Mens Tennis Forums banner

1 - 15 of 15 Posts

·
Faithful Txurigorri
Joined
·
24,903 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
http://www.fawcette.net/2012/03/tennis-lessons-from-bnp-indian-wells.html

Tennis Lessons from BNP Indian Wells​

I learned three things about pro tennis at this finals' weekend at the BNP Indian Wells tennis tournament:

❖ John Isner is more than a huge serve(er). He's moving better, hitting his forehand harder, and is now committed to the strategy of going for broke on return games.

❖ Roger Federer has more tennis personalities than Sybil. If you ignored the RF next to the swish on his shirt and only watched the ball, you'd swear that three different players were on his side of the court in his final three matches.

❖ Women's tennis sure misses Andrea Petkovic because Vika Azarenaka's celebrity Dougie shows she may have wicked ground strokes but that lady can't dance a lick <g>.


John Isner is a Tennis Player

Isner has made a large jump in the last year. He's tried to play aggressively on return games, going for flat out winners, assuming that since he would hold serve, if he puts togehter a cluster of winners for a break that's good enough. But until now Isner hasn't had the forehand and footwork to pull that off. Now he does. Add in a new commitment to rush the net, and he deserves his new, top ten ranking.

That's not to say his game doesn't start and end with his serve. People focus on MPHs, and Isner delivered with serves up to 145 MPH, but hitting the ball down from 13 feet high is almost as important as sheer velocity. Isner aced Novak Djokovic with a second serve that landed short in the box then bounced over Djokovic who could only smile wryly and shake his head.

Also, any opponent with decent coaching will know that the way to beat Isner at the net is to simply hit the ball straight at him; Isner does the 4.0 jump-away-and-slash-then-watch-the-ball-go-into-the-net move (been there, done that!). While Isner is never going to have quick hands, I suspect that in six months his volleys will be much, much better.

Roger Federer Has Multiple Personality Pro-Order


Again, if you watched Fed's last three matches at the BNP, all straigth-set wins against truly great players, you'd think you were seeing three different top ATP players.

Fed Psyche #1 Gets Touchy Feely. Against Juan Martin del Potro, one of my personal favorites, he completely neutralized the big guy's power by playing nerf-and-turf that makes Giles Simon or Brad Gilbert look like a power player.

Fed hit more drop shots than Andy Murray hits in a tournament, and constantly exposed Delpo's movement, by forcing him to move diagonally.

Fed Psyche #2 The Aggressor: Next up, when Fed faced his arch-nemesis Nadal he left almost nothing short. Only a couple of (masterful) drop shots. Virtually no slice backhands. It was hyper-attack-mode.

Fed Beat Nadal With His Feet -- And His Backhand

Yes, yes Fed hit a lot of inside-out forehands, even from his backhand alley. But what made the difference in this match was his footwork. It was windy and gusting. On one critical point, Fed lined up for a forehand and the ball literally stopped in the air after it bounced and moved sideways. No problem. Just shuffle your feet, extend your arm and add some top. Winner.

Fed basically ignored the weather and hit through it.

But Fed's backhand!

Annacone, presumably, has Federer coming over his backhand more and is it an elegant one-handeder. Fed's tactics against Nadal were radically different than vs Delpo -- you can count the number of times Nadal went / was drawn to the net on one hand. Everything Fed hit was deep or wide and hard. The idea was to give Nadal nothing to tee off on. Result: Nadal only hit four (4 count 'em) forehand winners in the entire match and three of those came in one game. When Nadal tried to pick on Fed's backhand, Fed either hit a forehand to either corner, or hit a backhand sharply cross-court taking Nadal out wide.

Nadal said afterwards that his ball didn't bounce as high in the cold weather. That's probably true, but this is one of the highest-bouncing surfaces on the tour.

Fed was less predictable than he normally is against Nadal.

On his service returns, Fed varied his backhand instead of blocking every serve to Nadal's backhand. Some he hit down the line, others from the deuce court he hit to Nadal's forehand corner, while Nadal was backpeddling to attack from the opposite side.

Normally, Fed serves out wide in the ad court to keep Nadal from being able to set up his inside outforehand. But Sunday, Fed hit seemingly every serve to Nadal's backhand on both sings ("How do you like it?") until critical points when we went out wide to Nadal's forehand in the ad court. Most notable was the final point of the match: After sitting in the cold wind for a couple of minutes for a rain delay, Fed calmly walked up and hit an ace wide. End of match.

Fed Psyche #3 Gets Defensive. Finally, only Isner remained.

Riddle me this: Supposedly, Djokovic has the best service return in history. Yet, Isner hit 20 aces against Djokovic on Saturday and only 4 against Fed on Sunday. Moreover, by early in the second set, Fed was blocking his returns back firmly to within a yard of the baseine, forcing Isner to start each rally while backpeddling. Granted, Isner's serving tactics were somewhat different against Fed than Nole, hitting fewer hard ones and more kick, body serves.

As for their ralies, Fed repeatly hit hard, low forehands that landed short in the deuce service box's outside corner, driving Isner off the court. It was as if Isner spent half the match returning wide slice serves from outside the court, except they were forehands.

Oddly, for tiebreaks between Fed, the player with the best tiebreak record in ATP history, and the tenth-best tiebreak player, Isner, there were several minibreaks.

Nole is Mentaly Worn Out.

Not much to say about Novak Djokovac except that he looks burned.

The great strokes are still there, but the energy level seems lacking.

Understandable given how hard he had to work through his tremendous 2011. But Nole seemingly never gets an easy point. And without that extra spark he had to work hard to win against the likes of Pablo Andjuar and in Dubai, Sergiy Stakhovsky

Against Isner, Djokovic got the early break he needed, then surrended it, getting outrallied by the less mobile giant, then was over-powered in tie-breakers.

Nalbandian is Under-Appreciated

Nalby Returns Rafa's Lefty Slice Serve with Ease ©jfawcette

TV analyist and über-coach Darren Cahill said, "The three cleanest ball-strikers I've ever seen are Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and David Nalbandian" We saw why Nalbie was included during his quarter with Rafa. People forget that Nalbandian was Fed's arch-nemesis before Rafa arrived, and has beaten the Fedal duopoly back-to-back.

Saturday, every time Rafa hit his get-out-of-jail-free cross-court topspin forehand, Nalbanian simply took it at its peak with his two-hander, and smoothly hit it sharply down and cross-court, forcing Nadal to scramble. A slugfest resulted. Nadal needed two tries to serve out the third. Both struggled to hold serve from the side where they hit into the wind.

If Nalbandian hadn't had injuries (serious hip surgery), distractions (he owns a Grand Prix race car team), and faced some questionable line calls against Andy Roddick at a Wimbledon semifinal (He would have faced Fed in the final back when Nalbandian beat Fed several times), he might have the appreciation his game deserves.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
874 Posts
This writer needs a fact-checker. Nalbandian was never in a Wimbledon SF after 2002 and he never played against Roddick in one either. Some good insights overall but still, the Nalby error stands out.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,371 Posts
Nalbandian should have won the 2006 AO SF against Baghdatis leading 2-0 in sets, this lost oppurtunity is somehow forgotten and only the 2003 match against Roddick seems to be remembered.
 

·
Forum Umpire:, Gaston Gaudio,
Joined
·
124,506 Posts
Nalbandian owns a rally racing team another incorrect fact. The shit call was at the 2003 US Open semi final.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
27,319 Posts
Nadal in the top 3 cleanest ball strikers he has even seen. Thats interesting...

Ajde.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,371 Posts
I dont think Federer did anything he hasnt been doing the last 4-5 matches against Nadal, it was just a question of execution, everything clicked for Federer in Indian Wells. One small adjustment Federer did and learned from AO to not approach the net too many times but just do surprise attacks, also I think he used the slice only one time the entire match (and the right oppurtunity when Nadal couldnt get back to run around with his forehand). Nadal couldnt force Federer to use the slice to get out of uncomfortable positions, I think it was due to the ball not bouncing high enought, Federer's defense with the topspin backhand was very good (specially since he never defends on his backhand side with topspin backhands against players not named Nadal).

More than anything Federer's movement was extrordinary, he was defending very well against Nadal, always on time to turn defense to offense and willing to stay in the baseline with Nadal and with neverending heavy topspin forehands to Nadal's backhand. Federer shouldnt play over aggressively on slow hardcourt or clay, this surface wont pay back for that kind of game.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,371 Posts
what do you mean everything clicked for Fed at IW.......Nadal played his worst match in 2 years or so
Nadal played his usual in the 1st set but that didnt hold up, in the 2nd set Nadal played awful when the wind kicked in.
 
Joined
·
3,728 Posts
the gameplan to beat nadal is hope the bakchand clicks and play agressive

nadal can do nothing against that gameplan but its hard to always execute

soderling proved that at RG- nadal can ALWAYS be beaten no matter what

he isnt invincible like borg was at RG after 78
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,371 Posts
the gameplan to beat nadal is hope the bakchand clicks and play agressive

nadal can do nothing against that gameplan but its hard to always execute

soderling proved that at RG- nadal can ALWAYS be beaten no matter what

he isnt invincible like borg was at RG after 78
To tell the truth I dont think anyone would be able to beat Nadal in RG 2008, I think peak Nadal is unbeatable in Monte Carlo, Barcelona and Roland Garros.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
23,623 Posts
Nole is finished unfortunately. This is the biggest truth in all this. Props to the article writer for noticing it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
494 Posts
what do you mean everything clicked for Fed at IW.......Nadal played his worst match in 2 years or so
I totally disagree on that. 1st set Nadal gave his 100%. He tried everything , got back to 3all playing tooth and nail and still got beat easily in the 1st set. I felt second set was poor quality.
Fact is Federer simply played better than Nadal that day. Similarly, Nadal played better than Federer at AO semifinal. I felt Federer played a very good match that day but he could not penetrate Nadal's defense at all. Still Roger gave it 100% effort at AO just like Nadal at Indian Wells
 
1 - 15 of 15 Posts
Top