Mens Tennis Forums banner
21 - 40 of 55 Posts
Image


Roger Federer has left the chat.
 
I'd say Gasquet, Gulbis, Medvedev, Paire, and Zverev. These are probably players where you'd rather hit to their forehand than their backhand.

I'd say Murray, Niishikori, and Wawrinka are pretty balanced, but relative to the rest of the tour, three backhands stand out.
 
Nalbandian, Sexy, Drugassi, Benneclown, could definitely argue for Davy or Safin (somebody who watched him more correct me on him). Stan used to be, but the improvements to his FH made him the man.

You could argue for both Fred in latter part of their careers (with the switch to bigger racket 2014-onwards, even before 2017 improvements Fred's BH was the more attacking weapon) and Nadal (2015-18, maybe 20, not sure, then his BH got worse again).

Definitely not Monfils or Thiem.
 
It would have to be a garbage forehand to have a backhand be better than it, even player like Murray or Medvedev run around thei backhands to hit forehands.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mikriman
I think you got it covered, the the two stand-outs are Murray and djok.
And it's interesting to me these are both guys are stronger returners than servers
Big server/FH usually goes together.
Also, women are the opposite of men; most have better Bhs.
 
Nikoloz Basilashvili for sure
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ganz4a4
this is from Nov. 18 Who Has the Best Shots in Men’s Tennis? (Published 2018)

they voted
double handed backhand
Djokovic
Nishikori
Zverev

single handed backhand
Wawrinka
Gasquet
Federer
But all those players except Gasquet would rather hit a forehand. Even Gasquet sometimes runs around to hit a forehand (though he sometimes also does the reverse). The only player who consistently runs around forehands to hit backhands is Paire. I think Musetti is the only other player who MIGHT genuinely rather hit a backhand.
 
Djokovic and Wawrinka aren't even close, both have one of the most underrated FHs in tennis :ROFLMAO:

when we talk about players' backhands being better than their forehands, it's in a relative sense. there are an exceedingly small number of players whose backhands are better than their forehands on an absolute scale. most players with great backhands would still rather try to hit a winner with their forehand if given a choice, because their forehand will be the more powerful shot still.
Yeah that's true but about the 2nd part...

As you said, almost all players are runnig around their BH at some point because the FH is more powerful (= eaiser to finish the point) and you can also handle extremely high or low balls better but that doesn't mean that their FH is actually the better shot overall, just better in certain circumstances. Players like Paire and Gulbis are spraying FH on a regular basis, and it's not because they take so much more risk on the FH and hit siginificantly more FH winners.
 
Djokovic and Wawrinka aren't even close, both have one of the most underrated FHs in tennis :ROFLMAO:



Yeah that's true but about the 2nd part...

As you said, almost all players are runnig around their BH at some point because the FH is more powerful (= eaiser to finish the point) and you can also handle extremely high or low balls better but that doesn't mean that their FH is actually the better shot overall, just better in certain circumstances. Players like Paire and Gulbis are spraying FH on a regular basis, and it's not because they take so much more risk on the FH and hit siginificantly more FH winners.
Yes, I think it's more that certain shots like you mention are a lot easier with the forehand rather the fh being always better. Murray, Djokovic, and many other very fast moving players will only run around to hit the forehand in these very specific situations, where you have someone like Berretini who is alway trying to run around and hit a forehand even though he's not the fastest guy on tour.
 
21 - 40 of 55 Posts