Nadal in 2013 did better at m1000.. and nadal in 2010 won 3 slams in a row in 3 different surfaces within the same year..Pretty impossible to beat that, only Roger 2006 and Laver 69 are comparable. He faced the toughest competiton ever as well. Destroyed his main competiton with ease.
Dull fans, you can good Laver if you want.
Peak Nadal :lol:Statistically, I think there's a realistic probability of that happening. However, in 2011 he routinely ripped apart Nadal/Fed/Murray while that trio was much much better than it is today. 2011 Federer is immensely underrated on this forum just because he wasn't winning anything thanks to Novak - once Djokovic started to get tired towards the end of the season, Fed started winning everything - Basel, Paris, WTF. He completely outclassed peak Nadal who would've taken 3/4 slams just like 2010 if it weren't for Djokovic, and he consistently out-rallied a very good Murray.
No matter what people want to claim about 2011's competition to make their favorite player look better in hindsight, it was VERY stiff compared to today. 2011 Djokovic completely outclassed the Fed/Nadal/Murray trio when the Big 4 was at the height of their power. An amazing achievement that only the 2015 CYGS could possibly surpass considering the inconsistency of this year's field.