Joined
·
248 Posts
Interesting comparison between Weak and Golden Era competition. I deliberately skipped multislam champions, Murray, Wawrinka and ofc Djokovic + improved Nadal (not just clay beast as he was in weak era), because thay ARE the reason why their era is called Golden after all...
But look at these names for a moment and think about it... Do you really think that champs like Safin, Hewitt and Roddick are clearly better than these 3 lions? I don't think so. Actually, I'm 100% sure thay are NOT! In tearms of quality they're able to produce + consistency, I have to say that Tsonga, Berdych and DelPo are equally, if not more dangerous opponents. H2H is clearly in their favor (22-14). Slam semies are in favor of weak era champs (25-19), but let's not forget that thay had just 1 Goat as an obstacle.
What do you think?
But look at these names for a moment and think about it... Do you really think that champs like Safin, Hewitt and Roddick are clearly better than these 3 lions? I don't think so. Actually, I'm 100% sure thay are NOT! In tearms of quality they're able to produce + consistency, I have to say that Tsonga, Berdych and DelPo are equally, if not more dangerous opponents. H2H is clearly in their favor (22-14). Slam semies are in favor of weak era champs (25-19), but let's not forget that thay had just 1 Goat as an obstacle.
What do you think?