Joined
·
3,402 Posts
COMMITMENTS
1) Should players be allowed to play in two places at the same time (the final of a week X event AND the qualifying of a week x+1 event)? YES
2) Should players who lose in a Grand Slam qualifying be allowed to play a challenger in the following week?[/FONT] YES
3) GS/IW/Miami week 2 events:[/FONT]
GS R16 - out of qualifying; GS QF - out of MD? (current rule)
Players should be able to commit to the 2nd week challengers only after they're out of the GSs/IW/Miami
4) Late entries & SE's:
No restrictions? (current rule)
Players who commit as late entries shouldn't be eligible to receive a SE
5) Doubles commitments:
Both players in a partnership should commit/confirm before being accepted in the doubles list
6) Singles commitments by another person? NO
DRAWS[/FONT]
7) Late entries & seedings
No restrictions? (current rule)
Late entries shouldn't be seeded
8) Should there be a restriction to avoid singles R1 matches between doubles partners? NO
SENDING PICKS[/FONT]
9) Should picks which were sent to the person who posted the OOP be accepted?
NO
10) Should picks sent by e-mail be accepted? YES ONLY IF THE BOARD IS DOWN!
11) Should there be a punishment for players who don't send picks?
NO!
OOP[/FONT]
12) Standard minimum of TT matches in first rounds (4, 5, 6, 7, no restrictions?) It should at least be more than 6.
13) Standardizing the OOP:[/FONT]
No - Manager's choice
TB System[/FONT]
14) TB method: The number of sets given to the winner when the player picks the loser (2-1, 3-2 & 3-1 losing picks) should be a tie-breaker before the SR shootout.
YES
15) SR Shootout: Picking the correct winner or SR of a lower SR should have priority over giving a set to the winner when both players pick the loser in a higher SR? NO
16) PTS:[/FONT]
Correct order of sets should always beat correct scorelines
RANKING POINTS
17) Qualifying points: There should be points for qualifying wins.
BIG YESSS
18) There should be a Team Race for the World Tour Finals.
YES
OTHERS
19) Retirements should count for SR and shootout purposes (64 40 ret -> 64 60 win; 46 23 ret -> 46 63 60 win)? NO
20) Challenger choices: ranking points/entry list quality or diversity of continents/timezones? TIME ZONES
21) Possible exception: Accepting picks 1/2/3/4/5 minutes after the deadline? NOOOO
1) Should players be allowed to play in two places at the same time (the final of a week X event AND the qualifying of a week x+1 event)? YES
2) Should players who lose in a Grand Slam qualifying be allowed to play a challenger in the following week?[/FONT] YES
3) GS/IW/Miami week 2 events:[/FONT]
GS R16 - out of qualifying; GS QF - out of MD? (current rule)
Players should be able to commit to the 2nd week challengers only after they're out of the GSs/IW/Miami
4) Late entries & SE's:
No restrictions? (current rule)
Players who commit as late entries shouldn't be eligible to receive a SE
5) Doubles commitments:
Both players in a partnership should commit/confirm before being accepted in the doubles list
6) Singles commitments by another person? NO
DRAWS[/FONT]
7) Late entries & seedings
No restrictions? (current rule)
Late entries shouldn't be seeded
8) Should there be a restriction to avoid singles R1 matches between doubles partners? NO
SENDING PICKS[/FONT]
9) Should picks which were sent to the person who posted the OOP be accepted?
NO
10) Should picks sent by e-mail be accepted? YES ONLY IF THE BOARD IS DOWN!
11) Should there be a punishment for players who don't send picks?
NO!
OOP[/FONT]
12) Standard minimum of TT matches in first rounds (4, 5, 6, 7, no restrictions?) It should at least be more than 6.
13) Standardizing the OOP:[/FONT]
No - Manager's choice
TB System[/FONT]
14) TB method: The number of sets given to the winner when the player picks the loser (2-1, 3-2 & 3-1 losing picks) should be a tie-breaker before the SR shootout.
YES
15) SR Shootout: Picking the correct winner or SR of a lower SR should have priority over giving a set to the winner when both players pick the loser in a higher SR? NO
16) PTS:[/FONT]
Correct order of sets should always beat correct scorelines
RANKING POINTS
17) Qualifying points: There should be points for qualifying wins.
BIG YESSS
18) There should be a Team Race for the World Tour Finals.
YES
OTHERS
19) Retirements should count for SR and shootout purposes (64 40 ret -> 64 60 win; 46 23 ret -> 46 63 60 win)? NO
20) Challenger choices: ranking points/entry list quality or diversity of continents/timezones? TIME ZONES
21) Possible exception: Accepting picks 1/2/3/4/5 minutes after the deadline? NOOOO