so you believe the actual victims will just stand idly by and refrain from retaliation? puh-lease.
Guilty heads would roll. That doesn't mean there'd be new wars or anything like the loss of lives we've seen in Iraq and Afghanistan. It would create a strong anti-war sentiment.
Are you kidding? If bombs go off there are traces.
"NIST did not test for the presence of explosives residue."
- Catherine S. Fletcher
Even if they had, the chances of finding traces of a few bombs in what was the basement would have been very slim, which was their excuse for not testing ("such tests would not necessarily be conclusive").
If you blow something up with C4/Semtex (or what other explosives that would be suitable) its clearly visible.
A bomb underground would not be "clearly visible" :stupid:.
Several witnesses - including a reporter - reported
seeing explosions inside the tower.
You don't have to on some "eye witness" that was in a state of panic anyway.
That's your excuse? They had the same hallucination? :worship:
Things just don't evaporate. It would be easy to clearly prove even what kind of explosives that was used in this "mysterious explosion" at the base of the tower. And if that BS is true there was truckloads of explosives used.
See above not easy at all when you have 100 000 tons of steel and God knows how much concrete and fires raging for months underneath the rubble. Certainly not easy when the material was shipped of and recycled. Very little of it was tested.
Why did the FBI tell the media they think there was a truck bomb in the basement of both towers? Why did multiple witnesses tell reporters they heard, felt, saw the effects of and were injured by an explosion from below, right before the planes hit? Why did the MSM report underground explosions before the towers collapsed? Why did first responders report explosions and finding "suspicious devices". Why did people close to the towers feel an underground explosion that caused them to flee in panic, before the buildings started coming down?
Why did the NYPD tell the MSM they caught 2 suspects with a "truck full of explosives", "tons of explosives" on the GW-bridge? Why were they detained for 71 days? Why is the report on their arrests 90% censored? Why was their buddies filming the impacts, having set up cameras prior to the attacks according to eye witnesses? Why were they cheering the attacks (confirmed by photographs)? Why did their van have traces of explosives? Why were they military intelligence agents and explosives experts? Why did they lie to the police and fail lie detector tests? Why did the company shut down after the attacks? What were they doing in the towers before 9/11? Why is their CEO an unofficial 9/11 suspect?
So you say that all investigators also conveniently didn't find any proof? Or are all the thousands of people that have worked many months going through the rubble and documenting everything in reports spanning many thousands of pages bribed?
Like I said, the evidence was mostly destroyed. The investigations were not independent. Who do you think put them together?
The 9/11 commission has been slaughtered by many people who participated in the investigation, which you'd know if you actually bothered to look at 9/11 with an open mind.
You also refuse to look at the evidence uncovered by independent scientists (AE911Truth).
Makes about as much sense as the moon-landing conspiracy. Or scratch that. Makes even less sense. Because for the moon-landing there was mostly one organization involved that at least had a small small chance of keeping things in the dark. Here it was so many organizations and people involved that someone would have talked. It just doesn't work that way that you can keep things in the dark with so many people involved.
Case in point: Look at World War 2 and how quickly everything leaked. Even the very most sensitive things like the A-bomb research and construction leaked long before it was even completed.
And that was a military operation that was top secret! And this was even before you had all the high tech opportunities of today to spy on people or even go out "anonymous" and rat out a conspiracy. Major conspiracies just doesn't work. The 9/11 one is borderline impossible to pull off.
This is a total fallacy so you wont have to go where the evidence leads.
Other major conspiracies survived for many years.
Some whistleblowers have come forward.
The Manhattan Project was kept secret for several years despite 130 000 people working on it.
And even if some retard thought out a plan like that there are a million better ways to accomplish whatever goal it had
These people disagreed:
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor."
- Rebuilding America's Defenses, Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force
What about the video by the French brothers where the one brother was inside the first tower when the second collapsed, and later standing just outside the first one as it fell? I don't recall hearing or seeing
There's also the audio of that guy on the phone in the second tower where you can hear the rumbling in the background as the tower collapses and the call ends abruptly.
I'm sure someone would've reported explosions at the base of the towers considering how many people, law enforcement, firemen and civilians, were standing in the near area when the second tower fell :cuckoo:
Someone did! Many did! You don't get to claim "someone would've reported explosions if there were any" and then reject every single explosive testimony by first responders, reporters and other witnesses. :stupid:
