[Havok]

can you all Andy a top 10 player after that epic match

 

[Scotso]

No.

It only lasted that long because they both have huge serves.

 

[Chloe le Bopper]

Well unless you are in denial, yes you call him a top ten player.

Otherwise would require about a 3 month denial, which is rather unhealthy.

 

[Hurley]

LOL at Scott, the least objective person in the history of Earth.

 

[James]

Yes, but I did before this match anyways because he would have been what, No.6 (?) even if he had lost.

What will his ranking be now?

 

[Hurley]

Still 6. Advancing to the final will push him to 4, but that's a loooong match away.

 

[Nacho]

yes, he's a top 10. He is not the best, but is consistent enough to keep that ranking

 

[Scotso]

Consistent enough in beating players ranked far below him. He's yet to show real talent.

I don't need to be objective, Hurley. You like him, so you're biased as well. You want his ass though, so perhaps you're more-so.

He is a top ten player, but he hasn't proved that he should be. He's still all hype and little talent. The way he progressed into the semifinals doesn't prove anything to the contrary.

 

[Havok]

so can u say the samething about Daniela Hantuchova because she's the same story.she's pretty much beaten nobody in the top ten except for maybe 3 i think, and only won 1 tournament??? it's not Andy's fault if the players he's suppose to play allbow out before he gets a chance

 

[J. Corwin]

Well he did beat the player that took down Lleyton Hewitt...

 

[Chloe le Bopper]

it's not Andy's fault if the players he's suppose to play allbow out before he gets a chance

*ahem*

Do you want me to count the number of times that Andy lost before he could play a top player as well?

No need to let on like the whole tour is losing before they have a shot at Andy.

 

[heya]

If you're indifferent toward Andy, then why aren't you spending
more time chatting about your favorite player? Is it because, just
like the media, you can't stop thinking about him?

Why repeat that he's no good over and over like a nervous tick, hoping that he's not #1 material?

Why not boast about Ferrero, Hewitt, Safin, Federer, and
now, El Aynaoui instead? I'm sure they've never been beaten
by anyone below #50. It's ok to want Agassi as a substitute for your favorite
player who didn't qualify for the semifinals. That's the only chance
to keep Andy from succeeding and calm your seething anger.

 

[Chloe le Bopper]

heya, before I rip your post to threads, piece by piece - who were you adressing that to?

 

[Gonzo Hates Me!]

*ahem*

Do you want me to count the number of times that Andy lost before he could play a top player as well?

No need to let on like the whole tour is losing before they have a shot at Andy.

He/she wasn't. The post was addressed to those who say that Andy doesn't beat top players, which means he apparently sucks and isn't a top 10-calibur player... even though, he kinda, is!?

Anyway, so the point is, people always say he only advanced 'cause he's playing lower ranked players, but the higher ranked players keep getting upset. There is nothing Andy can do about that. If the higher ranked players like Lleyton, Ferrero, and Federer can't win over a lower ranked player, then Andy will never play these guys!! And if Andy can beat the lower ranks and the others can't, I guess the others are really more pathetic. And that's kinda funny, hehe

 

[babydoll]

I agree with heya & Mrs. Guga.

To answer the poll question. Heck yeah.

Go Andy!!!! :bounce:

 

[Lindsayfan]

andy was a top ten also before this match,he's a great player and he'll rule tennis world next years along with Safin,Federer,Ferrero and uhm Hewitt.

 

[Hurley]

 

[maratski]

I'm still not becoming a fan of Andy, but have to give him credit for the win. Younes may not be a top 10 player, but it was a good win. I still don't think he can compete with the big boys.
Andy reminds me of Hewitt in a way, cause Hewitt has more titles than the other new balls, but his 1st titles came in small tournaments and so do Andy's wins.
Just glad to see the drama queen not faking any cramping. That's a step in the right direction for him. Oh yeah those linecalls were dubious sometimes.

 

[Hurley]

LOL

 

[Vera]

Congrats to Andy. But what about Younes. He beat the number 1 player in the world and now he pushed the #6 player in the world to the limit. I'm more impressed with him. At 31, he's still playing incredible tennis after 5 hours. And he's ever so gracious even after losing the match.

And at 19-18, he got rubbed a match point for a bad line call and he barely argued (maybe too tired to). So now, I hope I'll never hear ppl complaining about Andy didn't win USO 01 because he got rubbed by a bad line call when he played against Hewitt. I mean, apparently everyone has a fair share of bad call.