Joined
·
1,068 Posts
acording to ATP
![]()
acording to UTS
acording to UTS
under pressure GOAT
1 - 20 of 62 Posts
Joined
·
1,068 Posts
Nole vs fed Head-to-head tallies
CONCLUSION
the more important the match and the more important the situation in the match, the greater the advantage for Nole!
- All matches (50): 27–23 (54, one walkover not included)
- Not finals: 14 - 17 (45%)
But All finals (20): 13–6 (68%, one walkover not included)
- Grand Slam matches: 11–6
GS not F: 7-5 (58%)
But Grand Slam finals: 4–1 (80%)
ATP Tour Finals matches: Tied, 3–3 (50%, one walkover not included)
ATP F not F: 1-3 (25%)
But ATP Tour Finals finals: 2–0 (100%, one walkover not included)
- ATP Masters matches: 11–9 (55%)
ATP M not F: 6-6 (50%)
But ATP Masters finals: 5–3 (63%)
- Other matches: 2-5 (29%)
MM not F: 0-3 (0%)
But Other finals: 2–2 (50%)
- Best of five set matches: 11–7 (61%)
No 5th set: 7-7 (50%)
But Matches lasting five sets: 4–0 (100%)
- Best of three set matches: 16–16 (50%)
no 3th set: 6-11 (35%)
But Matches lasting three sets: 10–5 (67%)
- Winning the match after losing 1st set: 7–1
- Winning the match saving match points: 3–0
- All sets: 73–73 (50%)
not deciding sets: 59-68 (46%)
But Deciding sets: 14–5 (74%)
- Tiebreak sets: 16–12 (57%)
- Not deciding TB: 12-12 (50%)
But Deciding Tiebreaks: 4–0 (100%)
- Not deciding TB: 12-12 (50%)
- Tiebreak sets: 16–12 (57%)
- Hard courts: 20–18
- Outdoor: 14–13
- Indoor: 6–5
- Grass courts: 3–1
- Clay courts: 4–4
CONCLUSION
the more important the match and the more important the situation in the match, the greater the advantage for Nole!
Joined
·
1,068 Posts
yes and under pressure GOATness is an important part of overall GOATness!
Joined
·
5,751 Posts
Yes because Fritz, Ruud and the other tomato cans are the ultimate test of clutchness LMAOOO
Joined
·
13,001 Posts
Most of this stats were amassed vs Federer, but u know this already.
Joined
·
1,295 Posts
True pressure GOAT whose stats are inflated by simply being really really good.GOAttila Balazs
Joined
·
1,068 Posts
matches won with MPs saved vs matches lost with MPs wasted (MPs saved - MPs wasted)
Nole: 2020: Monfils 3 2019: JM Del Potro 2, Federer 2 2018: Cilic -1 2017: Verdasko 5 2015: Gulbis 2 2012: Andy 5, Tsonga 4 2011: Federer 2, Berdych 1 2010: Kohlschreiber 3, Federer 2 2009: Serra 5, Stepanek 3, Nadal -3 2007: Chela 2, Youzny -3 2005: G. Lopes 6 15-3 (47-7) |
Andy M. 2021: Tiafoe 2, Koepfer -72020: Nishioka 1 2017: Kolsrajber 7 2016: Raonic 1 2015: Dimitrov 1 2014: Isner 2, Robredo 5, Robredo 5 2013: Ferer 1 2012: Nole -5, Raonic -2, Janowicz -1 2010: Querrey -1 2008: Ancic -2 2007: Mathieu 2, Haas 2, Youzhny 1 2005: Mello 5 13-6 (35-18) |
Nadal: 2022: Goffin 4 2021: Shapovalov 2 2021: Tsisipas 1 2019. Kyrgios -3, Medvedev 1 2017: Pouille 2 2016: Tiem -1, Zverev 1 2015: Raonic -3, Anderson 1 2014: Andujar 2 2010: Troicki 2, Benneteau 1, Davydenko -2 2009: Almagro 5, Nalbandian 5, Nole 3 2008: Moya 4 2006: Federer 2, O. Rochus 1 2005: Youzny 1, Berdych -3 2004: Ferrer -3, Calleri -2 2003: N. Lappenti -5 17-8 (38-22) |
Federer: 2021: Basilashvili -1 2020: Sandgren 7 2019: Monfils 2, Coric 2, Thiem -2, Nole -2 2018: JM Del Potro -3, Benoit Paire 2, K Anderson -1 2017: Haas -1, Donskoy -3, Berdih 2 2016: Thiem -2, Cilic 3 2015: Kyrgios -2 2014: J. Monfils 2, L. Mayer 5, S. Wawrinka 4, J. Chardy -1 2013: T. Berdih -3 2011: F. Lopes 1, Nole -2 2010: Monfils -5, Baghdatis -3, Nole -2, Berdich -1 2006: O. Rochus 4, Roddick 3, Nadal -2 2005: Ferrero 2, Gasquet -3, Safin -1 2003. S. Draper 7, Verkerk 4, Aggasi 2, A Costa -3 2002: Haas -1, Escudé -1* 2001: Massu 3, T.Johansson 1, Rafter -1, Novak -1 2000: Ljubicic 2, Hewit 1, wessels 1, Henman -2 1999: Raoux 2 22-25 (62-49) |
Joined
·
982 Posts
Omg, this is so, so bad...
Joined
·
1,580 Posts
15 and 3, 47 and 7 LOL that's inhuman
Joined
·
6,176 Posts
Only in the 17th place we see the first Frenchman. Color me shocked...
Joined
·
2,359 Posts
40-15 multiple times at a grand slam. That's the ultimate test of clutchness. One guy has it, the other is a meme.
Joined
·
8,292 Posts
.. Of course before even looking at the list the first thing I said to myself was that Attila Balazs was obviously going to feature in the Top 7 and I wasn't disappointed.
I mean,who didn't.
I mean,who didn't.
Joined
·
152 Posts
For me Djokovic is the clutchest of all players ever as far as I have watched. There are many examples of it but for me, 3 stands out..
It's easy to look clutch when opponent is playing subpar like Monfils Dubai 3 match points save.
But, when you do that(Refusing to go down against quality opponents under immense pressure with almost no crowd support) in the most important and decisive points of all, is another thing.
1. Wawrinka 2013 match point,No one other than Novak wld have won that point.
2.Obvious Federer 2019, MP save, the margin for error of that passing shot was so small and he executed it to perfection.
3.Wimbledon 2018, Nadal BP save.
There are many more examples like USO11, 10 etc and many mid match points which I remember where he wld just serve an Ace or turn into a brickwall refusing to budge.
For me Nadal is the GOAT and greatest fighter ever.
But, Novak is the mentally toughest(Post 2011) and the most difficult player to cross the finish line against.
It's easy to look clutch when opponent is playing subpar like Monfils Dubai 3 match points save.
But, when you do that(Refusing to go down against quality opponents under immense pressure with almost no crowd support) in the most important and decisive points of all, is another thing.
1. Wawrinka 2013 match point,No one other than Novak wld have won that point.
2.Obvious Federer 2019, MP save, the margin for error of that passing shot was so small and he executed it to perfection.
3.Wimbledon 2018, Nadal BP save.
There are many more examples like USO11, 10 etc and many mid match points which I remember where he wld just serve an Ace or turn into a brickwall refusing to budge.
For me Nadal is the GOAT and greatest fighter ever.
But, Novak is the mentally toughest(Post 2011) and the most difficult player to cross the finish line against.
Joined
·
63,525 Posts
It is. And yet he's as good as 4th in the first one, better than Djokovic in 2 from 4 categories. A bit of an oddity there.
Joined
·
63,525 Posts
People tend to slide downwards for this one if they have long careers. Nadal was ahead of Sampras a while ago.
I guess that makes sense, but I would also expect them to slide upwards during the first years of their careers.
1 - 20 of 62 Posts
