How about you try to form your own argument, instead of the ad-hominem nature of your post?
I think that Roger Federer would be the best out of them all had this era not been so homogenised and slow, but he will not go down as such because he will be well behind in pretty much all records. The truth is that he blew it in many matches that he could have won during his actual prime and even more when he was removed from his prime - he is quite clearly the mentally weakest player out of himself, Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic.
In the end, he could be as far behind as Pete Sampras is to him and many Roger Federer fanboys dismiss Pete Sampras as if he was some glorified club player. One can't have it both ways.