[Tennis Fool]

Yes, I have issues with the ATP. I've put them out. I don't expect anyone to agree with me. That's why it's called DEBATE. Instead of debate I get:

"Fuck you."

"Why are you posting here if you don't like the ATP"

"Shut-up."

Just really nasty personal attacks.


If you don't like what I post, then why are you replying??? If you don't want to debate, why are you replying???

If and when the ATP goes up in standard (my view) then you will see all flowers and butterflies.

BTW, have you seen my posts on Congrats Pete and Richard??? How I complimented the posted pictures of Becker??? My cheering on Andre????

Come on, now.

 

[Chloe le Bopper]

YOu personally insulted me, before I did you

I merely like to pick apart peoples points and make a rebuttle - that is the point in a debate, no?

I feel that you don't honour my opinion, and based on a comment from you I feel you are judging me for arguements with other posters on another board as opposed to listening to me.

I can't speak for everyone else.

 

[TennisHack]

If you don't like what I post, then why are you replying??? If you don't want to debate, why are you replying???

Jesus, Fool, you must really be thick. I've already told you twice:

Honestly, because you tickle me.

Keep up the good work

 

[Tennis Fool]

Rebecca, I've responded to you on your first points some time ago. I just don't agree with them.

 

[Layla]

Tennis Fool,

yesterday we were debating if I recall correctly. I even said so myself when somebody else called you up on your bashing. But you keep posting the same tired negativity over and over and over and over. How many threads on the same subject do you want to start? Didn't you notice that nobody agreed with you about the "weakness" of the ATP? Don't even try to convince me that you're not here to stir trouble anymore.

 

[TennisHack]

Rebecca, I've responded to you on your first points some time ago. I just don't agree with them.

Do you not understand, you have to refute all points to debate someone, not just throw out an argument once and then immediately stoop to name-calling.

 

[Tennis Fool]

Tennis Fool,

yesterday we were debating if I recall correctly. I even said so myself when somebody else called you up on your bashing. But you keep posting the same tired negativity over and over and over and over. How many threads on the same subject do you want to start? Didn't you notice that nobody agreed with you about the "weakness" of the ATP? Don't even try to convince me that you're not here to stir trouble anymore.

Okay, so do you want to join in on slamming me because you think I post "many threads on the same subject."???

No one else is posting any threads on this board. Of course, when I say I don't like Pete, there are problems with the ATP, etc it seems like a lot. But I'm not the only one posting these things.

And, please, have you noticed what I just wrote about what's positive???

 

[Chloe le Bopper]

I dont mind that you don't agree with me.

I just felt that you picked out the one or two poitns that you could do something with and ignored the rest.

 

[TennisHack]

No one else is posting any threads on this board.

OMG!! Please Fool, stop while you're ahead. You're really not making any sort of sense anymore.

 

[Layla]

No, I haven't. You mean when you described how the new balls keep disappointing you? You're being too hard on them. That's hardly a positive.

 

[Tennis Fool]

I dont mind that you don't agree with me.

I just felt that you picked out the one or two poitns that you could do something with and ignored the rest.

Sigh. I don't know what to think of you, Becca. You were the first person to slam me, and then a whole bunch of posters felt they didn't want to be left out.

Like I said, I see your points about the NBz getting to the Masters, etc, but I want to see Slam results besides Lleyton.

 

[Tennis Fool]

No, I haven't. You mean when you described how the new balls keep disappointing you? You're being too hard on them. That's hardly a positive.

Yes, they've been disappointing me. So, you're going to slam be because of my point of view???

Check out my posts on Andre, Richard Gasquet, Pete (congrats). Or should I bump these for you?

 

[TennisHack]

Is that why you keep starting new threads when you lose an argument in the first one?

 

[Chloe le Bopper]

I still fail to see how I slammed you.

You personally insulted me in a couple of posts, and the most that I ever said was' you've posted2343 threads on this" - which is bordering on rude, but not slamming.

Unless disagreeing is slamming.

And I'm not concerned what you think of me, I merely want a good debate.

 

[Tennis Fool]

the most that I ever said was' you've posted2343 threads on this" - which is bordering on rude, but not slamming

So why be rude?

 

[Chloe le Bopper]

lmao you are doing it again

I've given you the benefit of the doubt SO many times tonight, and you still insist on rolling your own eyes at me, and ignoring anything good that i have to say.

how can one be so hypocritcal and not even know it?

 

[Tennis Fool]

lmao you are doing it again

Okay, you're slamming me again.

Rebecca, you're the one who said you were rude

 

[TennisHack]

how can one be so hypocritcal and not even know it?

Truly amazing, isn't it? But incredibly funny, all at the same time.

 

[Tennis Fool]

Rebecca, I say lets agree to disagree. We just see things differently and jumping over Hack's attempts to instigate further warfare between us is becoming tiresome.

So, calling truce???

 

[TennisHack]

jumping over Hack's attempts to instigate further warfare between us is becoming tiresome.

I'm hurt, Fool. You think I was but a catalyst for your "war"?