Is it a good idea to give players two serving games in a row in the 5th set once its reached 7-6? In tournaments without tie break, of course.
This would let both players alternate being in advantage or disavantage on the set.
Yes, you deserve to start first.
But it cannot be a "punishment" to the other player to be playing always to stay in the match in the decider.
This player will always have the vantage to break until 86, but after this its become nobody's advantage.
amazing idea.... what about serving 2nd in let´s say 4th set when you also are under pressure when you are down 2 sets to 1 and serving 2nd - i don´t know what are the numbers for 5th set if it´s goes beyond 6 all who wins how many times - 1st serving player has huge advantage but no changes please