[MalvinLuisandy]

It's obviously Yes. Or may be Tsitsipas is good like new "Federer" and tennis not will lost something?

 

[DjokoKing]

No. Federer's days are over. King is here to stay.

 

[The Federest]

Of course tennis loses.

Djokovic has had ample opportunity to interest fans in his game. And he has failed.

Federer is the Atlas carrying tennis on his shoulders.

 

[MalvinLuisandy]

Of course tennis loses.

Djokovic has had ample opportunity to interest fans in his game. And he has failed.

Federer is the Atlas carrying tennis on his shoulders.

Djokovic is not ral champion. 0-2 with Thiem and then he just throw match on GS( He is not that good really

 

[hammett]

It's obviously Yes. Or may be Tsitsipas is good like new "Federer" and tennis not will lost something?

Tsitsipas is sort of a valid replacement for contemporary 38 y.o. Federer minus the grass game. Yeah could be , a very millenial (modern) Federer perhaps . However, nothing on old prime Fed not even a resemblance, FH wise and attacking abilities. ROS and stuff much less. A very different approach to the game. That's the Fed that live on his fan base imagery , so hell have mild succeess in taking these up once Fed retires . Hes gonna add his own millenial base though with questions if hes having "a good hair day " on twitter or sth.

 

[n00b]

Djokovic is not ral champion. 0-2 with Thiem and then he just throw match on GS( He is not that good really

What the actual f**k xD

 

[n00b]

Ok, I tried to decipher that, probably referring to USO R4 retirement vs Wawrinka.

 

[Andrej]

I'll be over the moon when Rogie retires.

 

[swissmaestro92]

when any of the big three goes, it will be a huge loss to tennis

 

[sheep85]

tardism will reach a new low, that's for sure.

 

[bbcbbc]

Extreme arrogance from Fed was defused by Novak. No worries. It’s not Novak’s fault that Fed needed extreme luck and injured/sick opponents since 2008.

 

[guitarra]

Maybe Roger isn't the player he once was. But he's still special with his style of play which is unique for its beauty.
So yes tennis will lose the player who is one of a kind.
Tennis will also lose some of its popularity/ fans because Roger has (next to Nadal) the biggest fanbase in the world.

 

[nachotuerto]

I'll be over the moon when Rogie retires.

Of course you will
All haters that are obsessed with him will

 

[Servebots=GOAT]

Federer retiring will cause a huge drop in tennis popularity as he’s always been the fan favorite and there will never be another player like him.

 

[Servebots=GOAT]

when any of the big three goes, it will be a huge loss to tennis

Just Federer, tennis will gain big time when Moonballer or Wallovic retire as most people are sick of them.

 

[bbcbbc]

Most people are sick of Fed and his floonatics because quality fans aren’t as important as lunatics flooded in a room. Fed floon logic: Bad matches=classic tennis

 

[bighax]

when any of the big three goes, it will be a huge loss to tennis

This sane post will, unfortunately, be swarmed by particular Big 3 tards.

 

[Kowchi]

People have seeing Federer on their bucket list before dying, he will still sell out stadiums no matter the venue, he is worshipped like a god.

There is no one to replace him.

Sinner and Tsitsipas combined could equal Federer, but not stand alone.

 

[FelipeL]

What a question, LOL. Of course. Federer took tennis to the next level, never seen before. Others followed.

 

[BodyServe]

What a question, LOL. Of course. Federer took tennis to the next level, never seen before. Others followed.

It was Safin first.