Mens Tennis Forums banner
101 - 120 of 122 Posts

·
GOAT Predictor
Joined
·
4,021 Posts
If my complicated calculations are correct, we are trough the SF thanks to De Minaur & Kecmanovic's wins :)
If we win our tie, we finsh 1st with 3 wins
If we lose and Ruco/hallso win, we're tied only with Taz Warrior & Normand so they finish first and we finish second
If we lose and Thomiek/slaypova win, we're three teams tied at 2-1, for T/S to win while we lose, it means Sinner won his match (its their only diff) and that Ymer won his, giving us 19 correct picks (13 + 2 De Minaur, 2 Kecanovic & 2 Sinner) and so Taz Warrior/Normand would be at 16 (10+ 2 De Minaur, 2 Kecmanovic, 1 Sinner, 1 Ymer). I would assume ThomieK/Salypova went for De Minaur/Kecmanovic/Sinner/Tiafoe which would put them at 20 and 1st of the group (second if they picked Ymer)

(If only I put the same energy into work as into YEC scenarios :lol: )
@enlightenedth
Good analysis!
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
16,535 Posts
Discussion Starter · #104 ·


SF DIFFS

matches counted : 0
matches remaining : 2

SINGLES DIFFS

00:00 | (1) ThomieK (NED) vs. (8) enlightenedth (ROU) (SR 0:0) - Same winners;
SR Differences: SINNER 3-1 v 3-2
PTS1: DE MINAUR 43 42 34 42 vs DE MINAUR 4-2 4-2 3-4 4-2, PTS2: SINNER 34 43 42 41 vs SINNER 2-4 4-3 3-4 4-1 4-3

00:00 | (6) Jarl_02 (VEN) vs. (5) Sempere (POL) (SR 0:0) - Same winners;
SR Differences: SINNER 3-2 v 3-1
PTS1: DE MINAUR 42 42 24 43 vs DE MINAUR 42 24 43 42, PTS2: SINNER 34 43 24 43 42 vs SINNER 41 34 42 42

DOUBLES DIFFS

00:00 | (7) Taz Warrior/Normand (GBR/FRA) vs. (6) Jaker/wtatourfan (CAN/BRA) (SR 0:0) - Missing picks from @wtatourfan (my apologies if incorrect results up for 30 minutes caused this , but nothing can do now (sent PM right after, and I can't be around today at start of play)

00:00 | (8) alwaysfan/Vitor BM (ESP/BRA) vs. (4) enlightenedth/^bibi^ (ROU/KOR) (SR 0:0) - Same Winners;
SR Differences: DE MINAUR 3-0 +2 v. DE MINAUR 3-1 +2, SINNER 3-0 v. SINNER 3-2
PTS1: DE MINAUR 43 42 42 & DE MINAUR 43 42 41 vs DE MINAUR 4-2 4-2 3-4 4-2 & DE MINAUR 43 34 42 41
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,070 Posts

SATURDAY OOP

Alex DE MINAUR vs. Jannik SINNER -- PTS1
Miomir KECMANOVIC vs. Frances TIAFOE -- PTS2


Singles F DAY 1/1
Doubles F DAY 1/1

Last Names only please in CAPITALS
PTS=send exact scores (43 34 42 41)

Send all Picks to a1canada
DEADLINE at 6 PM LOCAL / 6 PM CET

NO RESEND after 4 PM CET

Click for CET time

Code:
[SIZE=4][B]FORMAT:[/B][/SIZE]
1. Best of five sets
2. Each set is first to 4 games with a tiebreak to 7 being played at 3-3.
EX: CHUNG 4-2 3-4 4-1 2-4 4-0
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
16,535 Posts
Discussion Starter · #108 ·
Singles SF Results

Matches Counted: 2
Matches Remaining: 0

02:02 | (5) ThomieK (NED) vs. (8) enlightenedth (ROU) #SRs: 2-1, # Sets to the winner: 0-0
02:02 | (6) Jarl_02 (VEN) vs. (5) Sempere (POL) #SRs: 1-2, # Sets to the winner: 0-0

Doubles SF Results

Matches Counted: 2
Matches Remaining: 0

03:01 | (7) Taz Warrior/Normand (GBR/FRA) vs. (6) Jaker/wtatourfan (CAN/BRA) #SRs: 1-0, # Sets to the winner: 2-1
04:04 | (8) alwaysfan/Vitor BM (ESP/BRA) vs. (4) enlightenedth/^bibi^ (ROU/KOR) #SRs: 1-3, # Sets to the winner: 0-0
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
16,535 Posts
Discussion Starter · #112 ·


F DIFFS

matches counted : 0
matches remaining : 1

SINGLES DIFFS

00:00 | (1) ThomieK (NED) vs. (5) Sempere (POL) (SR 0:0) - Same winners;
SR Differences: None
PTS1: DE MINAUR 42 34 43 42 vs DE MINAUR 42 41 24 42

DOUBLES DIFFS

00:00 | (7) Taz Warrior/Normand (GBR/FRA) vs. (4) enlightenedth/^bibi^ (ROU/KOR) (SR 0:0) - Same Winners;
SR Differences: None
PTS1: De Minaur 4-2 4-3 3-4 4-1 & DE MINAUR 43 24 42 41 vs DE MINAUR 4-3 3-4 4-3 4-2 & DE MINAUR 43 24 41 42
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
16,535 Posts
Discussion Starter · #113 ·
I have taken away PTS2 , as it appears not being played this year, so we have everyone on the same PTS1 DE MINAUR 31 , so neither step 1 or 2 can settle the match.

Listed below is what you will need to score first points, then GD if points tied.


GOOD LUCK !



6.2.5 TT TB rules

- All matches are PTS (Preditct-The-Score) in every round.
- If PTS doesn't decide the match, GD (Game Difference and Number of Games System) is used as the next TB step.

1. Amount of correct SRs
2. Amount of sets given to the winnners
3. PTS 1-3
4. GD 1-3
5. Tournament Countback
6. SR Countback
7. Countback - Previous round(s)
8. Previous round(s) TB
9. Ranking

PTS Points
- The PTS points are counted as follows:

a) Correct order of sets (CO) -> prediction of the correct winner of one or more sets.
o 1 set – 1 point
o 2 sets – 4 points
o 3 sets – 7 points
o 4 sets – 10 points
o 5 sets – 13 points

b) Correct scorelines (CS) -> prediction of the exact score of a set won by a player:
o 1 set – 3 points
o 2 sets – 6 points
o 3 sets – 9 points
o 4 sets – 12 points
o 5 sets – 15 points
o Bonus of 2 points for each scoreline predicted in the correct set.

d) Total of PTS points (PTS):
o PTS = CO + CS.
o If there's a retirement, this step still counts IF a set has been fully played.

Game difference (G): Difference between the number of games won and the number of games lost by the winner of the match(compare the actual result and the player's predicted score)

G = |(PGW – PGL) - (RGW – RGL)|

o PGW: prediction of games won by the winner of the match.
o PGL: prediction of games won by the loser of the match.
o RGW: number of games won by the winner of the match (actual result).
o RGL: number of games won by the loser of the match (actual result).
Quote:
Example:
- Result: Blake def Ljubicic 63 36 63
o RGW (games won by Blake) = 6 + 3 + 6 = 15
o RGL (games won by Ljubicic) = 3 + 6 + 3 = 12
- Player's pick: Blake def Ljubicic 62 64
o PGW (predicted number of games won by Blake) = 6 + 6 = 12
o PGL (predicted number of games won by Ljubicic) = 2 + 4 = 6
- Game difference (G):
o G = |(12 - 6) - (15 -12)| = |6 - 3| = 3 G points
b) Number of games played (N): Sum of games of the match (compare the actual result and the player's pick)

N = |PTG – RTG|

o PTG: prediction of the total of games played in the match.
o RTG: total of games played in the match (actual result).
Quote:
Example:
- Result: Blake def Ljubicic 63 36 63
o RTG (number of games played) = 9 + 9 + 9 = 27
- Player's pick: Blake def Ljubicic 62 64
o PTG (predicted number of played) = 8 + 10 = 18
- Number of games played (N):
o N = |18-27| = 9 N points
c) Total of GD points: sum of the Game Difference points and Number of games points.

GD = G + N

Quote:
Example:
- Result: Blake def Ljubicic 63 36 63
- Player's pick: Blake def Ljubicic 62 64
- GD:
o GD = 3 + 9 = 12 G points

4.2.8.2 Restrictions
- Retirement: The GD is not counted if there’s a retirement in the match.
- Incorrect pick: The GD is not counted if the picked player loses the match.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
849 Posts
Yeah, win! Congrats to ThomieK and doubles finalists. Many thanks to a1canada for great managing.
 
101 - 120 of 122 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top