Mens Tennis Forums banner

What is considered Nadal's best year?

What is considered Nadal's best year?

4.8K views 47 replies 34 participants last post by  ssynhtn  
#1 · (Edited)
I would say the Top 3 contenders for Nadal's best year are:

2008 - 8 titles - 82-11 (88%)
Big titles: French Open, Wimbledon, Olympics, Davis Cup, Monte Carlo, Madrid, Canadian Open

2010 - 7 titles - 71-10 (88%)
Big titles: French Open, Wimbledon, US Open, Monte Carlo, Madrid, Italian Open

2013 - 10 titles - 75-7 (91%)
Big titles: French Open, US Open, Indian Wells, Madrid, Italian Open, Canadian Open, Cincinnati

He does have many other great years including:

2005 that had his most titles won in a season (11)

2018 that had his his highest winning match percentage (92%)

2017 and 2019 where he also won 2 slams in each.

And who knows, maybe 2022 will be his best year yet. :worship:
 
#2 ·
I think 2010 is his best. He won three slams in that year. `

To give some perspective, three slam is a year rare. Roger and Novak have only achieve it on 3 separate ocassions each in their careers. You need a very high level of play throughout the whole year.

Well done Rafa! :cheer:
 
#43 ·
I think 2010 is his best. He won three slams in that year. `

To give some perspective, three slam is a year rare. Roger and Novak have only achieve it on 3 separate ocassions each in their careers. You need a very high level of play throughout the whole year.

Well done Rafa! :cheer:
# slams but on 3 separate surfaces? Makes a difference in terms of difficulty. Not 3 times for Roger and Djok, twice for Djok it can only be once for Roger as he only won French once
 
#4 ·
You have to agree on the best year or highest level... it's not the year where he wins the most slams... or most MS... off clay... ?

For me, Federer level is higher in 2005 than in 2004 (and also 2007), even without winning AO (no little slam) and YEC.
And in his case, 2011 without slam is even better than 2010

For me, Djokovic level is higher in 2011 than 2015 even without YEC.

And so Nadal level 2008 is the highest, too.
 
#9 · (Edited)
Voted 2010 - that's the only year he won 3 slams. Tops it for me, regardless of the players' caliber he faced in the 3 slam finals in that year.

2008, 2013, 2017, 2019 - He has had multiple 2-slam years.

 
#11 ·
I would say 2010 because of 3 grand slam titles in a row across multiple surfaces and channel slam aswell. 2008 is his next best followed by 2013 . But 2008 and 2013 are very close . Nadal completing the canada , Cincy , USO sweep is a rare feat that hasn't been close to accomplished since .
 
#32 ·
I also voted 2013, really balanced resume, he won 5 M1000 on different surfaces and the competition was way better than 2010.

He beat in 2 epic slam matches Djokovic, and without the injury in AO14 we maybe would have seen the best 12 months of Rafa's career, level-wise.
 
#17 · (Edited)
Interesting thread. Its really between 2010 and 2013, and it's really difficult to decide. On one hand, Nadal won 3 slams in 2010 and made the quarterfinals of every slam that year, which is significantly better than in 2013 were he won 2 slams but skipped one (Aus Open) and bombed out in the first round in the other (Wimbledon). At the slam level, there is no doubt he was better in 2010.

However, at the masters level, its pretty much a reversal. Nadal won 5 masters 1000 titles in 2013 (sweeping the North American hard court season), and the made the semifinals in every single masters 1000 that he participated in (only skipping Miami). In comparison, while he won 3 masters 1000 in 2010 (sweeping the clay season), he made 3 semis, a quarterfinal and lost early at Shanghai and also skipped Paris. At the masters level, he was clearly better in 2013 than in 2010. He was also effectively had the same result at the WTF in both years (won every match in the RR but lost in the final).

His 2013 season has alot of good points going for it (10 titles, 14 finals, better win percentage). If we look at major titles only (Slams, WTF, masters), while Nadal won more major titles in 2013 than he did in 2010 (7 to 6 respectively) Nadal won more points in major titles in 2010 than he did in 2013 (11710 to 11330 respectively). Based of that, I will say 2010. I could see good arguments for either season though tbh.
 
#22 · (Edited)
This is the correct answer. If it's a calendar year, it's 2010, if it's any 52-week period it's somewhere around clay season 2008 to Indian Wells 2009 or so.

Indian Wells 2013 to early 2014 was very good and could be picked too, had he won the AO. But Wimbledon's early defeat takes him out of consideration a bit.
 
#24 ·
There’s a good argument for all 3.

2008 he went on that 32 match unbroken streak across three surfaces including his most dominant RG win and epic Wimbledon. He also won Olympic Gold on hard but didn’t play WTF

2010 was three Slams on three surfaces plus WTF final but the least number of titles in total.

2013 was 10 titles including 5 Masters and WTF final as well as his highest level on hard court but absent and R1 at two of the Slams.

In the end I had to pick the 3 Slam season because the other stats weren’t convincingly in another years favor
 
#25 ·
2008 should not trail 2013. If you look at weakness first, his 2008 hardcourt level was much higher than his 2013 grass level. (SFs in AO and USO, won Canada, F in MIami, and three other hardcourt SFs). And then if you look at strength, his 2008 clay level was the highest ever reached. His superior HC level in 2013 can't make up for the drop in grass and clay.
 
#31 ·
2008 was his best on clay(even if in 2010 won all the M1000 and RG) at lest on RG where he was a untochauble and also his best on grass finally winning Roger and winning Queens against Djokovic, he also won Canada, reclaim the no1 and won the OG even he play for first time a SF on HC Slam.

2013 was his best on HC, he won 3 M1000 on HC and the slam he played including sweeping the NA summer swing, winning Djokovic on the final.

2010 obviously is his best year at slams and he sweeped the clay swing but i think he was best on 2008 and 2013.

For me 2013-2008-2010
 
#34 ·
Not to totally discount the Wimbledon 2013 loss as he generally struggled on grass for a good 5 years there but it’s worth noting he played an absurd amount of tournaments to get back into shape after taking 9 months off. I think he played 3 clay tournaments even before Indian Wells and then a full clay season after so by Wimbledon he really needed a break.