That'd actually be one of the most on - target prediction I've seen aroundIn my humble opinion it's quite clear that Thiem by far is the more talented player of the two, combined with a superior mindset. When translating these observations to numbers I would say we're looking at at least five slams for Thiem, while Dimitrov will be lucky to get one or two.
But we are not. We are down-to-earth humble people. Unlike certain obnoxious fanbase you are a part of.Thiem tards shouldn't be so cocksure after their guy almost let Zverev vulture a slam. Humility is the order of the day.
I serve the realm (see signature).I went from a Djokovic enemy to a fan within 4-5 hours on Sunday. If I'm temporarily part of a fanbase,it's because I care about the greater good. Thiem cannot be trusted to serve the realm; although, like you, I celebrated his victory on Sunday.But we are not. We are down-to-earth humble people. Unlike certain obnoxious fanbase you are a part of.
Like I said in the other thread - I'd be happy if Dominic ends up with 3 slams. Anything more than that will be a huge bonus. And I think it's a realistic prediction.
Career prediction are the hardest ones . Back in 2014, to say Dimmug would be lucky to get 1 / 2 qualifies as not wrong , meaning most likely 0 , in Mtf , a place for Fanatics - Abstolutists , who most likely throw 100 pred and see if somthing sticks . (gen hate / tardism driven) . And 5 for Thiem seem heading in the right direction so...says it all about this place if the guy predicting Dummytrov for GS victories is not as wrong as everybody else.. I wish at least one person here had my understanding and expertise.
How can I know why is something strange to you. You have a problem with me using those terms in the context that is logical, so I asked you for your definition.No problem. I was referring to the fact that he's overrated.
It was you who used each term, I'm asking you to define them - what's with the strange response?
Never mind.How can I know why is something strange to you. You have a problem with me using those terms in the context that is logical, so I asked you for your definition.
And how exactly and where were you referring to what you call a fact, "him being overrated", with a sarcasm?