Mens Tennis Forums banner

1 - 20 of 48 Posts

·
Your visions will happen
Joined
·
48,564 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
As we all know, from TMC 2003 to Dubai 2007, Fed went 264-15.

However, he had many more close calls during that span, and could have lost a few more matches.

TMC 2003 RR Federer def. Agassi 6-7, 6-3, 7-6. Close match, this, could have easily gone either way. This was the match that really took Federer to the next level with his confidence.

Agassi Indian Wells 2004. Agassi was good vs. early peak Roger, Fed had to battle to take this one 6-4 in the 3rd.

Davydenko Miami 2004. Fed won this 7-5 in the third, I think Roger was tired after that Indian Wells event.

Gaudio Hamburg 2004. Gaston had a chance in this, losing 4-6 in the 3rd. Not sure if the Argie had a break in the 3rd.

Roddick Wimbledon 2004. Andy had him on the ropes here before the rain delay, but Roger ended up winning this.

Karlovic Gstaad 2004. 7-6 in the third, Ivo was serving bombs. Fed also went 6-4 in the third w/ Sexy Stepanek in the QF, and 6-3 in the third with Starace in the SF.

Agassi USO 2004. Incredible match, great quality, Fed won it 6-3 in the 5th.

Paradorn in Bangkok 2004. Good atmosphere, but Roger won 6-3 in the third.

Moya TMC 2004. Fed won it 6-3 in the third, Carlos was the only one to take a set from him at the Masters that year.

Ljubicic Rotterdam 2005. Fed played pretty bad, Ljubo had 4-2 in the 3rd set tiebreaker before losing it.

Ivo Minar and JCF in Dubai 2005. Fed had to go to a 3rd set tiebreak w/ both of these guys. Ferrero had a break in the third and had 2 match points in the TB, but Roger was too good.

Zabaleta and Ancic in Miami 2005. Zabaleta too him to 6-3 in the third and Ancic took him to 6-4 in the 3rd.

Nadal Miami 2005. Nadal really messed this one up. 2 sets and a break I think, also had 5-3 in the 3rd set TB before Fed came all the way back to win in 5.

Gonzalez Monte Carlo 2005. Fed won it 6-4 in the third, Fena was really blasting it in this one.

Soderling in Halle 2005, Soderling really had a chance here, and Safin had a chance in the final, 6-4 in the third.

Kiefer and Ginepri in Cincy 2005. Fed had to scrape through this one, 6-4 in the third on both, played like shit.

Nalbandian and Ljubo in TMC 2005 RR. Had to go 6-4 and 7-6 in the third here.

Haas in AO 2006 and Davydenko too. Both guys had an excellent chance to knock off a well sub-par Fed here.

O. Rochus Indian Wells 2006. Fed had to go 7-5 in the third here.

Djokovic Monte Carlo 2006. Young Nole pushing Fed to 6-3 in the third.

Almugro and Nalby in Rome 2006, taking Fed to 7-5 and 7-6 in the third.

Nalby in RG 2006, had a set and a break before getting injured.

Richie and Rochus in Halle 2006, both had him on the ropes.

Malisse, Gonzo, Gasquet in Canada 2006, all had chances.

Suzuki in Tokyo 2006. Fed was shitting his pants here, 7-6 in the 3rd.

Srichaphan in Basel 2006. 7-6 in the third, Paradorn was playing really well.

Roddick at TMC 2006. Rod fucked this one up, a few match points.

Pless and Djokovic in Dubai 2007. Both took him to 6-3 in the third.

As you can see, Fed even at his best had plenty of close calls.
 

·
.
Joined
·
29,637 Posts
Almagro and Nalbandian in Rome were brilliant matches.

That Rome tournament was fantastic, capped off by the Fedal final.
 

·
Anathemaniac
Joined
·
41,908 Posts
Almagro and Nalbandian in Rome were brilliant matches.

That Rome tournament was fantastic, capped off by the Fedal final.
Tournament AND final of the decade imho. :worship:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,523 Posts
Albert Einstein like Conclusion: Fed overachieved, really BIG.
He also had pretty close losses... Safin AO 2005, Nadal Rome 2006, RG final 2007 he was 1/17 on BPs, Nalby 2005 TMC 6-7 in the 5th on one leg...
 

·
Lurrrkin'
Joined
·
18,058 Posts
Well you're not going to go on runs like that without some close calls and matches going the distance. He might have been called Jesus Fed or Godmode Fed or whatever but he obviously isn't Jesus or God. He actually exists.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,516 Posts
What a mental midget this Federer, winning so many close matches when not playing his best (or when the opponent was playing very well)

:rolleyes:

Kudos for the work :yeah:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,430 Posts
As we all know, from TMC 2003 to Dubai 2007, Fed went 264-15.

However, he had many more close calls during that span, and could have lost a few more matches.

TMC 2003 RR Federer def. Agassi 6-7, 6-3, 7-6. Close match, this, could have easily gone either way. This was the match that really took Federer to the next level with his confidence.

Agassi Indian Wells 2004. Agassi was good vs. early peak Roger, Fed had to battle to take this one 6-4 in the 3rd.

Davydenko Miami 2004. Fed won this 7-5 in the third, I think Roger was tired after that Indian Wells event.

Gaudio Hamburg 2004. Gaston had a chance in this, losing 4-6 in the 3rd. Not sure if the Argie had a break in the 3rd.

Roddick Wimbledon 2004. Andy had him on the ropes here before the rain delay, but Roger ended up winning this.

Karlovic Gstaad 2004. 7-6 in the third, Ivo was serving bombs. Fed also went 6-4 in the third w/ Sexy Stepanek in the QF, and 6-3 in the third with Starace in the SF.

Agassi USO 2004. Incredible match, great quality, Fed won it 6-3 in the 5th.

Paradorn in Bangkok 2004. Good atmosphere, but Roger won 6-3 in the third.

Moya TMC 2004. Fed won it 6-3 in the third, Carlos was the only one to take a set from him at the Masters that year.

Ljubicic Rotterdam 2005. Fed played pretty bad, Ljubo had 4-2 in the 3rd set tiebreaker before losing it.

Ivo Minar and JCF in Dubai 2005. Fed had to go to a 3rd set tiebreak w/ both of these guys. Ferrero had a break in the third and had 2 match points in the TB, but Roger was too good.

Zabaleta and Ancic in Miami 2005. Zabaleta too him to 6-3 in the third and Ancic took him to 6-4 in the 3rd.

Nadal Miami 2005. Nadal really messed this one up. 2 sets and a break I think, also had 5-3 in the 3rd set TB before Fed came all the way back to win in 5.

Gonzalez Monte Carlo 2005. Fed won it 6-4 in the third, Fena was really blasting it in this one.

Soderling in Halle 2005, Soderling really had a chance here, and Safin had a chance in the final, 6-4 in the third.

Kiefer and Ginepri in Cincy 2005. Fed had to scrape through this one, 6-4 in the third on both, played like shit.

Nalbandian and Ljubo in TMC 2005 RR. Had to go 6-4 and 7-6 in the third here.

Haas in AO 2006 and Davydenko too. Both guys had an excellent chance to knock off a well sub-par Fed here.

O. Rochus Indian Wells 2006. Fed had to go 7-5 in the third here.

Djokovic Monte Carlo 2006. Young Nole pushing Fed to 6-3 in the third.

Almugro and Nalby in Rome 2006, taking Fed to 7-5 and 7-6 in the third.

Nalby in RG 2006, had a set and a break before getting injured.

Richie and Rochus in Halle 2006, both had him on the ropes.

Malisse, Gonzo, Gasquet in Canada 2006, all had chances.

Suzuki in Tokyo 2006. Fed was shitting his pants here, 7-6 in the 3rd.

Srichaphan in Basel 2006. 7-6 in the third, Paradorn was playing really well.

Roddick at TMC 2006. Rod fucked this one up, a few match points.

Pless and Djokovic in Dubai 2007. Both took him to 6-3 in the third.

As you can see, Fed even at his best had plenty of close calls.
it`s obvius, the opponents played too.

federer was great in that time, but the rivals played too, he is greate but not perfect jajaj.

another demostration that the circuit were more hard than now, the agassi of 2004 and 2005 for me in fast courts was more dangerous than murray in a slam
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
3,513 Posts
very smart subtle attack on Fed :yeah: Why don't you go into the close matches he lost, especially in 2005 when 2/4 losses were in some of the greatest matches of all time and 1/4 was in a final set tiebreak 10-8. Obviously he's won some close ones, the real story is how close he came in 2005 to losing one match all year and how high quality the opposition was (peak Fed vs. peak Safin vs. peak Nalbandian was scary) :wavey:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,069 Posts
I remember the Agassi RR match very well and I agree with you... too bad we can't seem to find this one on the internet.

The last two sets of their US Open QF were played in very windy conditions, but the first three had been very good quality indeed -- as it would also be the case in their US Open final the next year.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
12,633 Posts
I remember the Agassi RR match very well and I agree with you... too bad we can't seem to find this one on the internet.

The last two sets of their US Open QF were played in very windy conditions, but the first three had been very good quality indeed -- as it would also be the case in their US Open final the next year.
Actually you can - try rogerfedererpoints - in the matches section. If you have a problem, pm me, I know other sources
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shirogane

·
Registered
Joined
·
580 Posts
Well you're not going to go on runs like that without some close calls and matches going the distance. He might have been called Jesus Fed or Godmode Fed or whatever but he obviously isn't Jesus or God. He actually exists.
Sick burn.:D Anyway your post reminds me of some youtube comments about 'Jesus Fed' which go along the lines of "I wish people would stop comparing Federer with Jesus, he's good but he's not Federer".:D
 

·
Your visions will happen
Joined
·
48,564 Posts
Discussion Starter #18
Almagro and Nalbandian in Rome were brilliant matches.

That Rome tournament was fantastic, capped off by the Fedal final.
Great event.

So? Pointless thread, c'mon, you can do better than this...
I'm just pointing out that even Federer at his best had to fight to get a lot of his wins, even against so called "mugs".

He also had pretty close losses... Safin AO 2005, Nadal Rome 2006, RG final 2007 he was 1/17 on BPs, Nalby 2005 TMC 6-7 in the 5th on one leg...
Yes, plenty of close losses at his peak as well.

Hrbaty in Cincy 04, Berdych in Olympics 04, Safin in AO 05, Gasquet in Monte Carlo 05, TMC 05 final vs. King Dave, Nadal in Dubai 06, Nadal in MC and Rome 06, even the French in 06 Fed had a shot.

it`s obvius, the opponents played too.

federer was great in that time, but the rivals played too, he is greate but not perfect jajaj.

another demostration that the circuit were more hard than now, the agassi of 2004 and 2005 for me in fast courts was more dangerous than murray in a slam
Oh yeah Oldassi would own Murray these days.

very smart subtle attack on Fed :yeah: Why don't you go into the close matches he lost, especially in 2005 when 2/4 losses were in some of the greatest matches of all time and 1/4 was in a final set tiebreak 10-8. Obviously he's won some close ones, the real story is how close he came in 2005 to losing one match all year and how high quality the opposition was (peak Fed vs. peak Safin vs. peak Nalbandian was scary) :wavey:
Yep, had a few close losses too.

I remember the Agassi RR match very well and I agree with you... too bad we can't seem to find this one on the internet.

The last two sets of their US Open QF were played in very windy conditions, but the first three had been very good quality indeed -- as it would also be the case in their US Open final the next year.
Yeah Agassi gave Fed a few great battles early in Fed's peak.

great thread johnny:yeah:
:yeah:

I didn't realise every 3 set match is considered a close call. :rolleyes:
Not every match, just a good number of them.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
528 Posts
If Federer's wins are close, it means the opposition has poor mental strength. Also Federer has poor mental, b/c he should beat the mugs by a much wider margin.
If Federer wins by a huge margin, it means his competition have no talent and are mentally weak..
If Federer loses by a close margin, it means that Federer has poor mental strength and his ability is less than that of his opponent (who should win more often).
If Federer loses by a large margin it means that Federer is both mentally weak and its proof positive that he has no ability!

Therefore, under no circumstance can we ever conclude that Federer has any tennis ability or mental strength whatsoever! QED
 
1 - 20 of 48 Posts
Top