Mens Tennis Forums banner

US sanctioned Iran

1045 Views 26 Replies 14 Participants Last post by  mtw
I don't understand. Why do these mental-ill people do such things? What do they want to reach in this way? It has likely connections with alcoholism of leader of US, because it can not be explained in other way. This man can not leave in peace, because he feels probably the lack of alcohol in blood.
Besides the only country, who should be sanctioned by Bush and his psychos is just USA. It is the only country in the present, who commits crime against humanity and genocide apparently and constantly and has big arsenal of mass destruction weapon, besides some unbalanced persons in governments.
1 - 20 of 27 Posts
I don't understand. Why do these mental-ill people do such things? What do they want to reach in this way? It has likely connections with alcoholism of leader of US, because it can not be explained in other way. This man can not leave in peace, because he feels probably the lack of alcohol in blood.
Besides the only country, who should be sanctioned by Bush and his psychos is just USA. It is the only country in the present, who commits crime against humanity and genocide apparently and constantly.
Leaving aside your concept of genocide, have you heard about Darfur and what is happening there?
as an american i cant explain bush, the never ending war in Iraq, and sanctions against Iran. My guess is bush cant get much else from the U.N. on Iran nor can bush get other countries to go to war against Iran so this is his alternative.

in a strange way it is a little comforting because it makes me think bush is stuck with not invading iran and left with sanctions

Last I heard america is the only country to have used a nuke-and we even did it TWICE. We are hypocrits
Leaving aside your concept of genocide, have you heard about Darfur and what is happening there?
about 200 000 people were killed during 25 years of civil war in Darfur.
And Bush and his scums killed about 1,8 mln people during 5 years. Do you see the difference. Besides you should submit special leter to Bush with the nice ask: ,, Dera Mr president. Please do not arm rebels in Darfur and in other countries of the world,,. It is known that USA is the main supplier of weapon in the world in the legal and illegal way.
Leaving aside your concept of genocide, have you heard about Darfur and what is happening there?

Gee, thanks for pointing out other autrocities in the world.
makes americans not so lonely as the only modern creeps!

or maybe it just points out how awful human beings can be towards each other. Sometimes i wish an alien would come and take me away to a far, peaceful, galaxy.
He wants to give subjects for the journalist from around the world, but I guess there are easier methods of giving them job.
as an american i cant explain bush, the never ending war in Iraq, and sanctions against Iran. My guess is bush cant get much else from the U.N. on Iran nor can bush get other countries to go to war against Iran so this is his alternative.

in a strange way it is a little comforting because it makes me think bush is stuck with not invading iran and left with sanctions

Last I heard america is the only country to have used a nuke-and we even did it TWICE. We are hypocrits
And I think that it is in accordance with plans of attack on this country in the future. The same thing was with Iraq - there were sanctions against Iraq imposed by US and its dishonourable chieftains. It has the purpose of military and economically weakness of country. These present people, who sit in government of your country are real scums and criminals.
bilbo, is that you?
it was clear to me that you wouldn't try to criticize the US in here, fanboy.
when will USA receive an embargo? xD

We should block their economy :lol:
when will USA receive an embargo? xD

We should block their economy :lol:
Yes!

We should forbid foreign ships to enter, or any ships to leave American ports. :cool:

I'm sure our navy is up to it...


See less See more
Last I heard america is the only country to have used a nuke-and we even did it TWICE. We are hypocrits
Maybe you should read up on history a bit more. At that time Germany and Japan were in league to enslave all of Europe and Asia - and had come pretty close to achieving that. Is that what you would have preferred? That Americans continued to die on Pacific island beaches in the efforts to liberate Asia? Or just walk away and let Japan have its way with Asia?
A nuclear bomb on Hitler's bunker in1941, say, could have saved millions of lives.
... USA. It is the only country in the present, who commits crime against humanity and genocide ...
Am I taking this completely out of context or are you actually this big of a goof?
...
A nuclear bomb on Hitler's bunker in1941, say, could have saved millions of lives.
If only, eh? Of course, then we'd be suffering through Hitler apologists whom would be completely outraged at the USA for "ruining" Germany. Probably the same so-called liberals whom are staunchly anti-Israel.
If only, eh? Of course, then we'd be suffering through Hitler apologists whom would be completely outraged at the USA for "ruining" Germany. Probably the same so-called liberals whom are staunchly anti-Israel.
Actually, some people still accuse the UK and the US of crime against humanity for bombing and ruining Dresden in the II Wrold War.
I don't understand. Why do these mental-ill people do such things? What do they want to reach in this way? It has likely connections with alcoholism of leader of US, because it can not be explained in other way. This man can not leave in peace, because he feels probably the lack of alcohol in blood.
Besides the only country, who should be sanctioned by Bush and his psychos is just USA. It is the only country in the present, who commits crime against humanity and genocide apparently and constantly and has big arsenal of mass destruction weapon, besides some unbalanced persons in governments.

Even IF you didn't understand the idea of feeding the bureaucracy which got you there...you don't really want everybody and his sister to have a nuke, do you?

P.S.: The light tan countries are suspected of nuclear programs...


...but I haven't read the story in full, either....
.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_proliferation
.
See less See more
Actually, some people still accuse the UK and the US of crime against humanity for bombing and ruining Dresden in the II Wrold War.

USA and their anglons bombed many other German countries - Köln, Hannover, Berlin and Polish - Szczecin. It is not time to remind of it after 65 yeas after war. I don't understand why it is recalled after 65 years of war. Actually americans and some their allies commit crimes against humanity and genocide. They can consider the crimes of Hiter, Hussein, I, II world war from a point of view of their genocide and make comparison and understand their own crimes at all. Because it seems that they do not see what they see. They killed abou 1,8 mln people and it is crime against humanity. These scums and human disasters ( it is very hard toname these beasts people- they are monsters )must understand it at all and buzz off.
And the case of Iran. These mental ill scums know what they did and they have remorse, which must be deadend, they created irreal world of paranoia, in which they are not criminals and genocides but protectors of democracy. They found the new victms. Russia is too stron and it can be ended very fatal too USA they found Iran.
See less See more
Actually, some people still accuse the UK and the US of crime against humanity for bombing and ruining Dresden in the II Wrold War.
if they hadn't bombed dresden, the war probably would've gone on til the 50s. britain and america had to break the will of the indoctrinated nazis (and almost every german was indoctrinated back then, trust me!), otherwise there would have been no way to get hitlers fighters to surrender. as harsh as it may sound: in some way the two allies simply had to kill civilians in order to demonstrate their full power and make clear how strong their commitment to beating nazi germany was.

sometimes it appears to be better to have a shocking end than probably no end at all.
if they hadn't bombed dresden, the war probably would've gone on til the 50s. britain and america had to break the will of the indoctrinated nazis (and almost every german was indoctrinated back then, trust me!), otherwise there would have been no way to get hitlers fighters to surrender. as harsh as it may sound: in some way the two allies simply had to kill civilians in order to demonstrate their full power and make clear how strong their commitment to beating nazi germany was.

sometimes it appears to be better to have a shocking end than probably no end at all.
Bilbo will hunt you down. You can run, but you can't hide.
1 - 20 of 27 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top