[U][B]Rankings Explained:[/B][/U]
• Your ranking consists of 23 tournaments. The 4 Grand Slams + 9 Masters 1000s + 10 of your other best results
(from the 250s and 500s). If you qualify for the WTF at the end of the year that adds as your 24th tournament.
• Since the Grand Slams and 1000 tournaments are mandatory, missing any of them results in a score of "0"
• Only your best result of the week is counted each week towards your ranking
• The Race differs from the Rankings because Rankings only count 24 tournaments, whereas the Race includes your results
from every week of the calendar year.
I can go through backwards through the list ^^ from RG and make amendments if that will help too. I think I started helping BMT on RG anyways, so I have that spreadsheet on my desktop. If anyone else starts from Memphis working forward, we will no doubt meet somewhere along the line
Thanks for the list Synesthetic. :wavey:
I can go through backwards through the list ^^ from RG and make amendments if that will help too. I think I started helping BMT on RG anyways, so I have that spreadsheet on my desktop. If anyone else starts from Memphis working forward, we will no doubt meet somewhere along the line
Thanks for the list Synesthetic. :wavey:
I'll post the correct scores for the 2014 tournaments today (I just did Memphis).
Thanks a lot for the help JJ! Just saw your posts in the tournament threads. You can leave Brisbane to me if you want, I have the spreadsheet for it ready and I'll post it a bit later. With Doha, I think everyone except 2 players have 20 points too many, it's possibly related to the Youzhny-Basilashvili match. If bryan's around maybe he can double check this
I just remembered that there was an issue with Dubai 2015 (Rekanto appears twice), so I added it to the list
I think some of the errors are still there in those. I'll briefly explain each one:
Auckland: Freak3yman84 should be 24th instead of 4th. It looks like he picked Robredo to win the tournament BEFORE the draw changed with Ferrer's withdrawal, which means that his Robredo pick should have been replaced with Lu, not Pouille. This means that he should have 9 points less than in those standings (since Pouille made the SFs). Additionally, I believe digor is missing 8 points for some reason and should be tied for 25th, and powellewan is missing 5 points.
Dubai: I should have explained this more clearly before. Rekanto submitted 2 draws, the first one with Federer as the winner and the second with Djokovic to win. The second draw should have replaced the first, but both draws were included in the spreadsheet and due to a bug both were displayed as the Federer draw. If the Djokovic draw counts, he should be =37th instead of 4th. This is a significant amount of points since Dubai is an ATP500. Also, dashedcartoon and ProdigyEng have 9 points too many due to an oversight with the qualifiers in one section of the draw (they picked [Q]Ward to make the QFs, but all "Qualifiers" in everyone's QF picks were replaced with [Q]Ilhan who did make the QFs from that section).
Doha: In my spreadsheet, all players except torakichi5025 and GrishaFTW have 4 points less than in the posted final standings. They were the only 2 players to pick [Q]Basilashvili to beat Youzhny in R1. I'm not sure how to explain this discrepancy though.
Please don't feel like you have to do them again though, these are for the most part fairly minor errors and I never intended to make anyone else go to the trouble of doing this. I'll eventually get around to posting the correct scores, but you guys should feel free to go ahead with the rankings work without finishing these corrections since most of them will probably only mean a few points difference here and there
Don't worry about final standings of 2014 tournaments I know Manuel aready calculate those and the points in the rankings are correct . I'm going make the 2014 final update tonight or tomorrow.
Yes Fargif, the decision was made to use the 2014 system and finalise the new system for 2016.
@Synesthetic, oops sorry, I forgot to check back in here... I didn't realise those mistakes and was just going off the final standings that had already been posted. Sorry :wavey: I did not expect to check the actual picks of each player and so I didn't create a new spreadsheet for each to double check. I will see if I can do this for you guys later in the week, starting with the earlier ones so they are ready to go for bry. :banana:
EDIT: Doha is correct, I found that Basilashvili discrepancy and noted it in the final standing I posted if I remember correctly, it only moved 3 players in the lower standings. The discrepancy was probably due to not putting the winner in for that particular Rd1 match, everyone who picked Youzhny ended up with 4 points less.
I will do Auckland and Dubai ASAP.
EDIT2: Actually, that might have been in RG.... hmmmm... I will double check Doha too! :lol:
Yes Fargif, the decision was made to use the 2014 system and finalise the new system for 2016.
@Synesthetic, oops sorry, I forgot to check back in here... I didn't realise those mistakes and was just going off the final standings that had already been posted. Sorry :wavey: I did not expect to check the actual picks of each player and so I didn't create a new spreadsheet for each to double check. I will see if I can do this for you guys later in the week, starting with the earlier ones so they are ready to go for bry. :banana:
EDIT: Doha is correct, I found that Basilashvili discrepancy and noted it in the final standing I posted if I remember correctly, it only moved 3 players in the lower standings. The discrepancy was probably due to not putting the winner in for that particular Rd1 match, everyone who picked Youzhny ended up with 4 points less.
I will do Auckland and Dubai ASAP.
EDIT2: Actually, that might have been in RG.... hmmmm... I will double check Doha too! :lol:
Why change back to a system that was outdated? And to make a new one next year while we were already halft way tru this season? I fail to understand why a new system never got a chance.
You answered your own question. The discussions about the new system dragged too much without everyone getting to a final version. Getting back to the old system and actually having rankings was the sensitive thing to do in this situation. The discussions for the new system can continue so that we will have something ready for next year.
Welcome to the 2020 FITD Manager's Thread
Your help is needed to keep this game alive! It's fun, easy, and you get to see your score before everyone else!
Useful Links:
2020 FITD Rankings
FITD Manager's Guide for
Cristian's FITD Spreadsheet
FITD Manager's Guide for
eye's FITD Speadsheet...
Rankings Explained:
• Your ranking consists of 23 tournaments. The 4 Grand Slams + 9 Masters 1000s + 10 of your other best results
(from the 250s and 500s). If you qualify for the WTF at the end of the year that adds as your 24th tournament.
• Since the Grand Slams and 1000 tournaments are...
FITD Management for Starters
The Management in a FITD Tournament can be a difficult task, so here there are the steps I follow as a manager.
The attached files are Excel Files (.xlsx), I use them on a Microsoft Windows computer.
32 players draw (new file)...
Welcome to the 2019 FITD Manager's Thread
YOUR help is needed to keep this game alive. It's easy, fun, and you get to see your score before everyone else.
Useful Links:
2019 FITD Rankings
FITD Manager's Guide
Classic FITD Spreadsheet
Cristian's FITD Spreadsheet
eye's FITD Spreadsheet...
A forum community dedicated to male tennis players and enthusiasts. Talk about everything from the ATP, NSMTA, to college Tennis and even everything about equipment. It's all here!
If anyone else starts from Memphis working forward, we will no doubt meet somewhere along the line 
