Post anything you want here of relevance and if it is a decent sugestion the SMB (Suicide Board Members) will talk about it.
I think we don't have to limit the rankings to 18 tournaments, or to 4GS + 9 TMS + the best 5 from the rest. The game of Suicide Tennis is very simple, everybody can play in every tournament and more than one players can win the tournament, more than 4 can reach the semifinals, so we just can add the points from every tourney and have a fresh start of the ranking @ the beginning of every year.We have to decide the ranking system for suicide.
I think it should be the best 18 tournaments with no mandatory events.
In tournies I run i don't accept picks from people who send them after the first match is played, keeps it simple and saves my time/work.I think someone needs to decide what's actually going on with the picks deadline thing :tape: I'm for keeping it how it is; I didn't like the idea at first but it seems to work. Not picking in time counts as forgetting which according to the rules is a perfectly good reason to die
I agree, I think 18 tournaments throughout the season can be a good optionI think we should put some type of restriction because if not the one who most plays is the one of best ranking.
The Atp Race restricts to 4 gs 9 ms plus 5 Is.Also i think the ranking system should stay as it is. You don't need rankings to get into tournies so its basically a like the ATP race with whoever performs best throughout the year gets the top spot with the tournies along the way.
I think we should put some type of restriction because if not the one who most plays is the one of best ranking.
The Atp Race restricts to 4 gs 9 ms plus 5 Is.
I think the best shouldn`t be the one who plays more, the one who plays better.
SOme of the managers PM players who have said IN and have not picked a player before the start of first matches, I think Excaliber does and I planned toooooooooo but then I forgot haha. But I think its not a bad idea, it can go eitehr way for me really.I have a question
Why do we sign in? Is there any relevance? I mean you just anme a name for the day day so you're in. If you don't then obviously you're not playing.
I just don't see the point of signing in
a, wtc doesnt give any atp points. its only about being patriot (and the money of course)1.What do you think about playing WTC?
too many changes after the first day. i cant even imagine how this could work2.What do you think about Davis Cup?
same as pts. one for the first 8 in race, an other one for everyone else (different points). everybody can pick the same player twice.3.Masters Cup format?
4.Accepting picks until the start of each match and not at start of day play?
i like it, but this might be too much work for yemok5.Making rankings restringed to 14+5 best others?
qualies? no. but i think seeded players might be allowed to skip day1 (just like at wtaworld)6.What do you think about playing qualies? If yes, run more than one tourney a week?
i couldn't care less about this one7.Do not give tournaments to the manager that commits first?