That surely implies you have an open mind. Commitment is hard because of the sacrifices required. I totally get the atheist point of view as well, life just seems more "inconvenient" when you have God in the picture. We all don't like being told what to do. The irony is that from the Christian perspective, this inconvenience we perceive is exactly part of the problem - we are unable to truly relate to God on our own, and when all we do what we want to do, sometimes the consequences aren't so great.
The alternative that the universe is completely naturalistic is far more difficult for me to accept. Are we simply the same as the animals, the breath no greater than they? Did we cry or mourn death in vain? Was injustice really just our imagination of what a proper world should be like, when the world is just dog eat dog, and death imparts to all with finality - i.e. then suicide is actually not a bad end for the person, only to others? And was our seeming intelligence, the ability to solve some of the most "useless" but dastardly difficult problems as Fermat's Last Theorem (number theory Diophantine problem that was posited in the 17th century but took over 350 years to solve, credited to Andrew Wiles) just a product of random gene mutations that produced superior intelligence, without imparting any additional benefit (I mean Wiles solved it and got huge acclaim, but it didn't exactly change the world nor even was considered of high priority on a mathematician's to-do list, rather it was a party game by comparison, albeit of a troll source. Entirely useless in and of itself, apart from the algebra required to prove it)? I must insult myself to suggest that an unordered unintelligent universe put together the thoughts that appear from my head, with which I have no way to ascertain its internal logic! Do we just take the word from our brain, which operates and was produced under such unintelligent and chaotic principles?
Evolution by natural selection somehow managed this for our survival?
Anyhow just wanted to explain some perspectives on a rational basis for belief.
The other perspective is an irrational one - and one I cannot explain, except for that
it is. Now I sit down at the church pews and they start preaching on the love of God through Christ, his selflessness, and the desperation of the human situation and their need for a Saviour. I get fed truth bombs and get broken up inside. There's an unconscious divine call that tells me it is right, even when I am inclined to turn away from that. My heart's not always there in the right place but the man on the cross and his story, whenever it is emphasised, makes me shake from the walls of my body, and I cannot fight that, to the point of tearing up. Acts 2:36 calls this "cut to the heart", and that's the feeling I get in oneness with God. It's beautiful and awe-inspiring, and leaves me defenseless and broken to my own desires.
View attachment 354868
The Bible tell the stubborn Israelites in the book of Joel to "rend your heart, not your garments" (Joel 2:13) and in Ezekiel to have their hearts of stone replaced with hearts of flesh. Joel and Ezekiel both then predicts this heart rending experience.
"I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit in you; I will remove from you your heart of stone and give you a heart of flesh." Ezekiel 36:26
But at the same time, we know that we find it very hard to change our attitudes and propensity towards evil, as the leopard doesn't change its spots nor can a black man the colour of his skin (Jeremiah 13:23). Even greater a problem, is that we cannot do moral heart surgeries on ourselves. Religious cleansing rituals do not clean our moral consciences marred from the inside. No amount of washing our hands, or bowing your head on a mat, even kissing the pope's ring will change that part of us, but we are so inclined to buy it. These are but covers for a defective heart.
The prospect of a new heart is a fantastic one, but I always feel the internal struggle to choose rightly and embrace the new heart and let it rule my life. This to me is the basis of the Christian faith more than anything else. The struggle is real but has been won. I can feel that within. As much as I am a man of logic, the personal heart rending experience is one that transcends our scale of logic, but it is a crucial one to a person's faith. The default position of any man is to proclaim his own intelligence and perspectives superior. No man will comfortably turn his head to face God unless he is humble enough to recognise a heart issue within. And when such a person realises that God still loves them despite this horrible truth, the heart is rended, reshaped and reinvigorated, quite a cathartic experience. There are many out there who struggle with the truth about God. They have so many questions but see no answers, steeped too heavily in "logic" to see beauty, love and tragedy. Being intelligent can often be a huge blindspot. Of all things, it wasn't science or logic that brought me to God, but rather "rend your heart", and I'm more the glad for that. Of course, I still had to investigate the claims further but without the heart-rending, there would not be any magnetic draw towards faith.