Mens Tennis Forums banner
1 - 18 of 18 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
571 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Because Nadal's game is so unique, that players in general can't replicate in training, or what.
He seems to do much better than the others in Big 3.

Any thought on this?
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
22,779 Posts
Because he's better, was this really a difficult?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spinn69

·
justice for all
Joined
·
21,979 Posts
Nadal's game is unique with his heavy lefty spin so it takes more time for the players to adapt to it. Next year they'll start beating him more regularly.
 

·
God loves a trier
Joined
·
7,580 Posts
His unique game is part of it, players need a couple of games to get used to it.

But the premise of the question is based on an illusion. Rafa lost to Tsitsipas on clay and was demolished by Zverev at the ATP Finals. An exhausted Medvedev took him all the way at Flushing Meadows. If Rafa had had more taxing quarters or semis, the result would have been different. Equally, Medvedev took Rafa's game apart in London, only a bad attitude let Rafa back in. And Rafa's win over Tsitsipas was effectively a dead rubber.

Rafa will continue to withdraw from tournaments when he doesn't feel 100% and thereby preserve this illusion for as long as he can, but the truth is that all of the best young guys can beat all of the Big 3 a good deal of the time.
 

·
God loves a trier
Joined
·
7,580 Posts
Illusion indeed. Let's hope Rafa can win a couple more of illusionary slams next year ;)
Novak won 2 slams this year too, but according to the premise of the question, Nadal handles the NextGen better than him. So I'm not sure you have a point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SetPointDown

·
Banned
Joined
·
3,346 Posts
His game is harder for next gen to adapt to but they’re starting to get to him as Doublefaultrev made him his bitch in London and Medvedev nearly beat him twice despite exhaustion the first time and shit mentality cost him the second time. The other big 3 guys always beat him at this point if it’s not clay so Dull’s reign is coming to an end I’m afraid.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,114 Posts
i think its the topspin, Nadal is quite unique in his style- tough for the younger guys to get used to playing somebody with that forehand weapon
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,273 Posts
His unique game is part of it, players need a couple of games to get used to it.

But the premise of the question is based on an illusion. Rafa lost to Tsitsipas on clay and was demolished by Zverev at the ATP Finals. An exhausted Medvedev took him all the way at Flushing Meadows. If Rafa had had more taxing quarters or semis, the result would have been different. Equally, Medvedev took Rafa's game apart in London, only a bad attitude let Rafa back in. And Rafa's win over Tsitsipas was effectively a dead rubber.

Rafa will continue to withdraw from tournaments when he doesn't feel 100% and thereby preserve this illusion for as long as he can, but the truth is that all of the best young guys can beat all of the Big 3 a good deal of the time.
Nah just missed the point
Which is head 2 head.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,370 Posts
Players before Nadal are 2-dimensional: depth and angle. Nadal introduced the third dimension, bounce height, into the game through heavy topspin, making the game truly 3-dimensional. It is hard to hit deep and wide, but there is no conceptual challenge evolved. However, it is extremely hard to transcend from 2-dimension to 3-dimension. He revolutionized the game.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,650 Posts
Nadal's lefty game with heavy topspin on slow low bouncing courts make it difficult for the next gen or any player from this era for that matter to handle him. He is a product of the modern era and technology using composite racquets that changed the game of tennis forever. Give him an older metal racquet or a wooden one, and he wouldn't even be top 100 in the rankings.
 
1 - 18 of 18 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top