Really ?? His serve is powerful but very predictable and doesn't have any varietyGroth
We barely see him anymore and since his shoulder problems his serve has never been the same but yeah around 2005-2007 his serve was up there with the best.No love for Chris Guccione?![]()
![]()
Yeah that's how he beat Kyrgios last year in the 4th set, by breaking his serve and holding his own.If we're talking Wimbledon, then Nadal.
Agree but only if his serve is on. If it is, then he will do very well. Because it buys him time to set up a killer forehand or TIGHT NET PLAY (the most underrated part of his game) There'll be some worried top seeds when they see Nadal in the QTRS...If we're talking Wimbledon, then Nadal.
Groth´s serve is more erratic. I think he is more likely to have bad service game and ends up loosing his serve than Muller. Groth improoved dramatically over last 2 years, is now regular ATP tour player, but i would say if we look only on serve, than his serve is all about velocity, which is somehow predictable and blockable, while Muller can use angles and leftyness which is tougher to handle than pure velocity. But agree with you Groth-Muller are right now probably in top 5I would say it's Groth but Muller gives him a good run for his money.
I have seen Muller having very bad games too. Overall i would say his serve is great on grass and fast hard courts but overall i think Groth is better as he can hit through slow hard court and even clay. Also i think Groth 2nd serve is slightly better.Groth´s serve is more erratic. I think he is more likely to have bad service game and ends up loosing his serve than Muller. Groth improoved dramatically over last 2 years, is now regular ATP tour player, but i would say if we look only on serve, than his serve is all about velocity, which is somehow predictable and blockable, while Muller can use angles and leftyness which is tougher to handle than pure velocity. But agree with you Groth-Muller are right now probably in top 5
i haven´t thought about slower surfaces. They suck on clay for example so i didn´t take it for relevant, but probably you are right on clay Groth can hit 230kph bomb and some unreturnables while Muller´s serve here is pretty useless.I have seen Muller having very bad games too. Overall i would say his serve is great on grass and fast hard courts but overall i think Groth is better as he can hit through slow hard court and even clay. Also i think Groth 2nd serve is slightly better.