Mens Tennis Forums banner

Same as the topic.

  • Gasquet

    Votes: 46 52.9%
  • Monfils

    Votes: 7 8.0%
  • Murray

    Votes: 5 5.7%
  • Baghdatis

    Votes: 5 5.7%
  • Berdych

    Votes: 5 5.7%
  • Verdasco

    Votes: 3 3.4%
  • Djokovic

    Votes: 11 12.6%
  • del Potro

    Votes: 5 5.7%
1 - 20 of 49 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
163 Posts
If my heart talks, I say Gasquet! .. If my reason talks it's Djokovic and ... Gasquet :p
Why? Because they can already hit winners all over the court, and can improve a lot in the physical and mental department...

Though, I have to say that I've never seen Del Potro play, I've just heard he has huge potential.
 

·
POWER...UNLIMITED...POWER
Joined
·
5,067 Posts
Monfils
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,204 Posts
I actually think Gasquet does not belong in that group, just like Nadal has left it 7 months ago. He's already achieved so much more than the others, it's not fair to compare them.

I think Verdaso's pretty much showed us what he's got. The question is - will it work? I don't think he's going to achieve half as much as Gasquet.

Baghdatis... Well, he's so talented, it just hurts to see him getting injured every 3 months. I really hope he'll do well, I really do.

Berdych looks like a really good prospect - I'm willing to wait and see what he'll have to offer in a couple of years.

I'll be stunned if Monfils won't be seriously injured in a matter of two-three years, plus he doesn't really bring anything speciel to the court. Nothing that will win him huge titles against the best players, anyways.

Murray's pretty much a Nalbandian in terms of his game-plan. I was there at his breakthrough match, that doubles match against Israel in DC, and was impressed. Still, he's not my pick to win Slams among these guys.

I haven't seen the others play yet.

My pick is Gasquet, but since I think it's not fair to compare him to the others, I pick Baghdatis. It might take years, but it looks inevitable that he'll win a Slam some day. Too much talent.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
13,295 Posts
Potential -> Verdasco, Djokovic, Gasquet, Berdych are in a different level imo. Hard to pick one for me, if I try to imagine all at their best, I think I´d stick to Verdasco.

Who will achieve more -> Gasquet (though I honestly expect Djokovic to burn ATP tour some day, too soon to say, however), and Verdasco will probably be the less succesful (though I haven´t lost the faith yet :eek: )
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
486 Posts
I have to say that I think that Gasquet has the most potential I have said it befor and I will say it again he has the ability to create thing that no many people except Federer and some of the all time greats like Borg. He also has the ability to create such magic on the courts. I think that a great doubles paring would be Gasquet and Federer.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,810 Posts
In mu opinion Gasquet he has a lot of potential and he can improve a lot. He has fantastic backhand and all around game if he improves stamina and mentality he will win many big titles
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
3,208 Posts
I think this is one of that kind of philosophical threads, because the word potential means almost an utopian level . If players like Acasuso, Verdasco , Almagro , Gonzalez etc etc and all the hard-hitters used their best potential surely they would be among the best ATP players , an if Safin used all his potential he would be fighting with Federer trying to get the first position..

I don't like this kind of threads . In any case i could give my opinion about who will be the best player among those youngsters , but to talk about potential is to talk about utopias
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,294 Posts
Verdasco a youngster? :D The guy is 22 in a month and that's not really a youngster's age in tennis, is it? Nadal, Ancic, etc are younger than him. He is certainly not from the generation of the rest in the poll.

For me potential is something that means how good the players may be at the top of their games in a few years. So I look at players who have big weapons most of all and not solid all-round games with a good mentality (like Djokovic, Murray).

I'd say Monfils and Gasquet.
 

·
May All Beings Be Happy!!
Joined
·
12,245 Posts
Gasquet because he has already proved himself on the tour. Also I think, like Nadal he is a workaholic and very humble. last year i saw him in stuttgart, going from one court to another to practice either with his coach or any senior player he could lay his hands on. I liked his statement this year before beating federer that he didn't get to practice with him, or some such thing.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
185 Posts
maybe i'm talking with my heart not head but how bout seppi, i think he is extremely talented he just needs to get more aggressive, when he steps up and attacks more like he did against Ferrero in the Davis Cup he really looks like he has the goods
 

·
Forum Umpire:, Gaston Gaudio,
Joined
·
124,506 Posts
ciccio said:
maybe i'm talking with my heart not head but how bout seppi, i think he is extremely talented he just needs to get more aggressive, when he steps up and attacks more like he did against Ferrero in the Davis Cup he really looks like he has the goods
I am a Seppi fan, but you are talking with the heart. It's better for him with not to have any hype, and so far he isn't in the main group listed. If all goes well he can have a solid career, don't see Slams for him, though I'd love to be wrong.
 

·
F***ing have it
Joined
·
17,660 Posts
Nadal. He could be top ten next year :p
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
7,319 Posts
Wow, I started a thread like this a few weeks ago and got my head chewed off by certain hypocrites on the board for "recycling" topics and told I'm an idiot & should utilize the search feature.

How amusing.

Anyway, Monfils has the most potential; however, Gasquet is the most likely to succeed based on his success thus far. Wasted potential is a terrible thing, but Monfils though quite physically mature, may never fully mature mentally. That is my biggest fear, but he plays a nice game of power tennis. I'd like to see him offer a little bit more variety, but based on talent, size and endurance Monfils definitely has the "most potential"

Gasquet is probably the most talented, but at this point his endurance and body are not quite up to par. It could cost him in the long run, especially against a guy like Nalbandian. We all know how terrible a grinder can make a finesse player, that enjoys making pretty shots look in a best of 5 set match. Ginepri bageled him in the 5th in NYC, after Gasquet made a couple of shots that looked as if he belonged in the same league as Roger.
 

·
Forum Umpire:, Gaston Gaudio,
Joined
·
124,506 Posts
myskinaLova said:
Wow, I started a thread like this a few weeks ago and got my head chewed off by certain hypocrites on the board for "recycling" topics and told I'm an idiot & should utilize the search feature.

How amusing.
I did the original one sweetie and it's on this page and it wasn't me who chewed you out. You have shown other qualities to suggest that you are hilariously biased.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
7,319 Posts
GeorgeWHitler said:
I did the original one sweetie and it's on this page and it wasn't me who chewed you out. You have shown other qualities to suggest that you are hilariously biased.
GWH, I'm a guy ... unless you're female and calling me sweetie.

But, I didn't say it was you ... someone else ... there's many people on the board that ride high on their ego because of their seniority. I've read your posts regarding me, I take them with a grain of salt because they are really quite harmless & not very offensive. You have a skewed perception of me, that I have no control over... entitled to your own opinion though.

Not bias, just criticial. Very critical. I'd challenge anyone to find a single post that I've made completely free of atleast half a dozen facts. It's not like I'm coming out and saying these players are awful, it's more like a reality check. I give respect where it's due.

:)
 
1 - 20 of 49 Posts
Top