Joined
·
49,266 Posts
In his decline, I am curious as to MTF's response to this.
In a best of 3, he can get out to a hot start and steamroll guys (1st set vs. Delpo in Rotterdam) and finish the match quick. However, in 3 sets, he also can be susceptible to a quick loss, especially if he loses the 1st set. I still don't know how he got out of that Davydenko match last week.
In a best of 5, he can lose a set, maybe go down 2 sets to 1, and still have time to pull it out. But on the flipside, we've seen him in his last few slams win the 1st set (vs. Nadal at AO) or win the first 2 sets (vs. Tsonga at Wimbledon or Djokovic at USO) and see him run out of gas towards the finish line.
So I ask. Is Roger these days better in a best of 3 or a best of 5?
In a best of 3, he can get out to a hot start and steamroll guys (1st set vs. Delpo in Rotterdam) and finish the match quick. However, in 3 sets, he also can be susceptible to a quick loss, especially if he loses the 1st set. I still don't know how he got out of that Davydenko match last week.
In a best of 5, he can lose a set, maybe go down 2 sets to 1, and still have time to pull it out. But on the flipside, we've seen him in his last few slams win the 1st set (vs. Nadal at AO) or win the first 2 sets (vs. Tsonga at Wimbledon or Djokovic at USO) and see him run out of gas towards the finish line.
So I ask. Is Roger these days better in a best of 3 or a best of 5?