Title. Considering he's won it 9 times
I thought RG also had the option to adjust the rankings? Not sure it's ever made use of it, though.Apart from Wimbledon, where they use a formula based on grass court performance, all slams seed strictly according to ranking.
He was ranked #5 for most of the clay season, and this question was discussed ad nauseam. Roland Garros was like, "uh, if he's #5, he's #5, guys, we're not re-ranking".He was seeded third in 2013...I think I not quite get your post.
He was ranked #5 for most of the clay season, and this question was discussed ad nauseam. Roland Garros was like, "uh, if he's #5, he's #5, guys, we're not re-ranking".
As it turned out, he squeaked in front of Ferrer at the last minute and then Murray didn't play, so he ended up seeded #3.
No probOh yes, of course you're right. Sorry, my bad!
Does it really matter where Nadal will be seeded in the context of RG? The only human to ever beat Rafa at RG is not playing on the tour.
I think the Organizers said back then, they will not change the Seedings, if I remember correctly. I could be wrong though.Thanks, I didn't remember that. But still the post I quoted was worded wrongly then...we never actually got to know if Roland Garros really would not have propped Nadal up regardless.