Mens Tennis Forums banner

1 - 20 of 39 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
25,459 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Well, duh. :lol:

Slow news day. ;) This is a simple opinion piece I came across recently and even though it preaches to the choir and doesn't really offer any earth-shattering revelations, I thought I'd share it here anyway and get your opinion of Ms. Robertson's opinion. Notice that I included her e-mail here so that the rabid WTA fans can send her the Anna Kournikova virus.

IN MY OPINION
Men offer depth, skills and upsets


by LINDA ROBERTSON
[email protected]

I will take Roger Federer's strokes over Kim Clijsters' splits any day.

I prefer Andy Roddick's serve to Elena Dementieva's imitation of a serve.

I would rather watch Marat Safin's forehand than Justine Henin-Hardenne's backhand.

Give me Andre Agassi vs. James Blake and take Mary Pierce vs. Amelie Mauresmo -- please.

And, yes, Rafael Nadal's Capri pants look better than Serena Williams' go-go boots.

Men's tennis beats women's tennis, in terms of quality and personality.

I would not have said that a few years ago, when too many men's matches were like Robocop vs. the Terminator -- wham, bam, scram. All power, no panache. Blame it on the rackets. But the leaders of tennis, who have flailed around in their efforts to revive the sport's popularity, did one thing right: They slowed down the courts to lengthen the rallies. Even Wimbledon has tinkered with its hallowed grass.

Men's tennis is entertaining again. The groundstrokes are awesome. The quickness of players such as Nadal, Guillermo Coria or Lleyton Hewitt takes your breath away. Federer has brought back the art of shot-making.

Listen to the mesmerizing thwack-thwack of a men's match and contrast it to the sounds of women's tennis -- bleating and choking.

The men's game is filled with upsets and thrillers and the emergence of a Robby Ginepri or a Gaston Gaudio because there is more depth. The early rounds for women feature dreadful 40-minute two-setters. Or even the late rounds. Henin-Hardenne disposed of Pierce in this year's French Open final without getting her shoes dirty. Last year's Roland Garros final between Anastasia Myskina and Dementieva was unworthy of a Grand Slam. You, dear reader, could have beaten either player. Heck, even David could have won.

At least when Safin self-destructs it's fun to watch.

Would you rather hear Agassi speak eloquently about the devastation wrought by Hurricane Katrina or Venus Williams speak vacantly about how she's unaware of current events?

Federer is a cut above, but it's interesting to watch history being made; he's already drawing comparsions to Rod Laver. On the women's side, it's a parade of undeserving No. 1s such as Lindsay Davenport, Clijsters and Mauresmo.

The women are either physically hurt or mentally frail. The guys don't fuss about the crushing pressure of the pro tour. They accept it as part of sports.

The best thing about women's tennis was the Williams sisters. But Venus and Serena have gone from refreshing to annoying. They are now as shallow and materialistic as most athletes. Venus came up with a lame excuse for losing earlier this week. She said she blew her quarterfinal to Clijsters because Clijsters started playing poorly, causing her to play poorly, too. Uh, earth to Venus: Usually when your opponent stinks, you capitalize rather than capitulate.

Maria Sharapova has great potential -- if she doesn't become another burned-out-by-the-domineering-dad cliché. But it's the other dream teen -- Nadal -- who puts on a better show.

Right now it's raining men and the men reign.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
14,727 Posts
:rolleyes:

she needs to get laid
 

·
F***ing have it
Joined
·
17,584 Posts

·
Banned
Joined
·
14,727 Posts
alfonsojose said:
with Navratilova :tape:
:banghead: that image will NEVER get out of my head now!!!

I'll never have sex again!!!!! :banghead: :armed:




:angel:
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
14,727 Posts
R.Federer said:
Here I disagree
I actually agree with her on that one. I know that most people think that J2H's backhand is the best in the game, and the most beautiful. I think she leans back too much, and I know that this is why its such a powerful stroke, but I just don't think its that aesthetically appealing.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
25,459 Posts
Discussion Starter #7
I will take Roger Federer's strokes over Kim Clijsters' splits any day.
I kinda like showboat moves and Kim's splits are :cool:

I prefer Andy Roddick's serve to Elena Dementieva's imitation of a serve.
Definitely

I would rather watch Marat Safin's forehand than Justine Henin-Hardenne's backhand.
Disagree. :hearts: JHH's backhand. I do like like two-handed jump backhand Marat does though.

Give me Andre Agassi vs. James Blake and take Mary Pierce vs. Amelie Mauresmo -- please.
The Andre-James match had everything in it and no other match either on the men's or women's side can compare. The Sharapova-Petrova had a lot of tension and drama though.

At least when Safin self-destructs it's fun to watch.
Or Massu at last year's US Open. :lol:

Would you rather hear Agassi speak eloquently about the devastation wrought by Hurricane Katrina or Venus Williams speak vacantly about how she's unaware of current events?
Venus and Serena "What? Me worry?" Williams :smash:

Federer is a cut above, but it's interesting to watch history being made; he's already drawing comparsions to Rod Laver. On the women's side, it's a parade of undeserving No. 1s such as Lindsay Davenport, Clijsters and Mauresmo.
The only one undeserving of No. 1 is/was Mauresmo. The other girls have at least a slam and a slew of other titles to their name.

The women are either physically hurt
Hello Poo and Taylor :wavey:

or mentally frail.
The Dark and Dangerous Mysteries of the Fragile Russian Psyche by Boris Yelsin

The guys don't fuss about the crushing pressure of the pro tour. They accept it as part of sports.
Er, many the guys have been complaining about the grueling schedule for a while now, including Safin, Henman, Roddick, and others.

The best thing about women's tennis was the Williams sisters.
For some people, I guess it was. But in those early years when they dominated everything I pretty much tuned women's tennis out completely and focused more on the men.

Despite her lukewarm arguments, I still agree that men's tennis is better than women's, but with no one really dominating the women's game right now, it's also gotten a lot more interesting. :)

To that end, when Title IX was first signed into law and women had to fight to get equal money/time/space/attention in high school sports, I don't think they envisioned this for the future in professional sports:

"It's been really disappointing. Billie Jean King came up to the booth the other day and I don't want to say she was embarrassed because -- I don't want to put words in her mouth -- but this is not what she envisioned I think. Obviously, she has no control of it and, in some cases, it could just be bad luck; it just doesn't seem like it picked up any steam. In the men's, it seems like a lot of close matches and good story lines. I do cover both men's and women's, although I do have a bias towards men's tennis because I played on the men's tour for 15 years, but really there's much more excitement. Hopefully the quarterfinals on that we'll see some great tennis." -- John McEnroe on the uneven blowouts through the first four rounds on the women's side at the 20
 

·
F***ing have it
Joined
·
17,584 Posts
Lindsay's forehand :bowdown:
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
14,727 Posts
alfonsojose said:
Lindsay's forehand :bowdown:
:worship: and backhand.... slightly more reliable, dontchathink?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lee

·
F***ing have it
Joined
·
17,584 Posts
Blowe said:
:worship: and backhand.... slightly more reliable, dontchathink?
agree, but her crosscourt forehand is maybe the cleanest forehand out there (next to Capriati's)
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
14,727 Posts
alfonsojose said:
agree, but her crosscourt forehand is maybe the cleanest forehand out there (next to Capriati's)
:worship: and that Davenport forehand return deep down the middle :eek: i think thats the best women's return in tennis. Capriati has always been my favorite women's player, but it seems like the last few years she's preferred to try and smack her way through a player and hope for an error instead of going for winners. She's either lost a lot of confidence or the women's game has just evolved past her.

:worship: Jennn!!!!!! Come back and win number 4!!!!!
 

·
F***ing have it
Joined
·
17,584 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,247 Posts
this type of article only makes me like women's tennis even more :lol::p
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
28,276 Posts
This is a poor piece because she takes awful examples of things from the wta and compares them to excellent examples of the same thing on the ATP (Dementieva and Roddick serving, for example).

It would be nice if people who knew what they were talking about would write about tennis.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
439 Posts
tangerine_dream said:
Well, duh. :lol:

Slow news day. ;) This is a simple opinion piece I came across recently and even though it preaches to the choir and doesn't really offer any earth-shattering revelations, I thought I'd share it here anyway and get your opinion of Ms. Robertson's opinion. Notice that I included her e-mail here so that the rabid WTA fans can send her the Anna Kournikova virus.

IN MY OPINION
Men offer depth, skills and upsets

by LINDA ROBERTSON
[email protected]
I will take Roger Federer's strokes over Kim Clijsters' splits any day.
federer's strokes are one in a million. try comparing stroke for stroke, split for split. which male player splits? fereira?last i heard he ended up with a bad groin injury.

I prefer Andy Roddick's serve to Elena Dementieva's imitation of a serve.
one of the best male serves against one of the worst women's serves. try comparing A-Rod's serve to Serena's in their respective fields. if u wanna compare Dementieva's serve to a male, try volandri or nalbandian or even coria. at least her serve is unpredictable. she can actuall hit 2nd serve aces. the fact that it is unpredictable makes it exciting to watch.

I would rather watch Marat Safin's forehand than Justine Henin-Hardenne's backhand.
many player's have a safin-like forehand. justine's is the only one handed backhand that's different in the women's field. she can do anything with it. dont bring mauresmo for comparison cuz she can hit it flat to say her life.

Give me Andre Agassi vs. James Blake and take Mary Pierce vs. Amelie Mauresmo -- please.
bringing out the best USO match. at least Mary caused the upset. james choked.

And, yes, Rafael Nadal's Capri pants look better than Serena Williams' go-go boots.
purely an opinion, that's fine. i'd go with serena's boots any day. i'm sure linda would prefer nadal's too-tight gay looking top to Serena's denim skirt.

Men's tennis beats women's tennis, in terms of quality and personality.
quality? maybe. i dont watch enough tennis from both sides to make a comparison. personality? hewitt and coria are sour-pusses. Nadal is about the only one who has charisma. on the women's side u have Sharapova, the sisters, Karantantcheva, Mirza and a whole lot more who generate lots of buzz.



Men's tennis is entertaining again. The groundstrokes are awesome. The quickness of players such as Nadal, Guillermo Coria or Lleyton Hewitt takes your breath away. Federer has brought back the art of shot-making.
right, that's why Kim's defensive style and speed is so pathetic. the williams sisters' ability to run down every shot and turn defense into offense is overlooked. same with justine.

Listen to the mesmerizing thwack-thwack of a men's match and contrast it to the sounds of women's tennis -- bleating and choking.
OMG!coria was so mentally tough in the FO final. as was james blake at the USO.

The men's game is filled with upsets and thrillers and the emergence of a Robby Ginepri or a Gaston Gaudio because there is more depth. The early rounds for women feature dreadful 40-minute two-setters. Or even the late rounds. Henin-Hardenne disposed of Pierce in this year's French Open final without getting her shoes dirty. Last year's Roland Garros final between Anastasia Myskina and Dementieva was unworthy of a Grand Slam. You, dear reader, could have beaten either player. Heck, even David could have won.
uh-huh, so filled with upsets that it's always the 2 expected players that reach the final (barring the French Open). everybody expected mary pierce to make the finals of the French and US you see.

At least when Safin self-destructs it's fun to watch.
it's never fun to watch anyone self destruct. period. only a fool would say this.

Would you rather hear Agassi speak eloquently about the devastation wrought by Hurricane Katrina or Venus Williams speak vacantly about how she's unaware of current events?
and which male player spoke about the russian tragedy last year? Elena Dementieva did. in fact, it was one of the best speeches ever.

Federer is a cut above, but it's interesting to watch history being made; he's already drawing comparsions to Rod Laver. On the women's side, it's a parade of undeserving No. 1s such as Lindsay Davenport, Clijsters and Mauresmo.
you said it yourself. Federer is a cut above the rest. in the women's game u have serena who when healthy, is unbeatable.

The women are either physically hurt or mentally frail. The guys don't fuss about the crushing pressure of the pro tour. They accept it as part of sports.
right, no male player has ever wanted a shorter season.those who are hurt rarely make a successful comeback unlike the women's game where they work their butt off to make a comeback.

The best thing about women's tennis was the Williams sisters. But Venus and Serena have gone from refreshing to annoying. They are now as shallow and materialistic as most athletes. Venus came up with a lame excuse for losing earlier this week. She said she blew her quarterfinal to Clijsters because Clijsters started playing poorly, causing her to play poorly, too. Uh, earth to Venus: Usually when your opponent stinks, you capitalize rather than capitulate.
omg!stop the press, there hasn't been a male player who came up with a lame excuse for losing. as for the williams' sisters being the best thing, i disagree. there was anna k who despite not winning a title, created more of an impact in tennis than the mighty federer himself.

Maria Sharapova has great potential -- if she doesn't become another burned-out-by-the-domineering-dad cliché. But it's the other dream teen -- Nadal -- who puts on a better show.
puts on a better show how? both annoy the people with either grunts or fist pumps. both fight to the last point. both have great games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Experimentee

·
Registered
Joined
·
439 Posts
oh and as for the serve, big serves normally win tiebreakers in crunch time. a-rod doesn't. dementieve does, and she does it against awesome returners.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
10,023 Posts
i agree with her that men's tennis is generally more interesting, but she couldn't have picked a more :bs: of proving it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
28,276 Posts
name_change : Mirnyi does a pretty good split :p

Oh, and I think that Sharapova has about as much charisma as a wet sock. It's at least somewhat subjective :p The author of the article would do well to keep that in mind.
 
1 - 20 of 39 Posts
Top