[17-6-302]

For Rafa fans :

A)Rafa ending up with 20 slams, Roger with 21 slams
B)Rafa ending with 18 slams, Roger with 17 slams

For Fed fans :

A)Federer ending with 20 slams, Rafa with 21 slams
B)Rafa ending with 14 slams, Federer with 17.

In a nutshell - would you rather your player won more GS and was second best(in slam count) to the other or is it all about who has more GS even if it means not winning more? Are you just a fan of the player in general(in which case you'd want him to win AMAP without worrying about where he ranks in the overall count as much)?

 

[nole_no1]

Are you thinking a lot when making this threads?

 

[duarte_a]

Well in 10 years time Nadal won't have any slams if justice is done. Cough Puerto cough.

I wouldn't put my hopes up if I were you though.

 

[OnTheRun]

Well in 10 years time Nadal won't have any slams if justice is done. Cough Puerto cough.

If justice is done, you will be banned of this forum because of doping allegations without proofs But you never know with this moderation team, some other user made a similar message (but not as straight as you) and wasn't banned (and I guess that he wasn't even warned :lol: ).

By the way, Nadal wanted Eufemiano to reveal the names of the sportists that worked with him and was unhappy with the judge decision in the Puerto Operation: http://www.20minutos.es/deportes/noticia/rafa-nadal-operacion-puerto-dopaje-1725291/0/ And, in addition, he wanted to make public his doping test during his 2012 injury episode (9 tests and if I recall correctly 2 of them were blood and orine tests, the other orine tests).

 

[Iblis]

Are you thinking a lot when making this threads?

This is actually a tricky question.
Anyway, I think that Nadal winning 21 slam (or more than Roger for that matter) would actually be the R.I.P. for tennis, so I guess "B".

 

[17-6-302]

Are you thinking a lot when making this threads?

Thank you for your valuable contribution as always.

 

[Apophis]

I'd love for Federer to win another 3 slams. I don't really mind if someone else passes him.

 

[tribalfusion]

Well in 10 years time Nadal won't have any slams if justice is done. Cough Puerto cough.

This is a doping accusation which I believe is punishable around here and you aren't being clever but rather just the usual sort of malcontent we see online who can't accept reality without conspiracy theories.


On topic no one is getting to 20 slams and one of those guys winning a few slams means the other didn't.

Personally, I would rather just see good tennis; this numbers game has spoiled a lot of tennis and made people unappreciative of the great things they should be noticing all the time.

 

[Fargif]

If justice is done, you will be banned of this forum because of doping allegations without proofs But you never know with this moderation team, some other user made a similar message (but not as straight as you) and wasn't banned (and I guess that he wasn't even warned :lol: ).

By the way, Nadal wanted Eufemiano to reveal the names of the sportists that worked with him and was unhappy with the judge decision in the Puerto Operation: http://www.20minutos.es/deportes/noticia/rafa-nadal-operacion-puerto-dopaje-1725291/0/ And, in addition, he wanted to make public his doping test during his 2012 injury episode (9 tests and if I recall correctly 2 of them were blood and orine tests, the other orine tests).

They only bring up what suits them. Ive been warned for far less. But who needs proof noadays. Any moron can say 1 thing and another idiot buys it so it must be true.

 

[BankaiKenpachi]

I chose B for Rafa because Fed is done winning slams anyway. It's much more likely for Rafa to reach 20 than Fed reaching 21, though I would say neither is probable. I wouldn't mind if Rafa retires by 30 as long as he beat Fed in terms of slam counts.