Mens Tennis Forums banner

federer will pass steffi record of 377 wekks??

  • yes

    Votes: 31 42.5%
  • no

    Votes: 42 57.5%
1 - 19 of 19 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,144 Posts
I don't think so. Many new guys in Top 10 who have shown they're capable of beating Federer. Besides, Feds is older and older and he'll be getting exhausted in later phases of big tournaments

But I think he's got a shot at Connors's record of 286 weeks
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
570 Posts
I don't think so. Another 3 years would be an amazing acheivement and the slams count woulds be pretty close to or even surpassing 20.

I can see 250-280 weeks but the young guns are comming.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
9,484 Posts
Not even close
 

·
Mammoths
Joined
·
4,710 Posts
I don't think so. Many new guys in Top 10 who have shown they're capable of beating Federer. Besides, Feds is older and older and he'll be getting exhausted in later phases of big tournaments

But I think he's got a shot at Connors's record of 286 weeks

Yeah, I think 377 weeks is unlikely. I think though that he will continually peak for Slams and be an irritable major force for the rest of the tour for at least the next 4 years even if he loses his number one ranking for extended periods of time and becomes less dominant.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,643 Posts
he'd have to started ruling the ranking aroudn 19 or 20, he started "too late" (I don't think 22 is late, but for acomplishing that, sure is).
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,144 Posts
Right, thanks for that. Czech mistake as we say in Poland, because Connors's number is 268 :haha:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
208 Posts
I'd go for Roger taking about 320 weeks at number one. Right now he's 206. Two more years = 206 + 106 = 312. I think he might lose it sometimes about IW 2010 and Miami 2010 but dunno really. It's just a tough prediction.
 

·
Anathemaniac
Joined
·
41,908 Posts
No way.

He's a relatively late bloomer - won't manage that. It's very unlikely that he'll be able to keep up this level for the coming three years.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
34 Posts
I think its pretty much impossible for the next three years. Especially with Nadal being much younger and other up and comers.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,015 Posts
To be honest, women's tennis is much weaker (depth wise) than men's tennis which is the reason that Graf managed that amazing number in the first place.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
59 Posts
Yes

Allez Roger :)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,816 Posts
I don't think so. The "young guns" (we should really stop calling them that, they've been around long enough now) are catching up fast, some of them have even established themselves as serious contenders at Slams and AMS. I wouldn't be surprised if Federer manages to hang on to the top-spot till the end of 2009, but it is only wishful thinking to expect him to dominate long after that.
 
1 - 19 of 19 Posts
Top