Mens Tennis Forums banner

1 - 20 of 136 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
20,932 Posts
Discussion Starter #1 (Edited)
Top historic H2Hs ranked in order of total meetings (active in bold):


1. Nadal 23-19 Djokovic 42
2. Lendl 21-15 McEnroe 36
3. Lendl 22-13 Connors 35
3. Becker 25-10 Edberg 35
5. McEnroe 20-14 Connors 34
5. Sampras 20-14 Agassi 34
5. Federer 18-16 Djokovic 34
8. Nadal 23-10 Federer 33
9. Nadal 22-6 Ferrer 28
10. Edberg 14-13 Lendl 27
10. Federer 18-9 Hewitt 27
12. Courier 12-12 Chang 24
12. Nastase 13-11 Connors 24
12. Federer 21-3 Roddick 24
15. Borg 15-8 Connors 23
16. Lendl 15-7 Wilander 22
16. Agassi 15-7 Chang 22
16. Borg 17-5 Vilas 22
16. Sampras 18-4 Martin 22
20. Lendl 11-10 Becker 21
20. Murray 11-10 Federer 21
20. Edberg 12-9 Chang 21
20. Connors 15-6 Gerulaitis 21
20. Connors 17-4 Tanner 21
20. Nadal 18-3 Berdych 21
20. Federer 19-2 Davydenko 21
27. Wilander 11-9 Edberg 20
27. Sampras 12-8 Chang 20
27. Djokovic 12-8 Murray 20
27. Laver 13-7 Rosewall 20
27. Federer 15-5 Del Potro 20
27. Sampras 16-4 Courier 20
27. Nadal 15-5 Murray 20


Closing in:

Djokovic 15-3 Wawrinka 18
Federer 12-6 Berdych 18
Djokovic 12-5 Ferrer 17
Federer 16-1 Soderling 17
Djokovic 14-2 Berdych 16
Djokovic 11-5 Tsonga 16
Federer 13-3 Haas 16
Federer 15-0 Youzhny 15
Ferrer 15-0 Almagro 15
Murray 8-6 Wawrinka 14
Federer 9-5 Tsonga 14
Djokovic 11-3 Del Potro 14
Nadal 13-1 Verdasco 14
Federer 14-0 Nieminen 14
Federer 14-0 Ferrer 14


Let me know any I missed > 20.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,120 Posts
Re: Top Open Era Match-ups. Nadal-Djokovic already #6.

Incredible how much Novak closed the gap in his H2H against both Rafa and Roger in only one year.It took him time to mature (2 years and some painful losses against both of them)but what a way to reverse things.
I like the fact that someone finally stepped it up, took it from Nadal and found a way to own him but in the same time it'd be more interesting if Rafa manages to win a big match once in a while.Otherwise, it'll end up like the Fedal's rivalry : had the potential to become the biggest one ever but flopped.

Sidenote : 13. Federer 21-2 Roddick 23
I can't :sobbing:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
9,716 Posts
Re: Top Open Era Match-ups. Nadal-Djokovic already #6.

very interest post
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
23,623 Posts
Re: Top Open Era Match-ups. Nadal-Djokovic already #6.

And they might even reach 36 this year
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,822 Posts
Re: Top Open Era Match-ups. Nadal-Djokovic already #6.

I wonder how Federer feels watching the Djoker destroy Nadal time and time again? On Sunday Nadal will probably get his revenge though.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
17,775 Posts
Re: Top Open Era Match-ups. Nadal-Djokovic already #6.

Wow. Roddick's the only one on that list that failed to win more than twice.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
13,904 Posts
Re: Top Open Era Match-ups. Nadal-Djokovic already #6.

With the ATP promoting the usual faces through surface homogenisation and slower courts, we are primed to start seeing rivalvies as big (in terms of numbers) as the ones during the times of Rod Laver.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,663 Posts
Re: Top Open Era Match-ups. Nadal-Djokovic already #6.

Ouch for Roddick :p

And even though Nadal leads the matchup vs Nole, I think with the way the 2011 season went, that matchup has now certainly become even.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
88 Posts
Re: Top Open Era Match-ups. Nadal-Djokovic already #6.

One more and you'll have it :) They've played 19 times. 11-8 in Roger's favour.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
226 Posts
Re: Top Open Era Match-ups. Nadal-Djokovic already #6.

Wow... Connors losing to practically anyone? That is very interesting stat...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
20,932 Posts
Discussion Starter #13
Re: Top Open Era Match-ups. Nadal-Djokovic already #6. Fedal up to #7. Fed-Rod up to

The great Federer-Roddick "rivalry" is heading for the top 10. :lol:

Poor Andy. Imagine what a legend he'd be if Fed had chosen football over tennis.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
12,644 Posts
Re: Top Open Era Match-ups. Nadal-Djokovic already #6. Fedal up to #7. Fed-Rod up to

the fact is that Rog was def. a baby Nole ... Rog in his prime and again Nole who was just a young kitten. Nadal also developed early and he was able to beat young Novak. Now, catch me now if you can... I think that Djokovic will close the gap with both Rog and Rafa at the end of his career ....
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
20,932 Posts
Discussion Starter #15
Re: Top Open Era Match-ups. Nadal-Djokovic already #6. Fedal up to #7. Fed-Rod up to

At this rate Nadal-Djokovic will be #1 rivalry of all time by the end of the year. They might catch Sampras-Agassi by the end of the clay season.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,184 Posts
Re: Top Open Era Match-ups. Nadal-Djokovic already #6. Fedal up to #7. Fed-Rod up to

Will Nadal/Djoker reach the 50 matches mark?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15,791 Posts
Re: Top Open Era Match-ups. Nadal-Djokovic already #6.

Wow... Connors losing to practically anyone? That is very interesting stat...
because he played for so long I guess.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
18,509 Posts
Re: Top Open Era Match-ups. Nadal-Djokovic already #6. Fedal up to #7. Fed-Rod up to

Olderer - Rodmug being on the list is a disgrace. As Martina Hingis used to say: "What rivalry, I win all the matches".
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,073 Posts
Re: Top Open Era Match-ups. Nadal-Djokovic already #6. Fedal up to #7. Fed-Rod up to

At this rate Nadal-Djokovic will be #1 rivalry of all time by the end of the year. They might catch Sampras-Agassi by the end of the clay season.
Go somewhere and check how many times Laver played against Rosewall (for example).. then you will use Open era instead of all time

And they will never be #1 rivalry because this poor era, they can play 60 matches if they continue like this
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,907 Posts
Re: Top Open Era Match-ups. Nadal-Djokovic already #6. Fedal up to #7. Fed-Rod up to

At this rate Nadal-Djokovic will be #1 rivalry of all time by the end of the year. They might catch Sampras-Agassi by the end of the clay season.
I play with my brother 2-3 times/month, considering we´ve played for 20 years, that´s a lot of matches, but it hardly qualifies as a rivalry.

It doesn´t matter how many matches Nadal and Djokovic play, a rivalry is something else. A good rivalry requires an entertaining match-up, personalities, real competition and fire instead of exchanging polite and meaningless comments. McEnroe-Borg was a rivalry. So was McEnroe and Connors, or Edberg-Becker, Sampras-Agassi. Djokovic and Nadal are not even close.

It´s not all their fault though, surface homogenization practically prevents any interesting match-ups that might have a chance to develop into a proper rivalry.
 
1 - 20 of 136 Posts
Top