Mens Tennis Forums banner
1 - 18 of 18 Posts

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,472 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 · (Edited)
Bryans were up a set AND a break yet somehow it went to a Match TB


forgive me but if you're an American tennis fan, it's hard not to pay attention to this one. Four great guys on the court, not necessarily four great tennis players though (in fact one is borderline horrible!).
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
192 Posts
bryans are lame. so boring to watch. at least other doubles specialists like paes and knowles have some flair. bryans are all big serves and gay chest bumping.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
95,412 Posts
bryans are lame. so boring to watch. at least other doubles specialists like paes and knowles have some flair. bryans are all big serves and gay chest bumping.
They suck gay nuts dont they
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,472 Posts
Discussion Starter · #10 ·
bryans are lame. so boring to watch. at least other doubles specialists like paes and knowles have some flair. bryans are all big serves and gay chest bumping.
the only thing that makes sense in above comment is that you OBVIOUSLY DON'T watch them since you think they are boring. Perhaps if you didn't have a preconceived notion of their boringness, you would watch and actually learn something about tennis.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,750 Posts
Good effort from the young guys. :worship:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
192 Posts
the only thing that makes sense in above comment is that you OBVIOUSLY DON'T watch them since you think they are boring. Perhaps if you didn't have a preconceived notion of their boringness, you would watch and actually learn something about tennis.
I have watched them many times, and I especially enjoy watching them lose. Who are you to tell me what I should or should not think is boring? I'm sorry, I don't care for big serving oafs who can't hit decent groundstrokes. What exactly am I supposed to have learned from watching these oafs, that big serves and good volleys are effective in doubles? That neither one of them is more than a mediocre player? That they make lots of cash playing a pro doubles game that no one cares about?

I think they are boring, and their lame antics are super gay.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,750 Posts
I have watched them many times, and I especially enjoy watching them lose. Who are you to tell me what I should or should not think is boring? I'm sorry, I don't care for big serving oafs who can't hit decent groundstrokes. What exactly am I supposed to have learned from watching these oafs, that big serves and good volleys are effective in doubles? That neither one of them is more than a mediocre player? That they make lots of cash playing a pro doubles game that no one cares about?

I think they are boring, and their lame antics are super gay.
Their "lame antics" have gotten them to number 1 one the world, I hope they keep it up.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
9,868 Posts
I have watched them many times, and I especially enjoy watching them lose. Who are you to tell me what I should or should not think is boring? I'm sorry, I don't care for big serving oafs who can't hit decent groundstrokes. What exactly am I supposed to have learned from watching these oafs, that big serves and good volleys are effective in doubles? That neither one of them is more than a mediocre player? That they make lots of cash playing a pro doubles game that no one cares about?

I think they are boring, and their lame antics are super gay.
:scratch: As opposed to slow serves and multiple double faults and weak volleys being equally effective? You're not making any sense. :confused:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
596 Posts
If the Bryans were only big serves and crappy ground strokes they would never have achieved as much as they have.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,472 Posts
Discussion Starter · #16 ·
I have watched them many times, and I especially enjoy watching them lose. Who are you to tell me what I should or should not think is boring? I'm sorry, I don't care for big serving oafs who can't hit decent groundstrokes. What exactly am I supposed to have learned from watching these oafs, that big serves and good volleys are effective in doubles? That neither one of them is more than a mediocre player? That they make lots of cash playing a pro doubles game that no one cares about?

I think they are boring, and their lame antics are super gay.
:haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::retard:
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
9,868 Posts
Dimonator, I'm glad you see the ridiculousness in that post. :lol: :worship:

What exactly am I supposed to have learned from watching these oafs, that big serves and good volleys are effective in doubles?

YES, BIG SERVES AND GOOD VOLLEYS ARE EFFECTIVE IN DOUBLES.... in fact, big serves and effective volleys can be effective in singles. :retard:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
192 Posts
God, thanks for pointing that out captain obvious. The sarcasm in my post was clearly missed, because all those things I said were facts. One was in response to dude saying I need to watch the Bryans to "learn about tennis". What am I supposed to learn when everything about the Bryans is right up front in the open? There is nothing subtle about cranking big serves and coming up to the net to volley off the return. The other two things I mentioned were just little jabs. I will try not to be so vague next time :).
 
1 - 18 of 18 Posts
Top