Basically:What does it say?
Snap!It's just a harmless discussion. They seem to know each other well.
Bouchard wrote that Thiem could easily close out the match against Gaston by standing 2 meter closer to the baseline.
Stan answered "that's easy to say" and "(Gaston) doesn't allow the opponent (to stand closer to the baseline)".
He was probably a bit offended, since he lost to Gaston.
And Bouchard shouldn't have posted this, since she doesn't know enough about playing tennis on the court. It was stupid armchair coaching, that Stan could simply have ignored.
Bouchard is built like a block, not even close to worthwhile if you want a hot tennis player.
OP would have the perfect Clickbait had he removed the "Carole" from the title. What a wasted opportunity
If you go by that logic, it gets to the point where Federer, Nadal and Djokovic are the only ones able to comment about anything tennis related. You don't have to be a champion player to understand/have an opinion about tennis tactics, especially something as obvious as Thiem played too far behind the base line against Gaston. It's hardly rocket science...carole bouchard has no authority or athletic prowess whatsoever to be telling the US Open champion how to play tennis.
carole bouchard should stick to baking and eating cakes and cookies, or self educating herself about diet nutrition and calories how, if mismanaged, can make one too overweight to play sport.
Well done by Wawrinka to put this silly fool in her place.