Joined
·
930 Posts
Where was peak Wawrinka pre-AO 2013 ?
Where was peak Murray in 2017 ? Gone.
Djokovic had to deal with the toughest era there ever was while Federer kept collecting cheap titles without strong GS tournament contenders / rivals.
Wawrinka and Murray started peaking during Djokovics leading era, never during Federer's era.
MURRAY -> Just peaked like crazy and vultured every title he found on his way to the number one while Djokovic struggled with his injury. He costed Djokovic one additional deserved year end number one and more weeks at number one.
17 > 20. Djokovic > Federer Forget about the style everything what makes people love Federer. Just look at who the better tennis player really is, everything combined. Not in theory but practically and constistent.
WAWRINKA -> Nearly denied AO 2013 and would have definitely won that tournament. He was the second best player of this tournament and finished Djokovic because he was mentally weak in 2014 and gifted Wawrinka the victory with bad net approaches. Again close match. Djokovic would have won that tournament and would have held deserveably the record for most consecutive GS semifinals with 24 in a row. Crazy ! Djokovic had 14 consecutive pre AO 2014 and 9 after. 14+1+9 = 24 > 23 (weak era consecutive GS semifinalist, Djokovic would have crushed that era so much, unbelievable).
B) -> denied Djokovic the GRAND SLAM and second French Open title with a peak that was not seen before from him or after that match on clay again. And Djokovic mentally drained and physically weakened from Murray encounter in the semifinal which went over two days. That year was the most successful season in the Open Era. Only Stan spoiled it.
C) -> and did it again in the US Open 2016 final. What a great performance he generated there again. Djokovic did not play that bad but Wawrinka was peaking once again.
THAT MEANS IN THE END THAT DJOKOVIC SIMPLY DESERVES TO COLLECT EVERY GS TITLE THAT IS COMING BECAUSE FEDERER DID SO DURING HIS FUNNY RIVALS ERA. No complains from Fedbase ! Keep quiet, genius at work !
Nadal and Djokovic are meant to have at least as many majors as Federer. It has to be done. Minimum 20. That is only fair and mirrors Djodals true supremacy and excellence which was never below Federer's. They had to suffer under his pre-established aura, global fandom and idiocy. Keep loving Fed, but never complain again about that.
![]()
Where was peak Murray in 2017 ? Gone.
Djokovic had to deal with the toughest era there ever was while Federer kept collecting cheap titles without strong GS tournament contenders / rivals.
Wawrinka and Murray started peaking during Djokovics leading era, never during Federer's era.
MURRAY -> Just peaked like crazy and vultured every title he found on his way to the number one while Djokovic struggled with his injury. He costed Djokovic one additional deserved year end number one and more weeks at number one.
17 > 20. Djokovic > Federer Forget about the style everything what makes people love Federer. Just look at who the better tennis player really is, everything combined. Not in theory but practically and constistent.
WAWRINKA -> Nearly denied AO 2013 and would have definitely won that tournament. He was the second best player of this tournament and finished Djokovic because he was mentally weak in 2014 and gifted Wawrinka the victory with bad net approaches. Again close match. Djokovic would have won that tournament and would have held deserveably the record for most consecutive GS semifinals with 24 in a row. Crazy ! Djokovic had 14 consecutive pre AO 2014 and 9 after. 14+1+9 = 24 > 23 (weak era consecutive GS semifinalist, Djokovic would have crushed that era so much, unbelievable).
B) -> denied Djokovic the GRAND SLAM and second French Open title with a peak that was not seen before from him or after that match on clay again. And Djokovic mentally drained and physically weakened from Murray encounter in the semifinal which went over two days. That year was the most successful season in the Open Era. Only Stan spoiled it.
C) -> and did it again in the US Open 2016 final. What a great performance he generated there again. Djokovic did not play that bad but Wawrinka was peaking once again.
THAT MEANS IN THE END THAT DJOKOVIC SIMPLY DESERVES TO COLLECT EVERY GS TITLE THAT IS COMING BECAUSE FEDERER DID SO DURING HIS FUNNY RIVALS ERA. No complains from Fedbase ! Keep quiet, genius at work !
Nadal and Djokovic are meant to have at least as many majors as Federer. It has to be done. Minimum 20. That is only fair and mirrors Djodals true supremacy and excellence which was never below Federer's. They had to suffer under his pre-established aura, global fandom and idiocy. Keep loving Fed, but never complain again about that.
