Mens Tennis Forums banner

21 - 35 of 35 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
35 Posts
Well he has a better chance to win GS's in his 40s, than Nadal has lol.
And this is coming from a person who hates Federer the most, followed by Nadal and Djokovic.
Haha 😁.. Before commenting rafa ...he already win 5 slams.. Not like clueless goat...goat fed... No hatred on Novak... I like fed but his fans feeling roger goat.. But he can't on Wimbledon...👍 they always feels jealousy on rafa clay achievements...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
35 Posts
Well he has a better chance to win GS's in his 40s, than Nadal has lol.
And this is coming from a person who hates Federer the most, followed by Nadal and Djokovic.
Haha 😁.. Before commenting rafa ...he already win 5 slams.. Not like clueless goat...goat fed... No hatred on Novak... I like fed but his fans feeling roger goat.. But he can't on Wimbledon...👍 they always feels jealousy on rafa clay achievements...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,070 Posts
Even with 22 slams, Fed's record is not safe. And 70% of his slams are opportunistic (against mugs) anyway. So he better skip or tank slams and give it all at the Olympics if he wants to be taken seriously in the GOAT race.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,105 Posts
The whole concept of "if he wins X more slams his record is safe" is pointless bunk.

Records like that are never safe. The only safe records are things like the grand slam triple crown (won last by Ken Rosewall in 1956) such records are safe because no one is even trying to break them any more.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,280 Posts
Roger will have his chances in the next 2 Wimbys as favourite, could contend for 1 Aussy IMO

So 22 is not bold , out of question or tarding, but objective
 
21 - 35 of 35 Posts
Top