I understand the arguments about Cañas and I fully support them, however it would be wrong to leave him out based on his results. Tursunov did not have to play Challengers and when he did, his win/loss ratio was awesome, but he did not work his way up. Cañas did, through WCs, SEs and stuff. The way he fought back is amazing and worthy of recognition.Canas a Challenger player? Lol!!!
He just played for a few months and should have won all those events with the talent that he has. Honestly..... he can get back to the top 30 very soon.
You should have Dmitry Tursunov in there then. :devil: Why isn't he there? He played two of the biggest Challengers in the world and won both.
It's highly unfair if you have Canas in there and not Dima.
I find the comment about our 25K+Hs being weak extremely funny. What about the futures-in-disguise Challengers Tipsy was playing in Uzbekistan?
And I already mentioned that those Challengers Tipsarevic played are weak. Incidentally, they are also $25K+Hs But Janko won Belgrade and Mons, two events that are a few times tougher than Shrewsbury or Wrexham or whatever.