Mens Tennis Forums banner

1 - 20 of 25 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,339 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
if rafa overtakes federer on the atp race points by the end of the year, does that mean rafa ends as world #1 even if roger has more points in the entry rankings? :confused:
 

·
Not a Registered User
Joined
·
30,181 Posts
megadeth said:
if rafa overtakes federer on the atp race points by the end of the year, does that mean rafa ends as world #1 even if roger has more points in the entry rankings? :confused:
at end of year entry and race are the same.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
9,433 Posts
I for one have never understood the whole points and ranking stuff
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
10,353 Posts
At the end of the year, the top 10 or 12 players in the race & the entry system will be the same. Below that, some lower ranked players will be higher in the entry sytem than they are in the race due to challenger results (that count in the entry system but not the race).
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,339 Posts
Discussion Starter #5
so in this case, even if rafa gets more points, roger (assuming he has more entry level points), would still be #1?
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
10,353 Posts
megadeth said:
so in this case, even if rafa gets more points, roger (assuming he has more entry level points), would still be #1?
As I said the top 10 or 15 players will be in the same position in both the entry system & the race at the end of the year. The race determines the year-end #1, #2, etc, but the top players will be in the same positions in both.

The race ends after the masters cup in November, while the entry system continues on only taking the last two weeks of the year off (50 out of 52 weeks of the year).
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
286 Posts
At the end of the season, assuming that a player only plays at ATP Tour-level events and none at all of Challengers, Futures etc, the tournament results that go toward his Race points and his Entry points are EXACTLY THE SAME. In reality, the Top 10/12 players and most of the Top 40 players should be in this category.

At the very top of the rankings, e.g. Top 5-8, the year-end Race and the year-end Entry standings are completely identical. So it will be completely impossible, at this point, to have Nadal as the year-end Race No. 1 and Federer the year-end Entry No. 1.

This year, the only minor change in the Top 15 between the Race and the Entry year-end rankings might be Puerta, who has some Entry points from Challengers that will probably go into his Entry points total, but are, of course, not included in the Race total.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,573 Posts
so now the race points between nadal and federer are very close,
there might be a chance that nadal overtake federer to become no.1 end of this year.

this has been discussed since nadal has won the french open, but not many people think that is going to happen because many of us dont believe nadal could produce good results in hard court

but now, situation is different.
nadal has won in montreal, making many of us to rethink this matter again.

although i know many people here still think nadal won because federer wasnt there (which is actually one of the factor, but didnt mean nadal cannot play well on hardcourt)... nadal is in fact a dangerous player on hardcourt, he could win against anybody, imo, roddick, safin, or even hewitt and federer...

federer needs to be very careful now, and fight to keep his no.1 position till end of year....
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,671 Posts
During the course of the year you have to look at the Entry Rank points to know the true rankings, so why bother questioning that? The ATP race status doesn't reflect the true rankings until the very end of the year but by then isn't it just as easy to look at the Entry Rank list?

I don't see where the confusion is.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,671 Posts
jenanun said:
so now the race points between nadal and federer are very close, there might be a chance that nadal overtake federer to become no.1 end of this year.
Yes, there is a chance for Nadal. The remaining tournaments are all important. It could be so close that we wouldn't know until the very end of the year. I wonder when the last time was that the #1 and #2 both had won this many tournaments and had this many points?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,573 Posts
and when was the last time, that all TMS titles (6 of them so far) and GS (apart from AO) are shared by only 2 players!

nadal and federer are soooooooo good and ahead of all other players!
Safin, had done a great job in stealing one of those titles from them! haha!!!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
9,433 Posts
jenanun said:
and when was the last time, that all TMS titles (6 of them so far) and GS (apart from AO) are shared by only 2 players!

nadal and federer are soooooooo good and ahead of all other players!
Safin, had done a great job in stealing one of those titles from them! haha!!!
:worship: The others need to step up big time
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,671 Posts
jenanun said:
and when was the last time, that all TMS titles (6 of them so far) and GS (apart from AO) are shared by only 2 players!

nadal and federer are soooooooo good and ahead of all other players!
Safin, had done a great job in stealing one of those titles from them! haha!!!
Well I would be interested to know when the last time was that both the #1 and #2 player had each won 8 tournaments including 3 TMS and 1 Major each by this time in the year? When ever did they both have this many points by this time......because so often there are discussions about comparing the rivalries and the depth of the field between then and now.

In Sampras time was there ever such a strong #2 player ? In 1995 Sampras only won 5 tournaments (including Wimby and USO). It's just interesting to think a player then wouldn't have to play constantly through out the year....he could concentrate on winning two majors and that alone would be enough.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,402 Posts
PamV said:
In Sampras time was there ever such a strong #2 player ? In 1995 Sampras only won 5 tournaments (including Wimby and USO). It's just interesting to think a player then wouldn't have to play constantly through out the year....he could concentrate on winning two majors and that alone would be enough.
Well, Sampras couldn't really afford to win only 5 in 1995 (even though two of them were slams) and paid the price. Muster won 12 tournaments that year, and that enabled him to overtake Sampras for the top spot during 1996.

If Federer doesn't do well enough at Cincy/USO and during the autumn, he may well pay a similar price after the Australian Open 2006.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,490 Posts
We were expecting a great rivalry... here we are !!
Marat-Hewitt-Roddick might have some headaches these days with these 2 guys dominating the tour so much... And Nadal is not supposed to be "At peak" ! Imagine...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
489 Posts
Does the entry ranking system also resets back to zero at the beginning of the year like the atp race? I'm really confuse with these two
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,402 Posts
peteslamz said:
Does the entry ranking system also resets back to zero at the beginning of the year like the atp race? I'm really confuse with these two
No, the entry ranking holds the last 52 weeks' results.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
489 Posts
jtipson said:
No, the entry ranking holds the last 52 weeks' results.

they said that at the end of the year, the order of the entry ranking would just be the same with the entry race. how could this happen if the entry ranking will consider the 52 wk's result whie as the entry race will not?

For intance, federer played really well last year therfore he had a huge gap in the entry ranking, while nadal had a mediocre/poor performace. how can nadal surpass or tie federer's entry ranking points if the system will still hold the last 52 wks results?

sorry...but im really really confuse :eek:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,573 Posts
peteslamz said:
they said that at the end of the year, the order of the entry ranking would just be the same with the entry race. how could this happen if the entry ranking will consider the 52 wk's result whie as the entry race will not?
i m not expert in this area
but i think i can answer this question

coz end of year, that is, after 52 weeks,
all the points from the entry ranking will be the 52 weeks of that year
i.e. no points left from the previous year

that's why END OF YEAR, the entry ranking will be the same as race.....
 
1 - 20 of 25 Posts
Top