Cites "medical reasons". Sits at #129 in the ATP rankings with nothing on the schedule and AO qualification on the line.
I don't know anything more than this. Also in swiss newspapers it says just "medical reasons".
I will write Wawrinka an SMS later, but I don't have his number.
Solid is a career for someone who reached one R4 at Wimbledon, won a tournament ATP 250, 17 challenger titles in singles and doubles and has one win over a top 20 player. That is solid.
Stans career was and is outstanding. He won three Grand Slam titles beating two of the three best players of all time with offensive shotmaking from the baseline which is still unmatched.
I don’t think Wawrinka’s career is outstanding. I think it’s pretty solid.Solid is a career for someone who reached one R4 at Wimbledon, won a tournament ATP 250, 17 challenger titles in singles and doubles and has one win over a top 20 player. That is solid.
Stans career was and is outstanding. He won three Grand Slam titles beating two of the three best players of all time with offensive shotmaking from the baseline which is still unmatched.
Calling the Big3 "Outstanding" makes it sound like you're underselling them. I'd rate their achievements as "phenomenal" or "exceptional" and I suspect you do as well.Federer, Nadal and Djokovic have outstanding careers.