Mens Tennis Forums banner

1 - 20 of 26 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
10,962 Posts
Snowwy just wondering you make evolve the ranking per surface as well?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,635 Posts
Thanks for posting the surface rankings as well.
The clay rankings look for some players a little bit odd to me, e.g. for my team Bublik being much better than Pella. Evans looks also far too good.
What is your source?
I thought you used tennisabstract, which was the case for Totals, but apparently not for clay.
Pella has 1775.5, Bublik only 1311.4 and Evans only 1495.3 there.
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
9,511 Posts
Whats determining who is winning between us 8?
 

·
Registered User
Joined
·
29,284 Posts
Discussion Starter #10
Thanks for posting the surface rankings as well.
The clay rankings look for some players a little bit odd to me, e.g. for my team Bublik being much better than Pella. Evans looks also far too good.
What is your source?
I thought you used tennisabstract, which was the case for Totals, but apparently not for clay.
Pella has 1775.5, Bublik only 1311.4 and Evans only 1495.3 there.
The surface rankings may not be right. From the sounds of it. I will check later today.

I’m trying to automate the whole spreadsheet, so my quick guess is that I didn’t move the clay and grass rankings correctly with the players when they moved in the rankings. That was one of the Things I had to add yesterday for other parts of the ranking.Thanks for noticing. Will check later today and it will match tennis abstract.

Edit: there is something clearly wrong with surface rankings. Look at Pospisil’s clay ranking haha.
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
9,511 Posts
Makes sense mate
 

·
Registered User
Joined
·
29,284 Posts
Discussion Starter #14
Thanks for posting the surface rankings as well.
The clay rankings look for some players a little bit odd to me, e.g. for my team Bublik being much better than Pella. Evans looks also far too good.
What is your source?
I thought you used tennisabstract, which was the case for Totals, but apparently not for clay.
Pella has 1775.5, Bublik only 1311.4 and Evans only 1495.3 there.
With you noticing before any clay events, this was an extremely easy fix. Thanks so much. 🙏
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
10,962 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
10,962 Posts
@Snowwy have doubt on ranking after Houston/marrakech

Pospisil had on clay 1563 before - after 1833 and lost R1? Is it logical??
 

·
Registered User
Joined
·
29,284 Posts
Discussion Starter #20
@Snowwy have doubt on ranking after Houston/marrakech

Pospisil had on clay 1563 before - after 1833 and lost R1? Is it logical??
Correct. Surface rankings with same problem that PortlandTimbers mentioned last week. Its a small change Ill do in the morning, I forgot to add it to the procedure after last week.
 
1 - 20 of 26 Posts
Top