I've seen many posters kinda defending the big multi-billion dollar corporation and I don't really get it cos' many defenders also seem to agree the designs this particular brand has are indeed hideous looking. As
Sara X in her post above says tennis is enjoyed best when it's pleasing to the eye and the designs are distracting and not in a good way.
Maybe it's true that the brand is not putting too much effort in the sports (tennis) anymore and choose other venues to present themselves but withdraw completely then or show some effort at least. Not this half-hearted attempt they are doing now. Where they are ridiculed - they showed Dimitrov at the AO in the tracksuit - on the Dutch public broadcast equivalent of sportscenter. Not for the tennis he played but the outfit he wore.
Also to be fair Dull's Nike outfit is decent looking, I don't like the flashy color schemes as I'm not a fan of bright colors in general but I like the idea and they're not distracting when I watch matches of Dull. So Nike can do it, which is a bit my point. They choose not to and I wonder(ed) why.
Same can be said of the white and rusty/brown shorts last year that FAA and also Kecmanovic rocked, I think the pants have an ugly color sure but the white shirt was fine. I don't have as much problems with them as the designs in general were fine and not distracting. But the psychedelic short Kecmanovic rocks at the moment and Dimitrov wore a shirt like that with the same pattern in Rotterdam and the dots track suit at AO and current design of Rublev's shirt are plain ugly.
It seems that (most of us that posted at least) are in agreement over that and I figured I'm not the only one and that's the bottom line.