Mens Tennis Forums banner

Who will be highest ranked in 2016?

  • Murray

    Votes: 24 36.4%
  • Federer

    Votes: 3 4.5%
  • Nadal

    Votes: 3 4.5%
  • Djokovic

    Votes: 36 54.5%
1 - 20 of 45 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,371 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Well, we have Murray, Federer, Nadal and Djokovic dominating like no other top 4 and the young generation really dont look all that promising. Federer is 30 going for 31, Nadal 25 turning 26 and the other 2 will be 25 this year.

3 of them at peak age, but all 3 also play very physically demanding tennis, specially Djokovic and Nadal and it is difficult to see how they can survive when they lose half a step and some of their athletisism. Murray depends alot on his defensive game but seems to have more options, he is a good volleyer and doesnt make crazy athletic defensive movements (sliding, stretching on hardcourt) but depends more on good reading of the game.

Federer will be going for 35 that year, with his slow declining rate it looks like he might still be around if he will still be competitive in slams.

So I would like to hear from you if you think any of the 4 will still be around in the elite of the game by 2016?

If so, who is going to be ranked highest?

Personally I think Murray is going to be still a good player at 29, I see no signs of him puting too heavy physical strain on his body, neither that he lives and die by his athletisism.

Federer is going to be nr2 among them in my opinion, like Agassi but better in his decline, I see him as a top 5 player at almost 35, always a contender in Wimbledon and Usopen atleast.

Djokovic will still be around but hardly the same player he was between 2011-2013, he will decline fast after 2014 but not fall like a bomb, specially since the new generation will not fully replace this old generation, much like the Haas/Kuerten/Moya generation couldnt fully replace Agassi and Sampras. We will have to wait for the generation born in 95-96 to see if they have what it takes to fill the gap.

Nadal I see retiring with some big injury, his game will suddenly look quite worthless when he loses a half step, despite his big forehand his game depends on him running down his opponents flat shots, it is the nature of his game when moonballing high up on opponents backhands you get bombs back crosscourt and Nadal needs to be there always exactly at time with his full stretched forehand, same goes for approach shots when opponents go to the net. Can anyone see him doing that at 30?

I certanly cant.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
5,508 Posts
Nadal and Federer both will be retired by 2016.
Murray will be out of top 20 no doubt, Djokovic will be around top 10-20. These dudes are too physical to be top players for four more years.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
5,508 Posts
Personally I think Murray is going to be still a good player at 29, I see no signs of him puting too heavy physical strain on his body, neither that he lives and die by his athletisism.
Murray depends on his physical form, which won't be as good as now. He has no forehand at all, and with time it will be even weaker. Once he is getting slower, he can't beat decent shotmakers. Djokovic has a brighter future, although pretty similar physically to Murray. But he has the mental, and will be experienced enough to handle these problems. Murray will always have pressure on his shoulders until he retires.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,371 Posts
Discussion Starter · #5 ·
Nadal and Federer both will be retired by 2016.
Murray will be out of top 20 no doubt, Djokovic will be around top 10-20. These dudes are too physical to be top players for four more years.
Federer wont retire before 2016, he loves tennis too much and his style is relaxed and creative, playing tennis is very enjoyable for him. Also he got no injury problems, I would compare him to Rosewall, Sanotoro and Laver. Players who have fun on court stay around for more time, tennis is play and not job for them.
 

·
Your visions will happen
Joined
·
51,276 Posts
I think Murray will have the best longevity of him, Nole, and Rafa.

Federer at 35 might not be top 5, but top 10-20 for sure and always a threat for winning a slam.

Rafa at age 30, sadly, will probably still be fighting, but surely not even he can sustain his level of play and style of play for another 4 years? People have been predicting his decline since 05. He'll still be a threat at RG until he retires, but tough to see him being top 5 at age 30.

As for Djokovic, he has not as many miles on his body as Nadal has, but his style I think is just as if not more demanding than Rafa's. At 28-29, he'll still be competitive, sure. Top 5 possibly, top 10 surely, top 15 at worst barring major injury.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
5,508 Posts
Federer wont retire before 2016, he loves tennis too much and his style is relaxed and creative, playing tennis is very enjoyable for him. Also he got no injury problems, I would compare him to Rosewall, Sanotoro and Laver. Players who have fun on court stay around for more time, tennis is play and not job for them.
Santoro had nothing to lose by making a clown of himself.
Federer has too incredible records to allow himself to become the "old clown" of the tour.
I would say he will play until 2013-14 at max if he cares.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,774 Posts
No way Federer is going to be there. Can hardly see him play beyond 2013. No way. Rest are up to destiny.They can go any way
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,371 Posts
Discussion Starter · #11 ·
Santoro had nothing to lose by making a clown of himself.
Federer has incredible records to become the "old clown" of the tour.
I would say he will play until 2013-14 at max if he cares.
No one sees old players as "old clowns", no one thought of Agassi that way. Also the young generation (Tomic, Harrison, Dmitrov) are not good enought to make old Federer look like a clown.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
5,508 Posts
No one sees old players as "old clowns", no one thought of Agassi that way. Also the young generation (Tomic, Harrison, Dmitrov) are not good enought to make old Federer look like a clown.
Tomic will beat a top 4 player this year in my opinion. I think we can agree that in 4 years he will be good enough to beat the current top 4. It's not really mystery.
Agassi was not a clown even at 35, but he played slam final here and there. I doubt Federer could play slam finals at the age of 33-34, let alone 35.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,371 Posts
Discussion Starter · #13 ·
Nadal and Federer both will be retired by 2016.
Murray will be out of top 20 no doubt, Djokovic will be around top 10-20. These dudes are too physical to be top players for four more years.
Who is going to dominate tennis then? Tomic? Dimitrov? Harrison?

Cmon, they are almost 20 and nowhere near as good as Djokovic, Federer and Nadal were at their age. This is not a great generation coming up, no one is going to fill the gap.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
5,508 Posts
Who is going to dominate tennis then? Tomic? Dimitrov? Harrison?

Cmon, they are almost 20 and nowhere near as good as Djokovic, Federer and Nadal were at their age. This is not a great generation coming up, no one is going to fill the gap.
I have no idea who will dominate, I admit it. But it's obvious his name won't be Federer or Murray.
I don't understand people. Even if top 4 looks so strong today, you cannot expect them to do it 4 years later. I understand you want these 4 to dominate until the age of 40, but it's the nature
of sports.

To be honest I would enjoy a 1998-2001 type of era in the coming years. Lots of changes on the top, with plenty of good players. Of course, outside of Tomic I cannot see anybody with a potential for that.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19,164 Posts
I thought the World is going to end this year?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,727 Posts
I think Murray will have the best longevity of him, Nole, and Rafa.

Federer at 35 might not be top 5, but top 10-20 for sure and always a threat for winning a slam.

Rafa at age 30, sadly, will probably still be fighting, but surely not even he can sustain his level of play and style of play for another 4 years? People have been predicting his decline since 05. He'll still be a threat at RG until he retires, but tough to see him being top 5 at age 30.

As for Djokovic, he has not as many miles on his body as Nadal has, but his style I think is just as if not more demanding than Rafa's. At 28-29, he'll still be competitive, sure. Top 5 possibly, top 10 surely, top 15 at worst barring major injury.
I agree. And add to that the fact that Murray would still have won nothing important at 29:devil: So motivation will be as good as now. Not that it may help him;)

Ok, just kidding. I cant see Federer or Nadal playing to 2016. My prediction is that Federer will retire in 2014 and Nadal in 2015. But if they are still around, I guess they will both be ranked around 10-15. Djokovic said last year that he would be very happy to do a Borg and call it a career around 27 if he can have one anywhere near as good of that of the Swede. So who knows :shrug:

But if the hypothetical scenario that these guys play to their 30s materialises, I would very much love to see the tards and Fed Haters then :wavey:
 

·
Onwards and Upwards!
Joined
·
46,453 Posts
Definitely Murray. His game isn't tough on the body and he can become far more aggressive if it starts to be. He'll still be in the top 10 in 2016, perhaps even in the top 4 still.

Djokovic's body won't last very long. Nadal's won't either. They'll still be around somewhere, I guess.

Federer will still be around, I think, just very low down the rankings.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,553 Posts
Well, I honestly don't believe Federer would stand being out of the Top 5.
Roger will probably retire when he realizes he can't compete in slams anymore, because now Fed occupies the third place in the line of slam contenders.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
5,508 Posts
Definitely Murray. His game isn't tough on the body and he can become far more aggressive if it starts to be. He'll still be in the top 10 in 2016, perhaps even in the top 4 still.

Djokovic's body won't last very long. Nadal's won't either. They'll still be around somewhere, I guess.

Federer will still be around, I think, just very low down the rankings.
It has always been obvious that you do not know anything about this sport, but it's surprising that you don't know anything about your boy either.
Murray's game is painfully physical. He depends on his actual form too much. Same with Djokovic. Anytime Murray hits a forehand, it always seems like his body will break into two halves because of the effort. Still, it has no depth at all. He is obviously peaking right now, and still only number 4 in the world. He won't be in the top 10 in 2016.
 
1 - 20 of 45 Posts
Top