member
Stan Wawrinka
Joined
·
3,888 Posts
Re: Nadal def. Fish 62 36 76

First set was bad and boring.
Second and third set were ok, some good rallies, not the level you expect two top 8 player to compete against each other, but absolutely "ok".
Third set was entertaining.

In the end Fish did 2-3 silly errors.
It is surprising (AGAIN and AGAIN) how players can play at the same level as the top 4 but then (in the end) they have no chance because they are not as mentally good as Nadal.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,053 Posts
Re: Nadal def. Fish 62 36 76

Dissagree with OP, match was very entertaning, but yet shitty. Nadal also has some "dark" moments in it...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
21,337 Posts
After such a great comeback, Fish falls apart in the tie break. Tennis loses today.

Much better quality that the Federror-Clownga shit-fest though.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
21,530 Posts
Kudos to Mardy for fighting back, let's not forget he retired in the last two tournaments :D Nadal survived, but this performance doesn't bode well for him.
 
1 - 20 of 129 Posts
Top