Mens Tennis Forums banner

1 - 20 of 28 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,405 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,360 Posts
2000-2009

Federer__15 slams + 6 finals + 3 semis + 16 masters + 4 wtf = 35 big titles (titles 61)

2010-2019

Djokovic 15 slams + 8 finals + 6 semis + 29 masters + 4 wtf = 48 big titles (titles 61)
Nadal___ 13 slams + 6 finals + 3 semis + 20 masters + 0 wtf = 33 big titles (titles 48)
Federer__ 5 slams + 5 finals + 11 semis +12 masters + 2 wtf = 19 big titles (titles 42)

Djokovic has won those 48 big titles in the last nine seasons, winning zero in 2010 and 2017.

Ex-goats:

Borg in his career (nine seasons):
11 slams + 5 finals + 1 semis + 15 masters + 2 wtf = 28 big titles (titles 64)

Sampras in his last ten seasons and career:
13 slams + 3 finals + 4 semis + 10 masters + 4 wtf = 27 big titles (titles 51)
14 slams + 4 finals + 5 semis + 11 masters + 5 wtf = 30 big titles (titles 64)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,027 Posts
On a slightly more serious note though it’s more even between Rafa and Novak than I would have thought it was before I saw the numbers
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,190 Posts
Well deserved, well done champ!

Novak did everything perfectly to get it. Now, as a 32-year tennis player, we can only be happy having him playing any tournament.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,658 Posts
"Player of the decade" didn't win even the single Olympic medal in the 10s, let alone gold which is mandatory. He still achieved much more than Murray The Olympic King at slams and masters, so I guess he did deserve this award regardless, but his award remains highly asterisked.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,360 Posts
On a slightly more serious note though it’s more even between Rafa and Novak than I would have thought it was before I saw the numbers
2010's Nadal is closer to 2000's Federer than to 2010's Djokovic, though.

Federer__15 slams + 6 finals + 3 semis + 16 masters + 4 wtf = 35 big titles (titles 61)
Nadal___ 13 slams + 6 finals + 3 semis + 20 masters + 0 wtf = 33 big titles (titles 48)
Djokovic 15 slams + 8 finals + 6 semis + 29 masters + 4 wtf = 48 big titles (titles 61)

So, Decadovic took over the "best open era decade" record from Decaderer, let's see what Decadipas, Decadassime, Decadinner & co. can do in that regard.

I don't think they will come even close to Fedalovic, but then again, after 2010, Djokovic was still a "one slam wonder" in the Fedal-fandom eyes, with about close-to-zero chance of surpassing Goaterer's (& Embroiderer' golden 15, sorry Andy & Pete) decade.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,327 Posts
"Player of the decade" didn't win even the single Olympic medal in the 10s, let alone gold which is mandatory. He still achieved much more than Murray The Olympic King at slams and masters, so I guess he did deserve this award regardless, but his award remains highly asterisked.
I also don't put much as much stock into this & prefer record book miIestones such as the GoIden Masters & hopefuIIy soon HC majors record and/or DCGS.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,356 Posts
puts the other crap-list into some perspective for sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sav001

·
Registered
Joined
·
1 Posts
Federers decade slam winners: Federer 15; Nadal 6; Agassi 3; Safin 2; Hewitt 2; Sampras 2; Kuerten 2; Ivanisevic 1; Johansson 1; Ferrero 1; Roddick 1, Albert Costa 1; Gaudio 1; Djokovic 1; Del Potro 1

Djokovics decade slam winners: Djokovic 15; Nadal 13; Federer 5; Murray 3; Wawrinka 3; Cilic 1.

The difference is that while Federer overcame a higher number of champions, he faced them for a short period of time or either did not face them almost never....like aging Goran, Sampras, Kuerten or Costa....he clashed for like 3 years (2003-2005) with Agassi....he overcame his generation, which also did not lasted long (Safin, Hewitt, Nalbandian, Ferrero, Roddick) and then he clashed with the new generation (Nadal, Djokovic, Murray, Berdych, Cilic, etc).

On the other hand, Djokovic overcame stablished champions for a longest period of time, like prime Nadal (Djokovic won more slams, masters, wtf, overall titles and head to head during the decade against him), overcame an still absolutly competitive federer (10 time slam finalist and winner of 5), a prime Andy Murray, a prime wawrinka (2013-2017 was a beast), a prime cilic, 4 seasons of a healthy del potro, prime ferrer, and the prime years of the likes of Tsonga, Berdych, Nishikori.
To me, the fact that Djokovic won the same amount of titles (61), amount of slams (15) amount of WTF (4) as Federed,and also won more masters 1000 and finished 5 times as year end number 1 put him above the Federers decade but also, to me , is the best 10 years period ever produced by a tennis player.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,805 Posts
2010-2019

Djokovic 15 slams + 8 finals + 6 semis + 29 masters + 4 wtf = 48 big titles (titles 61)
Nadal___ 13 slams + 6 finals + 3 semis + 20 masters + 0 wtf = 33 big titles (titles 48)
Federer__ 5 slams + 5 finals + 11 semis +12 masters + 2 wtf = 19 big titles (titles 42)
Sports Illustrated writers after seeing these stats:

 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,987 Posts
well earned, a tough as nails champion!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
102 Posts
Fair enough.
When it’s all said done, Nadal will still finish as the GOAT but Djokovic earned this.
Unlike a certain fraud who had his weak era to thank for his decade
 
1 - 20 of 28 Posts
Top